425k, yours for ****** an undercover cop
Discussion
RegMolehusband said:
My sympathy is with the woman having listened to her on the news last night. I don't think this deserves any Daily Mail like outrages. A fair ruling.
Why, reading the BBC article the money was paid out to protect the reputations of the senior officers involve, and not necessarily to compensate the "victims" I am not sure it's enough money.
I am glad I am not Gilbert's on the job cover offspring.
What's the difference between a police officer fathering a child while maintaining a cover story and rape?
Did Animal Rights Activists require such deep undercover penetration?
How does police officer Gilbert fathering a child with 'Jackie' compare to the stuff that some of the more extreme Animal Rights activists did with regard to Cambridge Life Sciences or whatever the firm's called?
I am glad I am not Gilbert's on the job cover offspring.
What's the difference between a police officer fathering a child while maintaining a cover story and rape?
Did Animal Rights Activists require such deep undercover penetration?
How does police officer Gilbert fathering a child with 'Jackie' compare to the stuff that some of the more extreme Animal Rights activists did with regard to Cambridge Life Sciences or whatever the firm's called?
carinaman said:
I am not sure it's enough money.
I am glad I am not Gilbert's on the job cover offspring.
What's the difference between a police officer fathering a child while maintaining a cover story and rape?
Did Animal Rights Activists require such deep undercover penetration?
How does police officer Gilbert fathering a child with 'Jackie' compare to the stuff that some of the more extreme Animal Rights activists did with regard to Cambridge Life Sciences or whatever the firm's called?
I am glad I am not Gilbert's on the job cover offspring.
What's the difference between a police officer fathering a child while maintaining a cover story and rape?
Did Animal Rights Activists require such deep undercover penetration?
How does police officer Gilbert fathering a child with 'Jackie' compare to the stuff that some of the more extreme Animal Rights activists did with regard to Cambridge Life Sciences or whatever the firm's called?
I think the poor woman deserves compensation but I also feel the officer should be penalised unless his contract specifically states having sexual relations resulting in offspring is part of the deal.
grumbledoak said:
Ideally the father should have paid for his kid's upbringing, but I can see that might have been tricky.
Or he could have resorted to one or more of the many forms of contraception available.Fathering kids was not part of his job, therefore the taxpayer shouldn't have to pick up the tab.
If you or I commit some terrible crime, say even doubling the speed limit on an deserted M-way, the police will front up some BiB Talking Head to say that the ban and fine set a strong deterrent to others that such driving will not be tolerated.....
I don't think £425K sets enough of an example.
I also don't think the Met have demonstrated contriteness either.
I don't think £425K sets enough of an example.
I also don't think the Met have demonstrated contriteness either.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff