Malaysia Airlines Plane "Loses Contact"

[marshalla]

MartG said:

If you were to go for some system that automatically jettisoned a black box under certain circumstances, surely one of the parameters you would make sure it recorded would be the aircraft's position at the time of impact ? No matter how far the box then drifted it would provide information allowing the wreckage to be found.

Other way round. Airframe big = easier to find, then you're looking for a black box in a small search area. Jettisoned black box = small = difficult to find.

[MartG]

marshalla said:

MartG said:

If you were to go for some system that automatically jettisoned a black box under certain circumstances, surely one of the parameters you would make sure it recorded would be the aircraft's position at the time of impact ? No matter how far the box then drifted it would provide information allowing the wreckage to be found.

Other way round. Airframe big = easier to find, then you're looking for a black box in a small search area. Jettisoned black box = small = difficult to find.

Nope - aircraft wreckage at bottom of the sea v. floating box with radio beacon & strobe light - I think I know which would be easier to find

[marshalla]

MartG said:

Nope - aircraft wreckage at bottom of the sea v. floating box with radio beacon & strobe light - I think I know which would be easier to find

After the batteries die ?

[jmorgan]

Well, if you want then a box that emits a beep, low power usage, searchers looking for beep, beep back within a certain range and the strobe goes off.

[Engineer1]

marshalla said:

MartG said:

Nope - aircraft wreckage at bottom of the sea v. floating box with radio beacon & strobe light - I think I know which would be easier to find

After the batteries die ?

To be fair either will be damned difficult to find if the aircraft wasn't on its planned route, floating becons would be OK if they where picked up very quickly otherwise they could end up accidentally sunk or drifted miles. On the bottom they should stay fairly well put just hard to get too.

[Campo]

10 weeks in and some knob jockey has released a book on MH370 to cash in. wker

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2631527/Ex...

Meanwhile the families lawyer up and Malaysian Airlines subsequently stops supplying them with any aid.

Spares for the Bluefin underwater vehicle should arrive in Australia tomorrow (reported by the Mirror), hopefully this will enable Ocean Shield to get back out searching.

http://www.bluefinrobotics.com/products/bluefin-21...

Its still really early days, hopefully persistence will pay off.

[hedgefinder]

Engineer1 said:

To be fair either will be damned difficult to find if the aircraft wasn't on its planned route, floating becons would be OK if they where picked up very quickly otherwise they could end up accidentally sunk or drifted miles. On the bottom they should stay fairly well put just hard to get too.

but they could hold the information pertaining to the GPS position of their release surely.

[kev1974]

Campo said:

10 weeks in and some knob jockey has released a book on MH370 to cash in. wker

[url]http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2631527/Extraordinary-new-claim-book-missing-MH370-flight-accidentally-SHOT-search-effort-covered-up.html[/url

Someone else is already trying to tout a film around Cannes
http://metro.co.uk/2014/05/18/movie-about-the-miss...

So far they've knocked together a trailer, that's all.

[slartibartfast]

kev1974 said:

Campo said:

10 weeks in and some knob jockey has released a book on MH370 to cash in. wker

[url]http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2631527/Extraordinary-new-claim-book-missing-MH370-flight-accidentally-SHOT-search-effort-covered-up.html[/url

Someone else is already trying to tout a film around Cannes
http://metro.co.uk/2014/05/18/movie-about-the-miss...

So far they've knocked together a trailer, that's all.

using lots of footage of a 747...derrrr

[Ozzie Osmond]

marshalla said:

Airframe big = easier to find.

Also - engines large and heavy so sink very quickly and should give a decent target for search.

Personally I think those saying "it will never be found" are talking bunk. But I've been wrong before....

[Vipers]

Ozzie Osmond said:

marshalla said:

Airframe big = easier to find.

Also - engines large and heavy so sink very quickly and should give a decent target for search.

Personally I think those saying "it will never be found" are talking bunk. But I've been wrong before....

My prediction. It will be found, or it won't. Sorted.

[Vaud]

It won't be found in a timeframe that will inform us of anything useful, other than it crashed.

My £0.02.

[thehawk]

Steffan said:

Unexplained loss of all cabin pressure and anoxia seem to be the most probable causes to me.

Really? Even after all this time and "evidence" you really think that?

[Vipers]

Then again could have crashed in dense unpopulated jungle and may not be discovered for eons of time.

I don't think they know for certainly where it is supposed to have crashed, two sites mentioned, off Oz and one East of Malaya arnt exactly close are thet?.

[Big Rod]

kev1974 said:

Campo said:

10 weeks in and some knob jockey has released a book on MH370 to cash in. wker

[url]http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2631527/Extraordinary-new-claim-book-missing-MH370-flight-accidentally-SHOT-search-effort-covered-up.html[/url

Someone else is already trying to tout a film around Cannes
http://metro.co.uk/2014/05/18/movie-about-the-miss...

So far they've knocked together a trailer, that's all.

I can't see the actual film being much longer tbh.

[Four Litre]

el stovey said:

Steffan said:

Unexplained loss of all cabin pressure and anoxia seem to be the most probable causes to me.

Doesn't explain the switching off both the transponder and CPDLC though.

Wasnt it stated that it had been concluded using the data available that they had expertly flown around the radar borders to avoid detection and then been lost.... to me that blew the hypoxia theories out of the water.

[Steffan]

Four Litre said:

el stovey said:

Steffan said:

Unexplained loss of all cabin pressure and anoxia seem to be the most probable causes to me.

Doesn't explain the switching off both the transponder and CPDLC though.

Wasnt it stated that it had been concluded using the data available that they had expertly flown around the radar borders to avoid detection and then been lost.... to me that blew the hypoxia theories out of the water.

There are so much rumour and innuendo rolling about on this in reality, Who Knows? must surely be the current answer. I personally still favour the anoxia theory primarily because so far as I know that seems the most probable and least inventive. It does not explain everything but requires the least invention. Given the deliberate disinformation by the authorities there has been there can be very few certainties. Still seems the most likely to me but no really comprehensive explanation has been suggested as yet supported by any evidence because there is none nor will there be for some time. But that is my bet.

[eldar]

slartibartfast said:

using lots of footage of a 747...derrrr

747? It says filmed on an Aerobus!

[B17NNS]

"Staggering new claims that doomed plane was blown out of the sky by US and Thai fighter jets in training drill gone wrong."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2631527/Ex...

[jmorgan]

B17NNS said:

"Staggering new claims that doomed plane was blown out of the sky by US and Thai fighter jets in training drill gone wrong."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2631527/Ex...

Based on actual research or stuck a pin in a conspiracy web site. Mind you, this thread has a lot in it.