Done Better than Expected - That will be £1.7bn then - WTF!

Done Better than Expected - That will be £1.7bn then - WTF!

Author
Discussion

Beati Dogu

8,911 posts

140 months

Sunday 26th October 2014
quotequote all
McWigglebum4th said:
This bothers me

As he actually believes we are dumb enough to fall for this
He knows we're dumb enough to fall for it. The "act tough, sell the country out at every opportunity" tactic had been standard Tory operating procedure for decades.

At least the Lib Dems make no secret they're a bunch of traitors who have zero allegiance to this country.

XJ Flyer

5,526 posts

131 months

Sunday 26th October 2014
quotequote all
Four Litre said:
McWigglebum4th said:
I find Camerons "hardman" language interesting

He sayes that the UK will not pay the bill by the first of december


It is the time frame that i find grabbing my intention


When i get a large and completely unjustifiable bill i say i am not paying it


I never say i will not pay it by date X


We are going to pay this £1.7billion just on the instalment plan
Exactly what I understood from that. There wasnt a word of "I'm not paying this bill" it was "Im not paying this bill on time!" - So day after the 1st Dec then!!!

When this gets paid, Cameron is (burnt) toast and UKIP support with surge.
If it hasn't surged on the basis of what we've paid into the scam since 1973 then a few extra billions probably won't change the minds of the EU supporters.IE if they believe that we can lose a trade war resulting from withdrawal when we're in a position of being in a trade deficit they'll swallow anything.

XJ Flyer

5,526 posts

131 months

Sunday 26th October 2014
quotequote all
Beati Dogu said:
He knows we're dumb enough to fall for it. The "act tough, sell the country out at every opportunity" tactic had been standard Tory operating procedure for decades.

At least the Lib Dems make no secret they're a bunch of traitors who have zero allegiance to this country.
^ This and that applied wether it was Heath or Thatcher.

Tyre Tread

10,539 posts

217 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
How quickly the lessons from "Yes Prime Minister".

Cameron disparately needs a boost in the polls. Sets up this situation with his Euro mates so he can act the hard man and win respect and votes. He will be seen to tell thye rest of europe to go hand themselves for the money.

The pay off is he will pay it after the election.

Any bets?

smegmore

3,091 posts

177 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
Tyre Tread said:
How quickly the lessons from "Yes Prime Minister".

Cameron disparately needs a boost in the polls. Sets up this situation with his Euro mates so he can act the hard man and win respect and votes. He will be seen to tell thye rest of europe to go hand themselves for the money.

The pay off is he will pay it after the election.

Any bets?
It's the same scenario as his last spat with Joncker. The following day they were high-fiving and blowing kisses at each other.

Tough talk is easy.

robm3

4,930 posts

228 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
Tyre Tread said:
How quickly the lessons from "Yes Prime Minister".

Cameron disparately needs a boost in the polls. Sets up this situation with his Euro mates so he can act the hard man and win respect and votes. He will be seen to tell thye rest of europe to go hand themselves for the money.

The pay off is he will pay it after the election.

Any bets?
The one fly in the ointment is Farage, and his straight talking common sense.

"Why, wouldn't it be a shame if some fanatic 'knocked him off? Sure he's the backbone of that whole damn UKIP thing....."

I can just see that thought go through a few political power broker's minds, although naturally, that's never been done by upstanding governments or their respective departments, not even when there's billions of euros at stake, and they'd be out of power, and perhaps even revealed, why no, never, of course not....

CrutyRammers

13,735 posts

199 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
smegmore said:
Tyre Tread said:
How quickly the lessons from "Yes Prime Minister".

Cameron disparately needs a boost in the polls. Sets up this situation with his Euro mates so he can act the hard man and win respect and votes. He will be seen to tell thye rest of europe to go hand themselves for the money.

The pay off is he will pay it after the election.

Any bets?
It's the same scenario as his last spat with Joncker. The following day they were high-fiving and blowing kisses at each other.

Tough talk is easy.
Yep, same old, same old. And the people and the media will lap it up.

Adrian W

13,902 posts

229 months

Tuesday 28th October 2014
quotequote all
They were talking about this on LBC this morning, and were saying this has more to do with the Rochester by election and politics, the amount requested cannot be a surprise to the treasury or number 10 and is based on the same formula that Thatcher negotiated, if we don't pay there is a big risk that the EU ask for the rebate back, we may also be asked to state why we have been repeatedly understating our GDP.

XJ Flyer

5,526 posts

131 months

Tuesday 28th October 2014
quotequote all
Adrian W said:
They were talking about this on LBC this morning, and were saying this has more to do with the Rochester by election and politics, the amount requested cannot be a surprise to the treasury or number 10 and is based on the same formula that Thatcher negotiated, if we don't pay there is a big risk that the EU ask for the rebate back, we may also be asked to state why we have been repeatedly understating our GDP.
The problem is actually a much more recent change in the way that GDP is calculated ( rigged ) no surprise in favour of making the government's economic policies look better than they are.The 'changes' were already the subject of a warning by the ONS that they would affect our EU contribution calculations.The choice is now simply are we prepared to accept the continuing throwing away billions of pounds,this surcharge just being a part,or dump the project by withdrawing.'Withdrawing' in this case also meaning telling the EU to get stuffed no more money and if that involves trade sanctions then we impose trade sanctions in retaliation in a trade war which we can't possibly lose in a situation where they sell more to us than we sell to them.


Edited by XJ Flyer on Tuesday 28th October 13:24

Hol

8,419 posts

201 months

Tuesday 28th October 2014
quotequote all
Wikipedia said:
The European Economic Community (EEC) was an international organization created by the Treaty of Rome of 1957.[1]

Its aim was to bring about economic integration, including a common market, among its six founding members: Belgium, France, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and West Germany. The EEC was also known as the Common Market in the English-speaking world and sometimes referred to as the European Community even before it was officially renamed as such in 1993.

It gained a common set of institutions along with the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) and the European Atomic Energy Community (EURATOM) as one of the European Communities under the 1965 Merger Treaty (Treaty of Brussels).

Upon the entry into force of the Maastricht Treaty in 1993, the EEC was renamed the European Community (EC) to reflect that it covered a wider range of policy. This was also when the three European Communities, including the EC, were collectively made to constitute the first of the three pillars of the European Union (EU), which the treaty also founded. The EC existed in this form until it was abolished by the 2009 Treaty of Lisbon
We joined the EEC late in 1973, to allow us to trade with Europe without issue. France vetoed us on a number of occasions before we got in, as our inclusion diluted their own control and they (DeGaulle) were scared of our relationship with the US.

Without that membership at the time, our economy would have suffered as Germany and France would have frozen the UK out of european community commercial contracts and also 'could' have used EEC powers to tax uk imports to member countries.

It all looks to have gone wrong in 1993, when the unelected bureaucrats were given more power and the accounts stopped balancing.


Hol

8,419 posts

201 months

Tuesday 28th October 2014
quotequote all
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2487670/Au...


This is the problem,

The EEC unelected civil servants had so little oversight over their actions, that they diverted huge sums of money to dubious causes.

Funny how France and Lux benefitted though???

An that Is 19 Years!!


dailymail said:
Auditors refuse to give EU accounts a clean bill of health for 19th year in a row as rate of unexplained spending rises 23%... with UK liable for £800m

LucreLout

908 posts

119 months

Tuesday 28th October 2014
quotequote all
robm3 said:
The one fly in the ointment is Farage, and his straight talking common sense.

"Why, wouldn't it be a shame if some fanatic 'knocked him off? Sure he's the backbone of that whole damn UKIP thing....."

I can just see that thought go through a few political power broker's minds, although naturally, that's never been done by upstanding governments or their respective departments, not even when there's billions of euros at stake, and they'd be out of power, and perhaps even revealed, why no, never, of course not....
I've never voted UKIP and I don't intend to next year; but if Farage dies before the election I'll vote for UKIP. (Nowt against ya Nige, I just don't want the cigarette smoking man to visit you).

Tyre Tread

10,539 posts

217 months

Tuesday 28th October 2014
quotequote all
LucreLout said:
I've never voted UKIP and I don't intend to next year; but if Farage dies before the election I'll vote for UKIP. (Nowt against ya Nige, I just don't want the cigarette smoking man to visit you).
confused

Esseesse

8,969 posts

209 months

Tuesday 28th October 2014
quotequote all
Tyre Tread said:
LucreLout said:
I've never voted UKIP and I don't intend to next year; but if Farage dies before the election I'll vote for UKIP. (Nowt against ya Nige, I just don't want the cigarette smoking man to visit you).
confused
He's saying he doesn't want to tempt fate. I think.

It has crossed my mind a few times that being Mr Farage must come with a not insignificant amount of personal risk. There are many many powerful people whose lives would be easier if he weren't about. Having said that, I'm surprised we also don't hear more about terror threats at the EU parliament. A not insignificant number of Europe's 500M residents have more than a strong dislike for it.

johnxjsc1985

15,948 posts

165 months

Tuesday 28th October 2014
quotequote all
Tyre Tread said:
confused
I will second yourconfused

Guybrush

4,358 posts

207 months

Tuesday 28th October 2014
quotequote all
johnxjsc1985 said:
Tyre Tread said:
confused
I will second yourconfused
X Files I think.

Anyway, he was in a light aircraft a few years ago, which crashed. rolleyes He got away with light injuries.

XJ Flyer

5,526 posts

131 months

Tuesday 28th October 2014
quotequote all
Hol said:
Wikipedia said:
The European Economic Community (EEC) was an international organization created by the Treaty of Rome of 1957.[1]

Its aim was to bring about economic integration, including a common market, among its six founding members: Belgium, France, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and West Germany. The EEC was also known as the Common Market in the English-speaking world and sometimes referred to as the European Community even before it was officially renamed as such in 1993.

It gained a common set of institutions along with the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) and the European Atomic Energy Community (EURATOM) as one of the European Communities under the 1965 Merger Treaty (Treaty of Brussels).

Upon the entry into force of the Maastricht Treaty in 1993, the EEC was renamed the European Community (EC) to reflect that it covered a wider range of policy. This was also when the three European Communities, including the EC, were collectively made to constitute the first of the three pillars of the European Union (EU), which the treaty also founded. The EC existed in this form until it was abolished by the 2009 Treaty of Lisbon
We joined the EEC late in 1973, to allow us to trade with Europe without issue. France vetoed us on a number of occasions before we got in, as our inclusion diluted their own control and they (DeGaulle) were scared of our relationship with the US.

Without that membership at the time, our economy would have suffered as Germany and France would have frozen the UK out of european community commercial contracts and also 'could' have used EEC powers to tax uk imports to member countries.

It all looks to have gone wrong in 1993, when the unelected bureaucrats were given more power and the accounts stopped balancing.
The fact is it all went wrong from the start in what was effectively a case of Heath and the rest of the Europhile Cons caving into EEC blackmail in the form of trade threats.When it is obvious that trade sanctions aren't a monopoly just held by the EU.What we should have done in 1973 was to impose trade sanctions against the EEC rather than allowing ourselves to be blackmailed into join it.In which case they had/have far more to lose in such a trade war than we had/have as our trade deficit with Europe since proves.As for closer integration the anti EEC side in 1972 already knew and had already shown that was always going to be the aim of the EEC from day 1.


Edited by XJ Flyer on Tuesday 28th October 17:22

richie99

1,116 posts

187 months

Tuesday 28th October 2014
quotequote all
XJ Flyer said:
Beati Dogu said:
He knows we're dumb enough to fall for it. The "act tough, sell the country out at every opportunity" tactic had been standard Tory operating procedure for decades.

At least the Lib Dems make no secret they're a bunch of traitors who have zero allegiance to this country.
^ This and that applied wether it was Heath or Thatcher.
I admit I hate Heath for his duplicity but wasn't it Wilson who said he was going to be tough, renegotiate the UK terms and then hold a referendum? He duly toddled off to Brussels, gained no concessions, got the French to moan about how much they had to give away and then won the referendum.

Sorry to upset your trademark anti Conservative rant. I'm not even going to start on the Thatcher comment.

XJ Flyer

5,526 posts

131 months

Tuesday 28th October 2014
quotequote all
richie99 said:
XJ Flyer said:
Beati Dogu said:
He knows we're dumb enough to fall for it. The "act tough, sell the country out at every opportunity" tactic had been standard Tory operating procedure for decades.

At least the Lib Dems make no secret they're a bunch of traitors who have zero allegiance to this country.
^ This and that applied wether it was Heath or Thatcher.
I admit I hate Heath for his duplicity but wasn't it Wilson who said he was going to be tough, renegotiate the UK terms and then hold a referendum? He duly toddled off to Brussels, gained no concessions, got the French to moan about how much they had to give away and then won the referendum.

Sorry to upset your trademark anti Conservative rant. I'm not even going to start on the Thatcher comment.
What actually happened was that there were more euro sceptics in the Labour Party than there were amongst the Conservatives.Which as I've said is one of the main reasons why Powell turned against the Cons in the hope that the euro sceptic side of the Labour party would win out.I think that Wilson,together with others like Jenkins,was clear enough about his support of EEC membership both before and during the referendum.The inconvenient truth for the Cons being that Thatcher was no less supportive and duplicit in being part of the leadership,of the cross Party propaganda barrage,which swung the vote in favour of continuing membership,than Heath was.The difference being that,unlike Thatcher and now Cameron,Heath never tried to make any pretence about his typically Europhile Con Party support of the EU membership agenda.

http://robertsaunders.wdfiles.com/local--files/bri...

http://thecroydoncitizen.com/wp-content/uploads/20...

condor

8,837 posts

249 months

Monday 3rd November 2014
quotequote all
I thought I heard on the TV news today that if we don't pay up we'll be charged £3.5Million interest each month.