Scottish Referendum / Independence

Scottish Referendum / Independence

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

204 months

Monday 9th January 2012
quotequote all
Derek Smith said:
Lots don’t have midges - the midges! If only their energy could be harnessed. It would provide a greater return than the oil ever would..
If we could harness and control the midges we certaintly wouldn't need an army either

stichill99

1,043 posts

181 months

Monday 9th January 2012
quotequote all
Christ, I dread the day if we get independence. As a country we couldn't manage to build a new Parliament for £45 million and it ended up costing over £400 million. We have a population of 5'000'000 with 500'000 civil servants when Norway with a similar population can do with half that amount. Another great display of Scottish competence with the Edinburgh Trams fiasco,just wait until we start to build a new Forth bridge! We are all doomed I tell yee!

jshell

11,006 posts

205 months

Tuesday 10th January 2012
quotequote all
stichill99 said:
Christ, I dread the day if we get independence. As a country we couldn't manage to build a new Parliament for £45 million and it ended up costing over £400 million. We have a population of 5'000'000 with 500'000 civil servants when Norway with a similar population can do with half that amount. Another great display of Scottish competence with the Edinburgh Trams fiasco,just wait until we start to build a new Forth bridge! We are all doomed I tell yee!
The idealistic view of Norway just doesn't stack up whe you actually look at it. On paper it's great, in reality it's really not so great. It's well funded communism with an iron grip on the population, in many ways.

mattnunn

14,041 posts

161 months

Tuesday 10th January 2012
quotequote all
jshell said:
The idealistic view of Norway just doesn't stack up whe you actually look at it. On paper it's great, in reality it's really not so great. It's well funded communism with an iron grip on the population, in many ways.
I've spent a fair bit of time in norway and with norwegians, i think you're over egging th pudding somewhat. They certainly have a national charachter akin to other scandinavian and germanic neighbours with a focus on collective well being most likely moulded by the harsh environment in which they live. But Finland is similair and wealthy without the oil, so is sweden.

The scots are much more like the irish.

jshell

11,006 posts

205 months

Tuesday 10th January 2012
quotequote all
mattnunn said:
jshell said:
The idealistic view of Norway just doesn't stack up whe you actually look at it. On paper it's great, in reality it's really not so great. It's well funded communism with an iron grip on the population, in many ways.
I've spent a fair bit of time in norway and with norwegians, i think you're over egging th pudding somewhat. They certainly have a national charachter akin to other scandinavian and germanic neighbours with a focus on collective well being most likely moulded by the harsh environment in which they live. But Finland is similair and wealthy without the oil, so is sweden.

The scots are much more like the irish.
It's more the total control of the population that I was talking about in terms of what the social security number means and is used for. Government control and access to records is like a Jack Straw wet dream. Penalties for such things as speeding are stratospheric. They won't upgrade roads as it 'encourages people to drive faster'. Many over the counter UK medicines are banned. Taxation is unbelieveable. Regulations are reminiscent of Eastern block idealism. Unions have an absolute stranglehold on business.

Even the Norwgians call it the last Comunist state of Europe.

It's not as rosy as it tends to be painted by the SNP. There are vast differences between Norway and other scandinavian countries such as Sweden and Denmark.

AJS-

15,366 posts

236 months

Tuesday 10th January 2012
quotequote all
mattnunn said:
jshell said:
The idealistic view of Norway just doesn't stack up whe you actually look at it. On paper it's great, in reality it's really not so great. It's well funded communism with an iron grip on the population, in many ways.
I've spent a fair bit of time in norway and with norwegians, i think you're over egging th pudding somewhat. They certainly have a national charachter akin to other scandinavian and germanic neighbours with a focus on collective well being most likely moulded by the harsh environment in which they live. But Finland is similair and wealthy without the oil, so is sweden.

The scots are much more like the irish.
I was speaking to a Norwegian about a week ago who said pretty much the same as mattnunn. It's not violently totalitarian in the Soviet sense, but it sounds like an incredibly prescrptive and buttoned down society, where the government remains popular domestically and internationally so long as the oil keeps flowing and the money keeps coming.

AJS-

15,366 posts

236 months

Tuesday 10th January 2012
quotequote all
jshell said:
It's more the total control of the population that I was talking about in terms of what the social security number means and is used for. Government control and access to records is like a Jack Straw wet dream. Penalties for such things as speeding are stratospheric. They won't upgrade roads as it 'encourages people to drive faster'. Many over the counter UK medicines are banned. Taxation is unbelieveable. Regulations are reminiscent of Eastern block idealism. Unions have an absolute stranglehold on business.

Even the Norwgians call it the last Comunist state of Europe.

It's not as rosy as it tends to be painted by the SNP. There are vast differences between Norway and other scandinavian countries such as Sweden and Denmark.
Another point I always hear Norwegians complaining about is the price of everything.

They might look rich on paper but I remember when I lived in Newcastle Norwegians would come over and marvel at the goods on display in shops and the unbelievably low prices. At that time (about 10 years ago) many Norwegian households had only one TV, one car and would eat out only on special occasions. Alcohol consumption is pretty much weddings and Christmas only.

rev-erend

Original Poster:

21,415 posts

284 months

Tuesday 10th January 2012
quotequote all
AJS- said:
mattnunn said:
jshell said:
The idealistic view of Norway just doesn't stack up whe you actually look at it. On paper it's great, in reality it's really not so great. It's well funded communism with an iron grip on the population, in many ways.
I've spent a fair bit of time in norway and with norwegians, i think you're over egging th pudding somewhat. They certainly have a national charachter akin to other scandinavian and germanic neighbours with a focus on collective well being most likely moulded by the harsh environment in which they live. But Finland is similair and wealthy without the oil, so is sweden.

The scots are much more like the irish.
I was speaking to a Norwegian about a week ago who said pretty much the same as mattnunn. It's not violently totalitarian in the Soviet sense, but it sounds like an incredibly prescrptive and buttoned down society, where the government remains popular domestically and internationally so long as the oil keeps flowing and the money keeps coming.
Talking of Norway - did not Sweden actually have to 'buy' its independance from Norway a good fews years back (1905)

Norfolkit

2,394 posts

190 months

Tuesday 10th January 2012
quotequote all
cocopop said:
What about Scot's living in England and vice versa. If there was a 'yes' vote, what would be the implications?
They get shot as spies smile

jshell

11,006 posts

205 months

Tuesday 10th January 2012
quotequote all
AJS- said:
mattnunn said:
jshell said:
The idealistic view of Norway just doesn't stack up whe you actually look at it. On paper it's great, in reality it's really not so great. It's well funded communism with an iron grip on the population, in many ways.
I've spent a fair bit of time in norway and with norwegians, i think you're over egging th pudding somewhat. They certainly have a national charachter akin to other scandinavian and germanic neighbours with a focus on collective well being most likely moulded by the harsh environment in which they live. But Finland is similair and wealthy without the oil, so is sweden.

The scots are much more like the irish.
I was speaking to a Norwegian about a week ago who said pretty much the same as mattnunn. It's not violently totalitarian in the Soviet sense, but it sounds like an incredibly prescrptive and buttoned down society, where the government remains popular domestically and internationally so long as the oil keeps flowing and the money keeps coming.
I would use the 'frog in boiling water' analogy. Drop a frog in boiling water it'll get upset, drop the frog in warm water and heat it up and the frog won't notice. The people in Norway have seen new wealth and good social service so they don't complain about the level of state control or interference. They are starting to get into high personal debt though with taking finance on cars & goods and having mental-high mortgages. They find it almost impossible to lose a job though due to hugely strong unions. Some of the infrastructure is falling apart like schools and roads, so it's time they dipped into the oil-fund.

Don't get me wrong, it's a nice place to live, but not for a very long time. It is very hard to buy decent food though!!

Just on prices, a 2007 Audi A4 1.9tdi with 50k miles on the clock will cost around £25,000!!

muffinmenace

1,033 posts

188 months

Tuesday 10th January 2012
quotequote all
I still find it frustrating that there is so little information on the finances of how all this will work, there's plenty of rhetoric from Dear Leader that they can survive as a AAA country with magical GDP growth but I just can't see anything to back this up.

emicen

8,585 posts

218 months

Tuesday 10th January 2012
quotequote all
Could someone please link me that report/graphic I recall seeing on here that showed London and SE being the only regions that had a tax:take surplus and how, although closest out of the other UK regions, Scotland was still a net burden on UK Plc?

As for my opinion, as a proud Scot and Brit, if they get independance, I'll fill in my transfer forms in work and get the hell out of here. Although North sea oil revenues remain good, tourism could be improved and the new oil revenues of West Shetland will be good, there core problem is an independant Scotland would only work if all the work shy dossers suddenly upped and pulled their weight too. Cant see it happening.

slow_poke

1,855 posts

234 months

Tuesday 10th January 2012
quotequote all
Hey, if they want to be independent then let them them go and the best of luck to them.

What comes after is more interesting for the rump that's left over. What happens to Northern ireland? They're entered into a Union with Great Britain. Which way do they jump when Great Britain itself is sundered?

Janluke

2,585 posts

158 months

Tuesday 10th January 2012
quotequote all
slow_poke said:
Hey, if they want to be independent then let them them go and the best of luck to them.
There's a lot of us up here that are more than happy with the way things are

ExChrispy Porker

16,914 posts

228 months

Tuesday 10th January 2012
quotequote all
Will the English get a vote ?
It affects us as well, after all.

slow_poke

1,855 posts

234 months

Tuesday 10th January 2012
quotequote all
Janluke said:
slow_poke said:
Hey, if they want to be independent then let them them go and the best of luck to them.
There's a lot of us up here that are more than happy with the way things are
Sure thing, but if the majority want to break away then best let them go.

mattnunn

14,041 posts

161 months

Tuesday 10th January 2012
quotequote all
I do think it would be a good idea, if the scots get independance, for westminster to push the responsibility for Northern Ireland onto them aswell.

i'll be sad and upset if the Scots do vote for independance. Sad and upset.

Gun

13,431 posts

218 months

Tuesday 10th January 2012
quotequote all
ExChrispy Porker said:
Will the English get a vote ?
It affects us as well, after all.
We should do, we should all get a say on the future make-up of the country we all live in.

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

204 months

Tuesday 10th January 2012
quotequote all
Gun said:
ExChrispy Porker said:
Will the English get a vote ?
It affects us as well, after all.
We should do, we should all get a say on the future make-up of the country we all live in.
According to internet experts Scotland has a HUGE negative effect on the UK

Gene Vincent

4,002 posts

158 months

Tuesday 10th January 2012
quotequote all
More power... less subsidy... let the be-kilted whining s see if the majority of their fellow countrymen/women are as dumb as the nomenclaturi think they are.

It is a plus for the UK.

The be-kilted jessies will be paying out for prescriptions, education and christ knows what else at the real cost... bankrupt in 10 years max.

It's not even warm, so they can't rely on tourism.
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED