EDL boss Tommy Robinson again proves his stupidity
Discussion
christian-ohtc3 said:
This might help you understand the point I was trying to make.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyWDqioptdo
I watched the first bit where he said the, "It is unclear if Tommy Robinson was present was present during the trouble at Oldham" sentence was a lie. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyWDqioptdo
He's not in a position to state if it's a lie. In order to do that, he'd need to know what information the BBC are acting upon or what degree of research they did and the motives of the author. Without knowing that information the best he can say is that he feels it is clear / the BBC are wrong etc.
You should provide your own argument rather than linking to someone who lacks basic critical thinking skills. Or at the very least to one where the creator can speak at a greater pace than 5 words per minute.
La Liga said:
christian-ohtc3 said:
This might help you understand the point I was trying to make.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyWDqioptdo
I watched the first bit where he said the, "It is unclear if Tommy Robinson was present was present during the trouble at Oldham", was a lie. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyWDqioptdo
He's not in a position to state if it's a lie. In order to do that, he'd need to know what information the BBC are acting upon or what degree of research they did. Without knowing that information the best he can say is that he feels it is clear / the BBC are wrong etc.
You should provide your own argument rather than linking to someone who makes such a basic critical errors. Or at least to one where the creator can speak at a greater pace than 5 words per minute.
If the people in this thread who are against TR turned up to protest, I'd imagine they would look something like this lot ...
https://youtu.be/997-cRFirrA
https://youtu.be/997-cRFirrA
christian-ohtc3 said:
La Liga said:
christian-ohtc3 said:
This might help you understand the point I was trying to make.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyWDqioptdo
I watched the first bit where he said the, "It is unclear if Tommy Robinson was present was present during the trouble at Oldham", was a lie. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyWDqioptdo
He's not in a position to state if it's a lie. In order to do that, he'd need to know what information the BBC are acting upon or what degree of research they did. Without knowing that information the best he can say is that he feels it is clear / the BBC are wrong etc.
You should provide your own argument rather than linking to someone who makes such a basic critical errors. Or at least to one where the creator can speak at a greater pace than 5 words per minute.
Noodle1982 said:
If the people in this thread who are against TR turned up to protest, I'd imagine they would look something like this lot ...
https://youtu.be/997-cRFirrA
Can we choose which one we’d like to be ?https://youtu.be/997-cRFirrA
La Liga said:
christian-ohtc3 said:
La Liga said:
christian-ohtc3 said:
This might help you understand the point I was trying to make.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyWDqioptdo
I watched the first bit where he said the, "It is unclear if Tommy Robinson was present was present during the trouble at Oldham", was a lie. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyWDqioptdo
He's not in a position to state if it's a lie. In order to do that, he'd need to know what information the BBC are acting upon or what degree of research they did. Without knowing that information the best he can say is that he feels it is clear / the BBC are wrong etc.
You should provide your own argument rather than linking to someone who makes such a basic critical errors. Or at least to one where the creator can speak at a greater pace than 5 words per minute.
I was wrong you don't seem to have the attention span to watch anything longer than 5 minutes, all the answers you seek complete with pictures are in the video, you can even do some crayoning when you finish watching if it makes you feel better.
Edited by christian-ohtc3 on Sunday 19th May 19:58
christian-ohtc3 said:
I selected the video with the slow narrator especially for you, I thought it would help you understand the point.
I was wrong you don't seem to have the attention span to watch anything longer than 5 minutes, all the answers you seek complete with pictures are in the video, you can even do some crayoning when you finish watching if it makes you feel better.
Somewhat undermined by having to have someone else make your argument for you. I was wrong you don't seem to have the attention span to watch anything longer than 5 minutes, all the answers you seek complete with pictures are in the video, you can even do some crayoning when you finish watching if it makes you feel better.
An especially low standard considering you selected someone who make a critical error with their first point.
Lindun said:
It’s easy. All videos linked are to Rebel Media, who are a non-partisan observer of UK politics. Honest, they are 
Plus the Oldham bloke. At least if it's BBC or Daily mail or whatever you can choose want you click.
I now keep getting targeted ads for Jack boots and a product that's guaranteed to remove diary product stains without leaving a smell. It's infuriating.
1602Mark said:
It'll be interesting to see just how many votes he gets in his quest to become an MEP and part of the thing he despises. Of course he'll then blame the Police, or Muslims, or the establishment for his loss. Assuming he doesn't claim the whole process isn't rigged obviously.
