Borders chief quits saying

Author
Discussion

Wings

5,814 posts

216 months

Wednesday 9th November 2011
quotequote all
[quote=Mojooo]

At a time when they are going through big cuts are they going to fire and hire new staff with all the associate costs?

Yes they are, and again i repeat that experience staff have been made redundant, staffing levels have been declining since 2002. I post a link from a Commons Select Committee report, with evidence being presented by customs staffs Public Services Union representative.

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200607/...

CUSTOMS COVER

26. PCS have consistently expressed concern about the inadequacy of resources to provide Customs cover at ports and airports in the UK. Our concerns support Lord Carlile's comments made to MPs in March 2003, repeated more recently, that Customs officers are spread too thinly, and that security at small ports, airports and coves should be tighter. He said: "We have to remember that lethal material could be brought into this country on a small yacht into a small harbour anywhere around the coastline." The Maritime, Aviation and Intelligence Team (MAIT) were the only such intelligence team in any law enforcement agency, and were looked on as the leaders in this field by other agencies who called on MAIT for intelligence and support. The MAIT have now been specifically directed away from uncanalised work. With no equivalent law unit there is effectively nobody proactively looking for intelligence in relation to anything other than the very major canalised ports and airports, and nobody identifying and cultivating sources in these areas.


27. There is now no permanent customs cover across hundreds of miles of UK coastline, notably in Devon and Cornwall, where permanent Customs cover was removed in 2003, and along the Welsh coastline, where there are no uniformed front line Customs officers from Cardiff to Holyhead or from Holyhead to Liverpool. There is clear evidence that this has led to an increase in smuggling of drugs and firearms as well as people, cigarettes and alcohol. The Department's Annual Report shows that only 21 tobacco gangs were disrupted in 2005-06 as compared to 87 in 2002-03, with lost revenue from tobacco fraud running at over £3 billion.






GingerWizard

4,721 posts

199 months

Wednesday 9th November 2011
quotequote all
The interium leader of ukba is as i understand a stats man.

Bodes well it does not.

Its a tough job made harder by labours ideology of open boarders.

Epic fail....

Guybrush

4,351 posts

207 months

Thursday 10th November 2011
quotequote all
Labour has already let 5 million in (not all of them illegals), just so we can have more crowded roads, shortage of jobs for our own, housing shortage. Nice one Labour, anything else you bu55ered up? Oh yes, the economy.

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

205 months

Thursday 10th November 2011
quotequote all
Victor McDade said:
Theresa May would not be the Home Secretary had she been a man. Irrespective of whether she is to blame for this specific fiasco, I hope she's replaced by someone more competent sooner rather than later. She is the Tory version of Jacqui Smith.
if she had been Labour this thread would be 20 pages long by now and calling for her to resign and a general election

crankedup

25,764 posts

244 months

Tuesday 15th November 2011
quotequote all
So here is a bloke having served forty years, commendations and even a CBE and we are expected to believe that he suddenly decided to ignore instructions from the Home Secretary. Beggars believe. Lets see how a politician wiggles away from this one. Or alternatively the Civil Servant suffered some type of brain lapse recently.

chris watton

22,477 posts

261 months

Tuesday 15th November 2011
quotequote all
crankedup said:
So here is a bloke having served forty years, commendations and even a CBE and we are expected to believe that he suddenly decided to ignore instructions from the Home Secretary. Beggars believe. Lets see how a politician wiggles away from this one. Or alternatively the Civil Servant suffered some type of brain lapse recently.
I certainly will be interesting to see how this pans out - it seems that May had a 'kneejerk' reaction to potential bad headlines and acted before she should have. Either way, it seems we have yet another useless HS.

ninja-lewis

4,242 posts

191 months

Tuesday 15th November 2011
quotequote all
crankedup said:
So here is a bloke having served forty years, commendations and even a CBE and we are expected to believe that he suddenly decided to ignore instructions from the Home Secretary. Beggars believe. Lets see how a politician wiggles away from this one. Or alternatively the Civil Servant suffered some type of brain lapse recently.
Wasn't he governor at HMP Whitemoor when the IRA smuggled a gun in and six prisoners used it to escape?

maix27

1,070 posts

197 months

Tuesday 15th November 2011
quotequote all
She's got one of those faces you just want to hit, doesn't she?

I just can't listen to her without thinking 'you're lying' or 'you haven't got a clue what you're talking about'.

crankedup

25,764 posts

244 months

Tuesday 15th November 2011
quotequote all
ninja-lewis said:
Wasn't he governor at HMP Whitemoor when the IRA smuggled a gun in and six prisoners used it to escape?
Yes I do believe your right, still fair play, we are all allowed one or two mistakes in a life time of work. wink Maybe they might allow the H.S. some slack on this one.

ralphrj

3,533 posts

192 months

Tuesday 15th November 2011
quotequote all
ninja-lewis said:
crankedup said:
So here is a bloke having served forty years, commendations and even a CBE and we are expected to believe that he suddenly decided to ignore instructions from the Home Secretary. Beggars believe. Lets see how a politician wiggles away from this one. Or alternatively the Civil Servant suffered some type of brain lapse recently.
Wasn't he governor at HMP Whitemoor when the IRA smuggled a gun in and six prisoners used it to escape?
Yes.

