Drug mule

Author
Discussion

poo at Paul's

14,153 posts

176 months

Friday 4th August 2017
quotequote all
Nothingtoseehere said:
poo at Paul's said:
Post up your name and address so you don't hide behind any anonymity that you criticise others of. fking hypocryte
  • hypocrite.
Wear one of those Batman masks if you want,no one will recognise you.
Good tip, I see you're still hiding hey, White Knight?

Tell you what, when I get off drug smuggling and my agent posts me all over the daily wk rag, feel free to comment on my ankles.

Until then, why not take a look at hers, the left one is a worry. I thought she may have a DVT with all the flying to snazzy beaches on her jon seekers, to be honest? But hey, you keep knocking one out over them, (she probably really DOES love you!) .

dudleybloke

19,847 posts

187 months

Friday 4th August 2017
quotequote all
poo at Paul's said:
You're a bit dim, aren't you. I can comment on a public photo if I like, whether I be your "George Clooney" or a far 50 year old.

as for anonymity, post up your name and address so you don't hide behind any anonymity that you criticise others of. fking hypocrite

Keep at it, chap, if she gets a look at this thread, you may get an internet kiss sent over and you can have a wk on it.


Edited by poo at Paul's on Friday 4th August 19:43
Do you love her?


irocfan

40,536 posts

191 months

Friday 4th August 2017
quotequote all
Nothingtoseehere said:
They're not slagging off her looks.
If you're some sort of babe then you can criticise,if you're a fat 50 year old bloke then you really can't.
Post up and we'll judge.
by that logic you can't criticise any musician, artist, cook, driver, actor....

Dr Murdoch

3,446 posts

136 months

Friday 4th August 2017
quotequote all
irocfan said:
by that logic you can't criticise any musician, artist, cook, driver, actor....
Indeed. I can tell if a driver misses the apex, even If I would as well (tbh I would be nearer the gravel trap than apex....), but I still know.when someone makes a mistake

(or pimps them-self out to be a hottie when shes not)

Yipper

5,964 posts

91 months

Friday 4th August 2017
quotequote all
Looks like she has a lovely f*nny.

Nothingtoseehere

7,379 posts

155 months

Friday 4th August 2017
quotequote all
irocfan said:
by that logic you can't criticise any musician, artist, cook, driver, actor....
I wasn't entirely serious.

mjb1

2,556 posts

160 months

Saturday 5th August 2017
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
Thing is I can't work out who actually gives a single fk enough to buy a paper or do whatever it is that means there's justification to stick a pap on a beach or wherever she happens to be.
Nobody buys papers any more. But every single one of us clicked on that link to the Daily Mail article to study the photo's. We're all complicit! whistle

Disastrous

10,086 posts

218 months

Saturday 5th August 2017
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
Disastrous said:
Better than smuggling drugs though, right?
It does give the message that crime does pay unless there's a suggestion we'd have the slightest clue who she is if it wasn't for her doing time in Peru.
Whilst I agree on principle, I don't think a couple of grand from a scummy newspaper would be worth a stretch in a Peruvian jail for me...I don't think the level of profit here makes up for the jail time so I can't get too upset.

Additionally, once someone has done their time, I reckon that any legal income stream that keeps them out of jail is broadly a good thing. If you did time as a gangster and have been released, you should be allowed to write a book/make a film about your old life etc etc. Better than going back to the old life!

Gargamel

14,996 posts

262 months

Saturday 5th August 2017
quotequote all
Disastrous said:
Whilst I agree on principle, I don't think a couple of grand from a scummy newspaper would be worth a stretch in a Peruvian jail for me...I don't think the level of profit here makes up for the jail time so I can't get too upset.

Additionally, once someone has done their time, I reckon that any legal income stream that keeps them out of jail is broadly a good thing. If you did time as a gangster and have been released, you should be allowed to write a book/make a film about your old life etc etc. Better than going back to the old life!
This is a bit of a conandrum.

If in your old life you have hurt people or murdered people or live very well for a period of time on the proceeds of your crimes, then some films tend to glorify the crime and not show too much of the downsides.

Whilst I broadly agree, it obviously will be upsetting for victims and relatives.

No easy answer

bitchstewie

51,352 posts

211 months

Sunday 6th August 2017
quotequote all

Oakey

27,592 posts

217 months

Sunday 6th August 2017
quotequote all
Disastrous said:
Whilst I agree on principle, I don't think a couple of grand from a scummy newspaper would be worth a stretch in a Peruvian jail for me...I don't think the level of profit here makes up for the jail time so I can't get too upset.

Additionally, once someone has done their time, I reckon that any legal income stream that keeps them out of jail is broadly a good thing. If you did time as a gangster and have been released, you should be allowed to write a book/make a film about your old life etc etc. Better than going back to the old life!
She's supposedly been offered a £250,000 book deal.

anonymous-user

55 months

Sunday 6th August 2017
quotequote all
Djtemeka said:
Don't see what the big problem is. I bet most of you on here have had a drug in the past. Maybe taken some to a mates house. She just did it on a slightly larger scale biggrin
I think the problem is that she is attempting to become rich and famous on the back of simply being a criminal.

It's an extremely bad example to set for the selfie/instagram/Facebook generation who all desperately want their 15 minutes of fame and thousands of 'likes'.

Kids will be looking at her getting all the attention on instagram and in stty online newspapers, and see photos of her living the 'VIP lifestyle', and think that all they have to do to get the same is become a crap criminal.

These days, the very best punishment for tts like her is to give them a 15 year ban from all social media.

Disastrous

10,086 posts

218 months

Sunday 6th August 2017
quotequote all
Oakey said:
Disastrous said:
Whilst I agree on principle, I don't think a couple of grand from a scummy newspaper would be worth a stretch in a Peruvian jail for me...I don't think the level of profit here makes up for the jail time so I can't get too upset.

Additionally, once someone has done their time, I reckon that any legal income stream that keeps them out of jail is broadly a good thing. If you did time as a gangster and have been released, you should be allowed to write a book/make a film about your old life etc etc. Better than going back to the old life!
She's supposedly been offered a £250,000 book deal.
Would you do jail time in Peru for £250k? I honestly wouldn't.

Also, like I say, she's done the jail thing so I can't really grudge her selling the story. It's better than going back to trafficking drugs.

Ayahuasca

27,427 posts

280 months

Monday 7th August 2017
quotequote all
Disastrous said:
It's better than going back to trafficking drugs.
Are those her only life choices then?

S11Steve

6,374 posts

185 months

Monday 7th August 2017
quotequote all
Lord Marylebone said:
If you look at her Instagram it's all Ibiza, Marbella, partying, shopping, champagne, VIP events, clubs, bars, guest appearances, and so on.

Oh, and lots of photos of her in bikinis and revealing outfits.
A few people have commented with #tagthesponsor, but they are promptly deleted - I guess it has touched a nerve.
Google it, but it's potentially NSFW

Lord Marylebone said:
She is also obviously getting paid for quite a number of 'set-up' photo shoots where she pretends to be walking along a beach somewhere, a photographer from the Daily Mail/Sun takes a load of photos, and they give her some cash for it, then proceed to splash the 'paparazzi photos' all over their filthy newspapers.
All of the photos are always credited to the same PR agency - iceleb.Tv. Obviously they are not set up at all then...

There's also a strong rumour that she can be found "working" on sites for "adults".

Disastrous

10,086 posts

218 months

Monday 7th August 2017
quotequote all
Ayahuasca said:
Disastrous said:
It's better than going back to trafficking drugs.
Are those her only life choices then?
Of course not. But they are life choices.

fido

16,802 posts

256 months

Monday 7th August 2017
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
B/C-list footballer? I think the only 'qualification' required is a propensity to swallow jizz.

ChemicalChaos

10,399 posts

161 months

Wednesday 24th January 2018
quotequote all
fido said:
anonymous said:
[redacted]
B/C-list footballer? I think the only 'qualification' required is a propensity to swallow jizz.
And truth follows the predicted path....

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-5307161/...

Disastrous

10,086 posts

218 months

Wednesday 24th January 2018
quotequote all
ChemicalChaos said:
fido said:
anonymous said:
[redacted]
B/C-list footballer? I think the only 'qualification' required is a propensity to swallow jizz.
And truth follows the predicted path....

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-5307161/...
I see no mention of a footballer?? confused

Or should she not be allowed to get pregnant because she has been in prison?

Ructions

4,705 posts

122 months

Wednesday 24th January 2018
quotequote all
Disastrous said:
ChemicalChaos said:
fido said:
anonymous said:
[redacted]
B/C-list footballer? I think the only 'qualification' required is a propensity to swallow jizz.
And truth follows the predicted path....

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-5307161/...
I see no mention of a footballer?? confused

Or should she not be allowed to get pregnant because she has been in prison?
It definitely wasn't Chemical Chaos who did the deed.