We got a leaflet through the letter box. Obviously I will be voting, but for his sort of hatred? Never. GPSHead said:
This video makes it more than clear what happened yesterday, and who the perpetrators unsurprisingly were. Here is the virtue-signallers' chance to demonstrate that they care more about fact than emotion, and that they are not in fact selling out their nation just to look trendy, by watching the whole video and then being honest with themselves, and everyone else, about what is really going on here.
"How DARE you call our ideology hostile?! Just for saying that on a political campaign, we're going to attack women, children and police with bricks en masse!" Why is it that we thick, toothless knuckle-draggers, none of whom have any qualifications whatsoever, are the only ones who can see the basic contradiction there?
That is extremely damning actually. Either it's very well put together by Tommy Robinson's campaign or the police were pretty stupid on this occasion. I would like to hear any alternative version of events."How DARE you call our ideology hostile?! Just for saying that on a political campaign, we're going to attack women, children and police with bricks en masse!" Why is it that we thick, toothless knuckle-draggers, none of whom have any qualifications whatsoever, are the only ones who can see the basic contradiction there?
JuanCarlosFandango said:
GPSHead said:
This video makes it more than clear what happened yesterday, and who the perpetrators unsurprisingly were. Here is the virtue-signallers' chance to demonstrate that they care more about fact than emotion, and that they are not in fact selling out their nation just to look trendy, by watching the whole video and then being honest with themselves, and everyone else, about what is really going on here.
"How DARE you call our ideology hostile?! Just for saying that on a political campaign, we're going to attack women, children and police with bricks en masse!" Why is it that we thick, toothless knuckle-draggers, none of whom have any qualifications whatsoever, are the only ones who can see the basic contradiction there?
That is extremely damning actually. Either it's very well put together by Tommy Robinson's campaign or the police were pretty stupid on this occasion. I would like to hear any alternative version of events."How DARE you call our ideology hostile?! Just for saying that on a political campaign, we're going to attack women, children and police with bricks en masse!" Why is it that we thick, toothless knuckle-draggers, none of whom have any qualifications whatsoever, are the only ones who can see the basic contradiction there?
rscott said:
Given who the video is posted by (Avi Yemeni) , it's pretty clear it's produced to portray Robinson in the best possible light.
Yes, which is why I said I would like to see or hear the alternative point of view on it, and why the police thought it ok to escort an angry mob of masked "counter protesters" to this event?JuanCarlosFandango said:
rscott said:
Given who the video is posted by (Avi Yemeni) , it's pretty clear it's produced to portray Robinson in the best possible light.
Yes, which is why I said I would like to see or hear the alternative point of view on it, and why the police thought it ok to escort an angry mob of masked "counter protesters" to this event?As for masked protesters, take a minute to look at those surrounding TR and you'll see there are plenty of masked idiots there also.
1602Mark said:
They escorted them to the event?
As for masked protesters, take a minute to look at those surrounding TR and you'll see there are plenty of masked idiots there also.
So are you presuming that Robinson's supporters started the violence and the counter protesters were defending themselves? As for masked protesters, take a minute to look at those surrounding TR and you'll see there are plenty of masked idiots there also.
GPSHead said:
This video makes it more than clear what happened yesterday, and who the perpetrators unsurprisingly were. Here is the virtue-signallers' chance to demonstrate that they care more about fact than emotion, and that they are not in fact selling out their nation just to look trendy, by watching the whole video and then being honest with themselves, and everyone else, about what is really going on here.
"How DARE you call our ideology hostile?! Just for saying that on a political campaign, we're going to attack women, children and police with bricks en masse!" Why is it that we thick, toothless knuckle-draggers, none of whom have any qualifications whatsoever, are the only ones who can see the basic contradiction there?
When d"How DARE you call our ideology hostile?! Just for saying that on a political campaign, we're going to attack women, children and police with bricks en masse!" Why is it that we thick, toothless knuckle-draggers, none of whom have any qualifications whatsoever, are the only ones who can see the basic contradiction there?
heads clash. JuanCarlosFandango said:
Yes, which is why I said I would like to see or hear the alternative point of view on it, and why the police thought it ok to escort an angry mob of masked "counter protesters" to this event?
What is the difference in the Freedom of Speech rights of each group? The only reason I ask is that I thought that was the basis for pretty much everything Tommy does. Or is it supposed to be different rules for each?I’ve seen many demonstrations / protests etc in my time and more often than not there are demonstrators / protestors from each side present at the event. You only have to look at the Houses of Parliament to see that it’s been full of Brexit / Remain campaigners for ages.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff