North Korea - how serious should we take them?
Discussion
The Spruce goose said:
Driller said:
Are you seriously quoting the Daily Mirror as a reliable source as to what goes on in North Korea?
Again have you actually read it. The morons on here are getting worse everyday. The mirror did the interview, considering the story was picked up by leading newspapers around the world seems a valid witness statements to me unless you can evidence to counter the claims.And the onus is on you to prove your source, not for me to disprove it.
In the context, your use of the word "moron" is very ironic.
ETA "Teenage sex slaves" lol they're trying so hard aren't they?
Edited by Driller on Sunday 26th November 09:11
The Spruce goose said:
Driller said:
Are you seriously quoting the Daily Mirror as a reliable source as to what goes on in North Korea?
Again have you actually read it. The morons on here are getting worse everyday. The mirror did the interview, considering the story was picked up by leading newspapers around the world seems a valid witness statements to me unless you can evidence to counter the claims.Has Gordon Ramsey opened up a restaurant in NK?
Driller said:
Whatever the ridiculous comments are in the article, it’s clear that their agenda is the usual bulls
t hysterical sensationalism to wind the sheeple up rather than any semblance of recounting the facts.
quitet hysterical sensationalism to wind the sheeple up rather than any semblance of recounting the facts.These rumours came from this image:
from which an activist group in south korea extrapolated that anti aircraft guns at a firing range shooting at targets must be executing high level officials.
The first time this was reported was when General Hyon (NK) allegedly fell asleep during a meeting, and so this picture must have been him being executed.
This was despite the General featuring in some propaganda videos soon after, for which when NK has executed people, it expunges them from any videos/propaganda immediately.
This same anti-aircraft claim was then reused when a group of officials were dismissed, possibly executed, and seems to have been reused a few more times.
Mannginger said:
Looking to extend their influence per all Superpowers, given their success in Syria (I know it depends on viewpoint but they'll certainly see it as such) and given it's their relative backyard you can see why they'd want to
agreed.But also Russia's goal will be to screw over NK for resources, to weaken China's position, and to make US look even more impotent.
Russia and China both seem to have worked out the way through this is economically so I would expect more of the same
As soon as the USA see a performance from one of these missiles that would allow it to reach mainland USA, NK is going to be lit up.
This is no different to the Cuban missile crisis, the USA wont allow such a threat, irrespective of who is President.
It looks like China don't have any control over the idiot in charge in NK, so its only a matter of time now sadly.
This is no different to the Cuban missile crisis, the USA wont allow such a threat, irrespective of who is President.
It looks like China don't have any control over the idiot in charge in NK, so its only a matter of time now sadly.
jsf said:
As soon as the USA see a performance from one of these missiles that would allow it to reach mainland USA, NK is going to be lit up.
This is no different to the Cuban missile crisis, the USA wont allow such a threat, irrespective of who is President.
It looks like China don't have any control over the idiot in charge in NK, so its only a matter of time now sadly.
lol, so the red line is supposedly another country having the ability to get a missile to them?This is no different to the Cuban missile crisis, the USA wont allow such a threat, irrespective of who is President.
It looks like China don't have any control over the idiot in charge in NK, so its only a matter of time now sadly.
firstly this is rubbish, US have already claimed they are in range of NK: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-northkorea-miss...
secondly, why are only NK targets of this red line
thirdly, Trump's red button brings coke not nukes, does he even know how to launch them
However, shame to find out they still have the ability to do this and the mountain collapse didn't set them back years
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff