Bradley Wiggins in hospital after being knocked Off his bike

Bradley Wiggins in hospital after being knocked Off his bike

Author
Discussion

onyx39

Original Poster:

11,128 posts

151 months

Wednesday 7th November 2012
quotequote all
http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2012/nov/07/bradle...

Can you imagine the drivers reaction, I have hit a cyclist, but not just ANY cyclist!

Ray Luxury-Yacht

8,910 posts

217 months

Wednesday 7th November 2012
quotequote all
yikes: Crikey - that van driver's gonna get haters!


ad551

1,502 posts

214 months

Wednesday 7th November 2012
quotequote all
Why can't people just fking look properly?

superkartracer

8,959 posts

223 months

Wednesday 7th November 2012
quotequote all
Grim news indeed

Regards why people can't see -

http://www.londoncyclist.co.uk/raf-pilot-teach-cyc...

^^ our eyes are st thats why.

rohrl

8,746 posts

146 months

Wednesday 7th November 2012
quotequote all
Hope he's okay other than the broken ribs. Get well soon Brad.

McFsC

578 posts

153 months

Wednesday 7th November 2012
quotequote all
Super, that's just another reason to look more closely, not an excuse as to why drivers can't see... I'd rather people spend a few more seconds each day looking for me than potentially taking 60 years off my life.

Hoofy

76,423 posts

283 months

Wednesday 7th November 2012
quotequote all
superkartracer said:
Grim news indeed

Regards why people can't see -

http://www.londoncyclist.co.uk/raf-pilot-teach-cyc...

^^ our eyes are st thats why.
Interesting and worrying. I have noticed that saccading - and tried to get my eyes to scan smoothly. nuts

voyds9

8,489 posts

284 months

Wednesday 7th November 2012
quotequote all
Hoofy said:
Interesting and worrying. I have noticed that saccading - and tried to get my eyes to scan smoothly. nuts
Can't be done if you are asked to look left and right slow you get the saccadic movements, however if you follow an object eg a pen then the movements are smooth.

Good fun when you've had a few beers getting people to try.

Fleegle

16,690 posts

177 months

Wednesday 7th November 2012
quotequote all
Speed Kills



martin84

5,366 posts

154 months

Thursday 8th November 2012
quotequote all
If he was out in the dark it's not surprising really. The contrast between super bright headlights and dark road means everything else is largely invisible anyway.

I just hope he doesn't become the pin up boy for every anti-motoring rule the car hating green/CND/friends of the earth lobby want to peddle in the name of national importance.

dandarez

13,294 posts

284 months

Thursday 8th November 2012
quotequote all
It wasn't a van, it was a Vaux Astra, driven by a woman.

Bradley had shaved off his famous lucky sideburns.
'They were too recognisable — it was getting a bit much. Now I can put a hat on and no one knows who I am.'

But you'll get mowed down Brad...

Oops.

http://www.burtonmail.co.uk/Home/Wiggins-injured-i...

cptsideways

13,553 posts

253 months

Thursday 8th November 2012
quotequote all
superkartracer said:
Grim news indeed

Regards why people can't see -

http://www.londoncyclist.co.uk/raf-pilot-teach-cyc...

^^ our eyes are st thats why.
THIS is exactly why DRL's have become mandatory on all new cars, your brain can see bright light in your peripheral vision even if your not looking wink

Baryonyx

18,006 posts

160 months

Thursday 8th November 2012
quotequote all
He was probably trying to dodge the tax man when he strayed in front of the vehicle that knocked him over.

Digga

40,373 posts

284 months

Thursday 8th November 2012
quotequote all
ad551 said:
Why can't people just fking look properly?
Because plenty of them, like the who illegally entered a mini roundabout that my mate was cycling across last night, are on their frigging 'phones.

That and TBH, although I am all for cheap transport - cycling democtratises mobility and freedom - and the health benefits of being active, the unspoken truth is that the majority of the UK's roads are frankly inadequate for the motorised traffic, let alone adding cyclists 9and horse ridesr for that matter) into the mix. The carriageway widths in most areas originated years back and might have been fine when cars were rare and, even then, were the width of an MG TF or Austin A35 and trucks had about 180hp max, but these days they don't cope.

It's all part and parcel of an abject failure of all governments since the 1970's to move our road infrastructure forward. And before anyone mentions rail, I leave you weith the statistic that 90% of rail projects are over-optimistic in their forecasting of passenger numbers.

zcacogp

11,239 posts

245 months

Thursday 8th November 2012
quotequote all
Digga said:
Because plenty of them, like the who illegally entered a mini roundabout that my mate was cycling across last night, are on their frigging 'phones.

That and TBH, although I am all for cheap transport - cycling democtratises mobility and freedom - and the health benefits of being active, the unspoken truth is that the majority of the UK's roads are frankly inadequate for the motorised traffic, let alone adding cyclists 9and horse ridesr for that matter) into the mix. The carriageway widths in most areas originated years back and might have been fine when cars were rare and, even then, were the width of an MG TF or Austin A35 and trucks had about 180hp max, but these days they don't cope.

It's all part and parcel of an abject failure of all governments since the 1970's to move our road infrastructure forward. And before anyone mentions rail, I leave you weith the statistic that 90% of rail projects are over-optimistic in their forecasting of passenger numbers.
Bit of a rant Digga, but I agree wholeheartedly.


Oli.

Skii

1,632 posts

192 months

Thursday 8th November 2012
quotequote all
Glad he's ok, saw the news this morning and an eye-witness said 8 police cars attended .

Seriously? EIGHT ?!!!

2fast748

1,098 posts

196 months

Thursday 8th November 2012
quotequote all
My g/f drove past the scene not knowing what was going on and saw a police car heading that way. There was also an accident on the southbound exit slip of the M6 there that the police were attending to.

All she saw was a woman being restrained which as I've read might have been Wiggo's wife trying to batter whoever hit him!

It is a messy set of junctions though but there is a speed camera 200 yards up the road so it must be safe?!?

bebee

4,680 posts

226 months

Thursday 8th November 2012
quotequote all
ad551 said:
Why can't people just fking look properly?
That's true but having said that, I passed 3 cyclists without lights front or back, no refective clothes and on the road not pavement last night, what do these tts expect if they get hit by a car, I sure BW was well lit up though.

JonnyFive

29,401 posts

190 months

Thursday 8th November 2012
quotequote all
superkartracer said:
Grim news indeed

Regards why people can't see -

http://www.londoncyclist.co.uk/raf-pilot-teach-cyc...

^^ our eyes are st thats why.
Interesting, never knew any of that.

roadtripboy

245 posts

143 months

Thursday 8th November 2012
quotequote all
IMO a lot of drivers are programmed to look out for other motor vehicles and anything of a lesser width simply doesn't register. That said, cyclists who don't use lights don't exactly endear themselves.