More Vaz

[ThunderGuts]

[number 46]

When is this odious fraudulent going to just fk off????

[jjlynn27]

Quite clearly BBC is still trying to hide stories about Vaz. I'm trying to remember who was the paranoid dimwit who was whining about it, but can't be arsed to look back.

[PurpleMoonlight]

Anyone hazard a guess of what crime is being investigated?

It appears he offered to reimburse the cost of drugs to a third party if that third party was to purchase them for their personal use. In the end they didn't.

[Burwood]

number 46 said:

When is this odious fraudulent going to just fk off????

When he finds a better gravy train

[FN2TypeR]

Burwood said:

number 46 said:

When is this odious fraudulent going to just fk off????

When he finds a better gravy train

We're leaving the EU, so there likely isn't one.

Damn, missed a trick with that leave vote.

[CoolHands]

PurpleMoonlight said:

Anyone hazard a guess of what crime is being investigated?

It appears he offered to reimburse the cost of drugs to a third party if that third party was to purchase them for their personal use. In the end they didn't.

I'm no legal beagle but it easily looks like he could have committed one of these:

Inchoate offences:

Incitement of any of the above offences - s.19 of the Act;
Participating in an offence (that corresponds with an offence under the Act) outside of the UK - s.20 of the Act;
Attempting to commit a drugs offence - Criminal Attempts Act 1981;
Conspiracy to commit a drugs offence - Criminal Law Act 1977;
Encouraging or assisting in the commission of an offence - Part 2 Serious Crimes Act 2007.

[Burwood]

PurpleMoonlight said:

Anyone hazard a guess of what crime is being investigated?

It appears he offered to reimburse the cost of drugs to a third party if that third party was to purchase them for their personal use. In the end they didn't.

he procured the drugs but claims not to have used them(the evidence may support that as he was heard saying as much). However procuring is 'Intent to Supply'. He also allowed drugs to be taken in his property which is also an offence. See Misuse of Drugs Act. 'Poppers' is that stuff the gay scene inhale. In my day it was called 'Rush'. I had to google poppers such is my sheltered life . It's amyl nitrate which isn't illegal. There was also talk of paying for Cocaine (not using), paying.

[Burwood]

CoolHands said:

PurpleMoonlight said:

Anyone hazard a guess of what crime is being investigated?

It appears he offered to reimburse the cost of drugs to a third party if that third party was to purchase them for their personal use. In the end they didn't.

I'm no legal beagle but it easily looks like he could have committed one of these:

Inchoate offences:

Incitement of any of the above offences - s.19 of the Act;
Participating in an offence (that corresponds with an offence under the Act) outside of the UK - s.20 of the Act;
Attempting to commit a drugs offence - Criminal Attempts Act 1981;
Conspiracy to commit a drugs offence - Criminal Law Act 1977;
Encouraging or assisting in the commission of an offence - Part 2 Serious Crimes Act 2007.

It may have escaped MPs but this sort of BS is exactly why the Trumps of this world get elected. Vaz should be in prison, let alone sitting on some prestigious committee and frankly I'm bewildered as to why he hasn't been booted out of Parliament. It beggars belief

[B'stard Child]

Burwood said:

CoolHands said:

PurpleMoonlight said:

Anyone hazard a guess of what crime is being investigated?

It appears he offered to reimburse the cost of drugs to a third party if that third party was to purchase them for their personal use. In the end they didn't.

I'm no legal beagle but it easily looks like he could have committed one of these:

Inchoate offences:

Incitement of any of the above offences - s.19 of the Act;
Participating in an offence (that corresponds with an offence under the Act) outside of the UK - s.20 of the Act;
Attempting to commit a drugs offence - Criminal Attempts Act 1981;
Conspiracy to commit a drugs offence - Criminal Law Act 1977;
Encouraging or assisting in the commission of an offence - Part 2 Serious Crimes Act 2007.

It may have escaped MPs but this sort of BS is exactly why the Trumps of this world get elected. Vaz should be in prison, let alone sitting on some prestigious committee and frankly I'm bewildered as to why he hasn't been booted out of Parliament. It beggars belief

My money is on he has several chips that he is holding onto as they may be useful one day

[Burwood]

B'stard Child said:

Burwood said:

CoolHands said:

PurpleMoonlight said:

Anyone hazard a guess of what crime is being investigated?

It appears he offered to reimburse the cost of drugs to a third party if that third party was to purchase them for their personal use. In the end they didn't.