After that he was put in charge of Yarl's Wood Immigration Centre.

Which then burned down.

Riff Raff

5,123 posts

196 months

Tuesday 15th November 2011
quotequote all
maix27 said:
She's got one of those faces you just want to hit, doesn't she?

I just can't listen to her without thinking 'you're lying' or 'you haven't got a clue what you're talking about'.
Before her we had: Blunkett, Clarke, Reid, Johnson and Jacqui Smith.

To be honest she'd have to go some to be worse than anyone on that list. Except maybe Charles Clarke. I had a soft spot for him. The others were just prize cretins.

Derek Smith

45,679 posts

249 months

Tuesday 15th November 2011
quotequote all
Riff Raff said:
Before her we had: Blunkett, Clarke, Reid, Johnson and Jacqui Smith.

To be honest she'd have to go some to be worse than anyone on that list. Except maybe Charles Clarke. I had a soft spot for him. The others were just prize cretins.
Blunkett was the worst of that lot. The legislation he pushed through was poorly worded and in some cases against the law. I had to write a report on his Criminal Law Act and I was a bit confused. I went to see the resident judge of East Sussex and he told me not to bother as the act would be binned in six months. It took a little longer but not much.

0a

23,901 posts

195 months

Tuesday 15th November 2011
quotequote all
Mojooo said:
0a said:
This isn't correct. Getting rid of incomepetent staff, retraining and changing procedure is what it's all about. I was present at a talk by the most senior guy at a UK airport and they had massive, massive improvements after looking at this. No staff increase.
At a time when they are going through big cuts are they going to fire and hire new staff with all the associate costs?
Managing them properly, getting rid of shift patterns that didn't work, sacking the third that were incompetent the airport moved from one of the worst in the UK in tests to one of the best with reduced waiting time.

It annoys me that people think it's a numbers game. It isn't - sometimes getting rid of people will make the public safer and the service more efficient.

Mojooo

12,741 posts

181 months

Tuesday 15th November 2011
quotequote all
Derek Smith said:
Blunkett was the worst of that lot. The legislation he pushed through was poorly worded and in some cases against the law. I had to write a report on his Criminal Law Act and I was a bit confused. I went to see the resident judge of East Sussex and he told me not to bother as the act would be binned in six months. It took a little longer but not much.
Surely the poor wording is dow nto the lawyers that draft the law? Couldnt find an Act of that name so recently - can you be more specific?

ExChrispy Porker

16,927 posts

229 months

Tuesday 15th November 2011
quotequote all
Slightly O/T

I recently travelled by train from London to Malmo in Sweden.

No-one checked my passport at all after leaving London. via France, Belgium, Germany, Denmark, and Sweden.

Makes you wonder what all the fuss is about really.

Busa_Rush

6,930 posts

252 months

Tuesday 15th November 2011
quotequote all
maix27 said:
She's got one of those faces you just want to hit, doesn't she?

I just can't listen to her without thinking 'you're lying' or 'you haven't got a clue what you're talking about'.
I quite like her. Nice legs too smile

Disgusted

853 posts

191 months

Tuesday 15th November 2011
quotequote all
crankedup said:
ninja-lewis said:
Wasn't he governor at HMP Whitemoor when the IRA smuggled a gun in and six prisoners used it to escape?
Yes I do believe your right, still fair play, we are all allowed one or two mistakes in a life time of work. wink Maybe they might allow the H.S. some slack on this one.
Clark had only been in post for a short time prior to the escape; after an extensive witch hunt/investigation- he was pretty much cleared of responsibility.

The previous governor, who'd got himself a tidy berth lined up doing a (paid) criminology degree at (I think) Cambridge University, ended up on jankers instead and was sentenced to a long period of time in a small dark room at HQ as Deputy Head of Paperclips or somesuch.

The gun used during the escape had been secreted inside long before Clark's arrival. As had the semtex, discovered a little later. That was a fun few weeks. The reason that these items had got in was deeply infected with politics, mainly surrounding a recently declared IRA ceasefire and the arrangements for IRA prisoners' visitors.

Clark, in my experience, is/was one of the good guys. He was a very hard bloke: in his first few weeks at Whitemoor, he single-handedly floored and restrained a prisoner who had kicked off in a wing office.
It is far from normal for a No1 Governor to do something like this.

markcoznottz

7,155 posts

225 months

Tuesday 15th November 2011
quotequote all
Derek Smith said:
Riff Raff said:
Before her we had: Blunkett, Clarke, Reid, Johnson and Jacqui Smith.

To be honest she'd have to go some to be worse than anyone on that list. Except maybe Charles Clarke. I had a soft spot for him. The others were just prize cretins.
Blunkett was the worst of that lot. The legislation he pushed through was poorly worded and in some cases against the law. I had to write a report on his Criminal Law Act and I was a bit confused. I went to see the resident judge of East Sussex and he told me not to bother as the act would be binned in six months. It took a little longer but not much.
Blunkett thought he was more intelligent than he really was. In reality he was just another commie. Also has that annoying habit of speaking really slowly, to the extent you forget waht the f**k point he was even making.

paddyhasneeds

51,322 posts

211 months

Tuesday 15th November 2011
quotequote all
Well, having seen highlights of Clark, his boss, and what I've seen of May, I know who I find the most plausible so far, and it's Clark.