Prince Andrew in US sex lawsuit - impropriety with minors!

Prince Andrew in US sex lawsuit - impropriety with minors!

Author
Discussion

pincher

Original Poster:

5,721 posts

165 months

Friday 2nd January 2015
quotequote all
Breaking on BBC website now....

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30659629

I'd like to dismiss it out of hand but they are a bit of a weird bunch aren't they (the Royals, not Americans)

Edit - a bit more detail on the Telegraph site - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/theroyalfam...

Edited by pincher on Friday 2nd January 15:52

Lost soul

8,712 posts

130 months

Friday 2nd January 2015
quotequote all
He is mates with a known pedo I seem to remember

SpeckledJim

20,133 posts

201 months

Friday 2nd January 2015
quotequote all
Lost soul said:
He is mates with a known pedo I seem to remember
Plaintiff was 17 at the time of the alleged, so it's not a 'pedo' issue.

Mojocvh

16,837 posts

210 months

Friday 2nd January 2015
quotequote all
No not this Royale..



This one


"Suggestion of impropriety with minors untrue," says Buckingham Palace after Prince Andrew named in US sex lawsuit"

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30659629

I do hope that this is untrue, not for his sake but for his parents.

Edited by Mojocvh on Friday 2nd January 15:57

BlackLabel

12,468 posts

71 months

Friday 2nd January 2015
quotequote all
These allegations have been around for a while.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1361039/Pr...

It's in connection to his peado friend Jeffrey Epstein.

jogon

2,971 posts

106 months

Friday 2nd January 2015
quotequote all
SpeckledJim said:
Plaintiff was 17 at the time of the alleged, so it's not a 'pedo' issue.
It is in Florida, according to the Telegraph, still considered a minor.

SpeckledJim

20,133 posts

201 months

Friday 2nd January 2015
quotequote all
jogon said:
SpeckledJim said:
Plaintiff was 17 at the time of the alleged, so it's not a 'pedo' issue.
It is in Florida, according to the Telegraph, still considered a minor.
Which is not necessarily anything to do with paedophilia.

A paedophile won't be interested in a post-pubescent 17 year old.

Lost soul

8,712 posts

130 months

Friday 2nd January 2015
quotequote all
SpeckledJim said:
Lost soul said:
He is mates with a known pedo I seem to remember
Plaintiff was 17 at the time of the alleged, so it's not a 'pedo' issue.
Would that not be statutory rape then

irocfan

21,270 posts

138 months

Friday 2nd January 2015
quotequote all
I'm not fan of the inbred lot of them but I'd be amazed if this were true - you're talking about one of the most famous men on the earth who could have his pick of the majority of women he desired...

Mobile Chicane

19,012 posts

160 months

Friday 2nd January 2015
quotequote all
He wasn't known as Randy Andy for nothing.

Lost soul

8,712 posts

130 months

Friday 2nd January 2015
quotequote all
irocfan said:
I'm not fan of the inbred lot of them but I'd be amazed if this were true - you're talking about one of the most famous men on the earth who could have his pick of the majority of women he desired...
do you think pedos pick kids out of choice

SpeckledJim

20,133 posts

201 months

Friday 2nd January 2015
quotequote all
Lost soul said:
SpeckledJim said:
Lost soul said:
He is mates with a known pedo I seem to remember
Plaintiff was 17 at the time of the alleged, so it's not a 'pedo' issue.
Would that not be statutory rape then
No idea.

Boris Morris

496 posts

92 months

Friday 2nd January 2015
quotequote all
Lost soul said:
do you think pedos pick kids out of choice
Is 17 a child?

Lost soul

8,712 posts

130 months

Friday 2nd January 2015
quotequote all
Boris Morris said:
Lost soul said:
do you think pedos pick kids out of choice
Is 17 a child?
Legal I think so

tim0409

2,726 posts

107 months

Friday 2nd January 2015
quotequote all
SpeckledJim said:
Lost soul said:
SpeckledJim said:
Lost soul said:
He is mates with a known pedo I seem to remember
Plaintiff was 17 at the time of the alleged, so it's not a 'pedo' issue.
Would that not be statutory rape then
No idea.
From wiki -

The age of consent in Florida is 18,[61] but close-in-age exemptions exist. By law, the exception permits a person 23 years of age or younger to engage in legal sexual activity with a minor aged 16 or 17.

794.05 Unlawful sexual activity with certain minors.-- (1) A person 24 years of age or older who engages in sexual activity with a person 16 or 17 years of age commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

I remember this story surfacing a few years ago when Ghislaine Maxwell (daughter of Robert) was questioned in relation to "procuring" girls for Epstein, something she strongly denied.

rich1231

17,261 posts

208 months

Friday 2nd January 2015
quotequote all
Mobile Chicane said:
He wasn't known as Randy Andy for nothing.
Most people can be promiscuous without being interested in children.

I think your remark is unreasonable.

irocfan

21,270 posts

138 months

Friday 2nd January 2015
quotequote all
Lost soul said:
irocfan said:
I'm not fan of the inbred lot of them but I'd be amazed if this were true - you're talking about one of the most famous men on the earth who could have his pick of the majority of women he desired...
do you think pedos pick kids out of choice
absolutely not - but 17 (by our, that is to say UK, standards) ain't a paedo. There is a WORLD of difference between someone who shags someone underage (15/17 depending on legal jurisdiction) and someone who interferes with early teens and younger

tim0409

2,726 posts

107 months

Friday 2nd January 2015
quotequote all
irocfan said:
Lost soul said:
irocfan said:
I'm not fan of the inbred lot of them but I'd be amazed if this were true - you're talking about one of the most famous men on the earth who could have his pick of the majority of women he desired...
do you think pedos pick kids out of choice
absolutely not - but 17 (by our, that is to say UK, standards) ain't a paedo. There is a WORLD of difference between someone who shags someone underage (15/17 depending on legal jurisdiction) and someone who interferes with early teens and younger
I think it's called ephebophilia - I remember it being discussed on here in relation to JS.

Moonhawk

10,713 posts

167 months

Friday 2nd January 2015
quotequote all
jogon said:
SpeckledJim said:
Plaintiff was 17 at the time of the alleged, so it's not a 'pedo' issue.
It is in Florida, according to the Telegraph, still considered a minor.
A person of 17 is still considered a minor in the UK too. The age at which somebody is considered "full age" in the UK is 18.

Also - paedophilia is a precise medical term - not a legal one. Nobody has ever been prosecuted for "paedophilia".


Edited by Moonhawk on Friday 2nd January 17:07

98elise

15,262 posts

109 months

Friday 2nd January 2015
quotequote all
SpeckledJim said:
jogon said:
SpeckledJim said:
Plaintiff was 17 at the time of the alleged, so it's not a 'pedo' issue.
It is in Florida, according to the Telegraph, still considered a minor.
Which is not necessarily anything to do with paedophilia.

A paedophile won't be interested in a post-pubescent 17 year old.
A lot of people don't seem to realise this, otherwise there would be a lot of 16 and 17 year olds in jail!