Malaysia Airlines Plane "Loses Contact"

Malaysia Airlines Plane "Loses Contact"

Author
Discussion

bitchstewie

51,588 posts

211 months

Monday 17th June 2019
quotequote all
Popped up today and is a decent (and sensible!) read

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/...

saaby93

32,038 posts

179 months

Monday 17th June 2019
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
Popped up today and is a decent (and sensible!) read

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/...
Interesting
How common is it for pilots to sleep with flight attendants?
or flight attendants to sleep with pilots?

Gameface

16,565 posts

78 months

Monday 17th June 2019
quotequote all
I've seen certain "special interest" films where it seems to happen regularly.


anonymous-user

55 months

Monday 17th June 2019
quotequote all
saaby93 said:
Interesting
How common is it for pilots to sleep with flight attendants?
or flight attendants to sleep with pilots?
Very.

Most of the pilots I know are either going out with flight attendants, married to flight attendants or having affairs with flight attendants or trying to do a combination of the above.

MartG

20,706 posts

205 months

Monday 17th June 2019
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
Popped up today and is a decent (and sensible!) read

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/...
Very good article

anonymous-user

55 months

Monday 17th June 2019
quotequote all
MartG said:
bhstewie said:
Popped up today and is a decent (and sensible!) read

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/...
Very good article
A very interesting read.

djc206

12,396 posts

126 months

Monday 17th June 2019
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
Popped up today and is a decent (and sensible!) read

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/...
I find it bizarre that they only use secondary radar. And even more bizarre that the Malaysian military did nothing.

eldar

21,852 posts

197 months

Monday 17th June 2019
quotequote all
MartG said:
Very good article
Except it didn't mention the aliens...

dvs_dave

8,686 posts

226 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
Good article. I didn’t realise that numerous pieces of (highly fragmented) wreckage had been found washed up, and that satellite data was sufficient to show a steep high speed descent in its final moments.

Everything points to it essentially being a mass murder suicide. Albeit with a bizarrely elaborate execution, and lacking a clear motive.

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
dvs_dave said:
and lacking a clear motive.
Some think the MA government know the motive and have covered it up to save face.

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
dvs_dave said:
Good article. I didn’t realise that numerous pieces of (highly fragmented) wreckage had been found washed up, and that satellite data was sufficient to show a steep high speed descent in its final moments.

Everything points to it essentially being a mass murder suicide. Albeit with a bizarrely elaborate execution, and lacking a clear motive.
It’s a good article but it still makes quite a few leaps in its’ conclusions and there’s still a lot of guesswork going on.





dvs_dave

8,686 posts

226 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
El stovey said:
dvs_dave said:
Good article. I didn’t realise that numerous pieces of (highly fragmented) wreckage had been found washed up, and that satellite data was sufficient to show a steep high speed descent in its final moments.

Everything points to it essentially being a mass murder suicide. Albeit with a bizarrely elaborate execution, and lacking a clear motive.
It’s a good article but it still makes quite a few leaps in its’ conclusions and there’s still a lot of guesswork going on.
Without the main wreckage located or the black boxes, of course there is guesswork. Trouble is these days we’re used to knowing the exact causes of an air crash in the minutest of details. That consequently makes us overly skeptical about the causes when those details aren’t available; despite the very low probability of those causes being substantially different from what Occam’s Razor predicts.

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
dvs_dave said:
El stovey said:
dvs_dave said:
Good article. I didn’t realise that numerous pieces of (highly fragmented) wreckage had been found washed up, and that satellite data was sufficient to show a steep high speed descent in its final moments.

Everything points to it essentially being a mass murder suicide. Albeit with a bizarrely elaborate execution, and lacking a clear motive.
It’s a good article but it still makes quite a few leaps in its’ conclusions and there’s still a lot of guesswork going on.
Without the main wreckage located or the black boxes, of course there is guesswork. Trouble is these days we’re used to knowing the exact causes of an air crash in the minutest of details. That consequently makes us overly skeptical about the causes when those details aren’t available; despite the very low probability of those causes being substantially different from what Occam’s Razor predicts.
The Atlantic article though makes lots of guesses about motive and inaccurate comments about airline procedures and the B777 and depression etc

It’s a good summary of the known facts but it lets itself down when it moves onto trying to create motive and explain the elaborate nature of the apparent murder suicide.

I can see lots of inaccuracies regarding pilots, airlines particularly MAS and operating the B777, it then makes me think these extend into the other comments about the Malaysians, their air defence and the amounts of wreckage found.

The author also unequivocally discounted the possibility of a technical issue. I was at a meeting a few years ago with B777 operators and pilots and B777 engineers and numerous scenarios were suggested that could have led to this happening.

Obviously murder suicide looks most likely (and seems most likely to me) but the article is making it look most likely by using inaccuracies as evidence.

dvs_dave

8,686 posts

226 months

Thursday 20th June 2019
quotequote all
El stovey said:
The author also unequivocally discounted the possibility of a technical issue. I was at a meeting a few years ago with B777 operators and pilots and B777 engineers and numerous scenarios were suggested that could have led to this happening.
Can you elaborate on this? What possible technical issues could result in an aircraft unintentionally and unrecoverably following the sequence of events that we know MH370 did?

peterperkins

3,155 posts

243 months

Thursday 20th June 2019
quotequote all
The captain did practise flying off into the middle of the ocean and running out of fuel scenario on his home flight sim setup.
That clinches (Murder suicide) for me really as it seems to match well with the known facts.

"Forensic examinations of Zaharie’s simulator by the FBI revealed that he experimented with a flight profile roughly matching that of MH370—a flight north around Indonesia followed by a long run to the south, ending in fuel exhaustion over the Indian Ocean. Malaysian investigators dismissed this flight profile as merely one of several hundred that the simulator had recorded. That is true, as far as it goes, which is not far enough. Victor Iannello, an engineer and entrepreneur in Roanoke, Virginia, who has become another prominent member of the Independent Group and has done extensive analysis of the simulated flight, underscores what the Malaysian investigators ignored.

Of all the profiles extracted from the simulator, the one that matched MH370’s path was the only one that Zaharie did not run as a continuous flight—in other words, taking off on the simulator and letting the flight play out, hour after hour, until it reached the destination airport. Instead he advanced the flight manually in multiple stages, repeatedly jumping the flight forward and subtracting the fuel as necessary until it was gone. Iannello believes that Zaharie was responsible for the diversion. Given that there was nothing technical that Zaharie could have learned by rehearsing the act on a gamelike Microsoft consumer product, Iannello suspects that the purpose of the simulator flight may have been to leave a bread-crumb trail to say goodbye. Referring to the flight profile that MH370 would follow, Iannello said of Zaharie, “It’s as if he was simulating a simulation.” Without a note of explanation, Zaharie’s reasoning is impossible to know. But the simulator flight cannot easily be dismissed as a random coincidence."

http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2016/07/mh370-pilot...

Byker28i

60,518 posts

218 months

Thursday 20th June 2019
quotequote all
eldar said:
MartG said:
Very good article
Except it didn't mention the aliens...
It didn't mention Arseout, how can they write an article without input from our expert?

Penelope Stopit

11,209 posts

110 months

Thursday 20th June 2019
quotequote all
El stovey said:
dvs_dave said:
El stovey said:
dvs_dave said:
Good article. I didn’t realise that numerous pieces of (highly fragmented) wreckage had been found washed up, and that satellite data was sufficient to show a steep high speed descent in its final moments.

Everything points to it essentially being a mass murder suicide. Albeit with a bizarrely elaborate execution, and lacking a clear motive.
It’s a good article but it still makes quite a few leaps in its’ conclusions and there’s still a lot of guesswork going on.
Without the main wreckage located or the black boxes, of course there is guesswork. Trouble is these days we’re used to knowing the exact causes of an air crash in the minutest of details. That consequently makes us overly skeptical about the causes when those details aren’t available; despite the very low probability of those causes being substantially different from what Occam’s Razor predicts.
The Atlantic article though makes lots of guesses about motive and inaccurate comments about airline procedures and the B777 and depression etc

It’s a good summary of the known facts but it lets itself down when it moves onto trying to create motive and explain the elaborate nature of the apparent murder suicide.

I can see lots of inaccuracies regarding pilots, airlines particularly MAS and operating the B777, it then makes me think these extend into the other comments about the Malaysians, their air defence and the amounts of wreckage found.

The author also unequivocally discounted the possibility of a technical issue. I was at a meeting a few years ago with B777 operators and pilots and B777 engineers and numerous scenarios were suggested that could have led to this happening.

Obviously murder suicide looks most likely (and seems most likely to me) but the article is making it look most likely by using inaccuracies as evidence.
Thanks for this, I won't be reading it

eldar

21,852 posts

197 months

Saturday 20th February 2021
quotequote all
Has there been any update in the past year or so, credible update, that is.

Ive seen the odd reference to some odd theories, but nothing particularly believeable.

Have i missed some news?

nigelpugh7

6,046 posts

191 months

Saturday 20th February 2021
quotequote all
eldar said:
Has there been any update in the past year or so, credible update, that is.

Ive seen the odd reference to some odd theories, but nothing particularly believeable.

Have i missed some news?
It’s amazing it’s been over 6 years ago, and not a scrap of recent debris found.

I still think there is a massive cover up on this from the Malaysian government.

I think I also read that Malaysia Air were not going to survive the downturn due to Covid, and the government won’t bail them out either!

Tragic and sad altogether.

TTmonkey

20,911 posts

248 months

Saturday 20th February 2021
quotequote all
Even if no aircraft found, you’d think that there would be personal affects washed up, I’d, wallets, handbags etc.
Nothing.