I'm no legal beagle but it easily looks like he could have committed one of these:

Inchoate offences:

Incitement of any of the above offences - s.19 of the Act;
Participating in an offence (that corresponds with an offence under the Act) outside of the UK - s.20 of the Act;
Attempting to commit a drugs offence - Criminal Attempts Act 1981;
Conspiracy to commit a drugs offence - Criminal Law Act 1977;
Encouraging or assisting in the commission of an offence - Part 2 Serious Crimes Act 2007.

It may have escaped MPs but this sort of BS is exactly why the Trumps of this world get elected. Vaz should be in prison, let alone sitting on some prestigious committee and frankly I'm bewildered as to why he hasn't been booted out of Parliament. It beggars belief

My money is on he has several chips that he is holding onto as they may be useful one day

Ive heard that said before but someone who isn't being blackmailed, no, actually a few hundred in parliament surely would be asking WTF is going on.

[B'stard Child]

Burwood said:

B'stard Child said:

Burwood said:

CoolHands said:

PurpleMoonlight said:

Anyone hazard a guess of what crime is being investigated?

It appears he offered to reimburse the cost of drugs to a third party if that third party was to purchase them for their personal use. In the end they didn't.

I'm no legal beagle but it easily looks like he could have committed one of these:

Inchoate offences:

Incitement of any of the above offences - s.19 of the Act;
Participating in an offence (that corresponds with an offence under the Act) outside of the UK - s.20 of the Act;
Attempting to commit a drugs offence - Criminal Attempts Act 1981;
Conspiracy to commit a drugs offence - Criminal Law Act 1977;
Encouraging or assisting in the commission of an offence - Part 2 Serious Crimes Act 2007.

It may have escaped MPs but this sort of BS is exactly why the Trumps of this world get elected. Vaz should be in prison, let alone sitting on some prestigious committee and frankly I'm bewildered as to why he hasn't been booted out of Parliament. It beggars belief

My money is on he has several chips that he is holding onto as they may be useful one day

Ive heard that said before but someone who isn't being blackmailed, no, actually a few hundred in parliament surely would be asking WTF is going on.

I did say several............ "Drain the swamp"

[Cobnapint]

Sky have reported that the Met, after an assessment process conducted by their Special Enquiry Team, are now investigating offences under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971.

[Hainey]

Cobnapint said:

gruffalo said:

Justice select committee?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-37957991

'Mr Vaz. 59, told the Guardian he welcomed the Police's investigation'.

Yeah right Mr Vaz, 59.

Oh come on now, play fair. Word on the street is he is quite welcoming of intrusions.

[Einion Yrth]

Hainey said:

Oh come on now, play fair. Word on the street is he is quite welcoming of intrusions.

[PurpleMoonlight]

Burwood said:

PurpleMoonlight said:

Anyone hazard a guess of what crime is being investigated?

It appears he offered to reimburse the cost of drugs to a third party if that third party was to purchase them for their personal use. In the end they didn't.

he procured the drugs but claims not to have used them(the evidence may support that as he was heard saying as much). However procuring is 'Intent to Supply'. He also allowed drugs to be taken in his property which is also an offence. See Misuse of Drugs Act. 'Poppers' is that stuff the gay scene inhale. In my day it was called 'Rush'. I had to google poppers such is my sheltered life . It's amyl nitrate which isn't illegal. There was also talk of paying for Cocaine (not using), paying.

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1971/38/contents

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploa...



Has there been any procurement? It could perhaps be argued that offering to effectively pay for drugs that a third party purchased comes under the definition of supply, but it's stretching it in my opinion.

I cannot see any offence has been committed in relation to his property.

Are poppers unlawful?

[BlackLabel]

"Keith Vaz charged taxpayers £81 for a return ticket from London to Leicester that he couldn't have taken because he was in TUNISIA
The MP filed a return for £81.90 for the UK trip despite being in Tunisia
Mr Vaz is the former chairman of the powerful Home Affairs Committee
His team admitted an error was made and have told expenses watchdog


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3931028/Ke...
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook"


Wonder how many other "errors" he's made over the years.

[Thorodin]

To most reasonable minds his brazenness is even more offensive than the offences. And that sneering attitude and slightly bowed head quizzical glance through hooded eyelids...

[BlackLabel]

Vaz breaking parliamentary rules again - to help yet another multi millionaire mate of his.

Disgraced Keith Vaz lobbies bank boss over friend's £11million debt despite Commons guidelines.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/disgraced-kei...

[Mothersruin]

Anyone surprised?

His arrogance is mind blowing.