Boris and Dave's £160k game of tennis.
Discussion
The wife of Russian oligarch and former minister in Putin's govt paid 160 grand for a game of tennis with Boris and Cameron.
www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/160000-for-...
This sucks.
www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/160000-for-...
This sucks.
MarshPhantom said:
The wife of Russian oligarch and former minister in Putin's govt paid 160 grand for a game of tennis with Boris and Cameron.
www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/160000-for-...
This sucks.
Yepwww.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/160000-for-...
This sucks.
Far better to be reliant for funding on public sector unions which you then lavishly reward once in office.
JagLover said:
MarshPhantom said:
The wife of Russian oligarch and former minister in Putin's govt paid 160 grand for a game of tennis with Boris and Cameron.
www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/160000-for-...
This sucks.
Yepwww.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/160000-for-...
This sucks.
Far better to be reliant for funding on public sector unions which you then lavishly reward once in office.
JagLover said:
MarshPhantom said:
The wife of Russian oligarch and former minister in Putin's govt paid 160 grand for a game of tennis with Boris and Cameron.
www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/160000-for-...
This sucks.
Yepwww.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/160000-for-...
This sucks.
Far better to be reliant for funding on public sector unions which you then lavishly reward once in office.
Grubby little money spinner story won't go away - calls to return the money.
Will they? I doubt it.
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2701234/Tories-pr...
Will they? I doubt it.
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2701234/Tories-pr...
JagLover said:
Yep
Far better to be reliant for funding on public sector unions which you then lavishly reward once in office.
Do you not know the origins of the LABOUR party? Far better to be reliant for funding on public sector unions which you then lavishly reward once in office.
And if you want to see who is also influencing policy.....
http://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/2014/07/01/in...
Edited by Ionkontrol on Wednesday 23 July 12:06
The one thing I would mention is that at least 99.999% of the people who funs the Conservatives know that they are doing so and are happy to do so.
Not something that the Labour party (who are well known for their squeaky clean fund raising aren't they!) can say about the source of their funds...
Not something that the Labour party (who are well known for their squeaky clean fund raising aren't they!) can say about the source of their funds...
And so it turns into a Con v Lab thread again.
All parties should be open about funding.
This, however is not dignified. Smacks of J-Lo's appearance in Turkmenistan (I'm sure someone else did the same a year earlier and blamed her poor research)
http://www.contactmusic.com/in-depth/jennifer-lope...
Where does it stop?
"Boris and Dave skip through the tulips at the behest of Putin"
"BoDa mud wrestle for Kim Yung Un"
All parties should be open about funding.
This, however is not dignified. Smacks of J-Lo's appearance in Turkmenistan (I'm sure someone else did the same a year earlier and blamed her poor research)
http://www.contactmusic.com/in-depth/jennifer-lope...
Where does it stop?
"Boris and Dave skip through the tulips at the behest of Putin"
"BoDa mud wrestle for Kim Yung Un"
Rude-boy said:
The one thing I would mention is that at least 99.999% of the people who funs the Conservatives know that they are doing so and are happy to do so.
Not something that the Labour party (who are well known for their squeaky clean fund raising aren't they!) can say about the source of their funds...
http://www.unitetheunion.org/campaigning/unitepoli...Not something that the Labour party (who are well known for their squeaky clean fund raising aren't they!) can say about the source of their funds...
Hardly hidden is it?
wolves_wanderer said:
Didn't say it was hidden. I mean a large charity fund raiser is hardly hidden. Nope I have no problems with the visibility of that source of Labour Party funding at all. More that if you want to be part of the union you will be funding the Labour party if you like it or not.
Not sure I can think of many instances where a failure/refusal to fund the Conservative Party could lead to a disadvantage in the workplace.
Rude-boy said:
More that if you want to be part of the union you will be funding the Labour party if you like it or not.
Not sure I can think of many instances where a failure/refusal to fund the Conservative Party could lead to a disadvantage in the workplace.
Unless you exercise your legal right to opt-out of the proportion of your subscription that would otherwise go to funding Labour. Thus maintaining all benefits of union membership apart from the warm glow of funding Ed's bunch of halfwitsNot sure I can think of many instances where a failure/refusal to fund the Conservative Party could lead to a disadvantage in the workplace.
wolves_wanderer said:
Rude-boy said:
The one thing I would mention is that at least 99.999% of the people who funs the Conservatives know that they are doing so and are happy to do so.
Not something that the Labour party (who are well known for their squeaky clean fund raising aren't they!) can say about the source of their funds...
http://www.unitetheunion.org/campaigning/unitepoli...Not something that the Labour party (who are well known for their squeaky clean fund raising aren't they!) can say about the source of their funds...
Hardly hidden is it?
When I joined the AEEU, (which became part of Amicus and now Unite), I was pretty much press-ganged when I was an apprentice. I had no idea that I was making this payment, or that I could opt out, for several years. When I found out, I immediately wrote to my branch to get it stopped. I spoke with some of my colleagues, many of whom had been members for years, and they knew nothing about it. I typed up a letter with spaces for members to fill in the blanks, photocopied it and left one in everybody's pigeon-holes, much to the annoyance of the shop steward.
I later became a rep but always made it clear I would be politically neutral in my actions. I was staying at Esher Place while I was doing the IOSH managing safely and the General Secretary, Derek Simpson, was there at the same time for a conference. I also managed to gain his attention by distributing a few of my photocopies about in the bar. I had quite a heated exchange with him, during which I pointed out as a paid-up member, I had the right to have a voice.
If you look through the membership paperwork for details of the political levy, it is in there, but it is buried amongst the b*ll*cks. If they invited members to make a contribution to the Labour Party, it would be fine, however, their method is to keep quiet when you sign up and leave it up to you to opt out - that is if you ever realise.
Ganglandboss said:
I later became a rep but always made it clear I would be politically neutral in my actions. I was staying at Esher Place while I was doing the IOSH managing safely and the General Secretary, Derek Simpson, was there at the same time for a conference. I also managed to gain his attention by distributing a few of my photocopies about in the bar. I had quite a heated exchange with him, during which I pointed out as a paid-up member, I had the right to have a voice.
Like most union bigwigs he knows a) what's good for him & b) what's good for him. You don't get there by being a tireless representative of the members and fighting their corner.wolves_wanderer said:
No it's not, Labours embezzlement of tax payers money via Unite is well reported.http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/7473683/U...
I thought it was illegal for foreigners to fund UK political parties?
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/jul/28/for...
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/jul/28/for...
BlackLabel said:
I thought it was illegal for foreigners to fund UK political parties?
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/jul/28/for...
They probably get a British passport for their 160khttp://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/jul/28/for...
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff