Prince Andrew US civil sexual assault case
Discussion
Cold said:
Dear Andrew,
If one walks like a duck and quacks, one is a duck.
Yours,
Everyone
b
hstewie said:
hstewie said: I did think that though I don't know if sometimes you see these things if you look for them.
I'd have expected a much more equivocal "Clear error of judgement on my part".
It leaves a lot of room for doubt IMO.
It’s the bit about not witnessing the behaviour that led to his conviction. I'd have expected a much more equivocal "Clear error of judgement on my part".
It leaves a lot of room for doubt IMO.
Q. Andrew, what behaviour did you witness and take part in?
A. I didn’t witness the kind of behaviour that subsequently led to his arrest and conviction.
You know what is odd? That statement is just a series of checklists as if trying to ensure everything is covered.
You can see how they would write and rewrite a line at a time.
Reminds me of when I'm trying to explain why something has gone wrong and trying to not get the company sued.
You can see how they would write and rewrite a line at a time.
Reminds me of when I'm trying to explain why something has gone wrong and trying to not get the company sued.
vonuber said:
You know what is odd? That statement is just a series of checklists as if trying to ensure everything is covered.
You can see how they would write and rewrite a line at a time.
Reminds me of when I'm trying to explain why something has gone wrong and trying to not get the company sued.
Well yes.You can see how they would write and rewrite a line at a time.
Reminds me of when I'm trying to explain why something has gone wrong and trying to not get the company sued.
I used to have a girlfriend who was a lawyer. I think if I was in a situation where I was having to explain something without incriminating myself too much and I made that kind of statement, she called it “wilfully withholding the truth”
Still it’s a statement not an answer so maybe it’s not too dishonest, or dishonest at all.
El stovey said:
bhstewie said:
hstewie said: I did think that though I don't know if sometimes you see these things if you look for them.
I'd have expected a much more equivocal "Clear error of judgement on my part".
It leaves a lot of room for doubt IMO.
It’s the bit about not witnessing the behaviour that led to his conviction. I'd have expected a much more equivocal "Clear error of judgement on my part".
It leaves a lot of room for doubt IMO.
Q. Andrew, what behaviour did you witness and take part in?
A. I didn’t witness the kind of behaviour that subsequently led to his arrest and conviction.
Based on that statement it's not going to go away.
If Andy thinks that statement will draw a line under this sordid affair then he is seriously mistaken.
Just another leech who thinks rules and laws don’t apply because of what family he was born into and expects us plebs to just carry on and believe his nonsense and not to have the temerity to question his actions.
Man’s a moron.
Just another leech who thinks rules and laws don’t apply because of what family he was born into and expects us plebs to just carry on and believe his nonsense and not to have the temerity to question his actions.
Man’s a moron.
That statement is a bit like a ropey 3rd party warranty provider - not worth the paper it is written on..
Of course he is going to say he didn't see anything - if he did, he isn't going to admit it and if he did admit it that's game over for him. I genuinely see that as a statement of guilt and as much as I think the Daily Mail is the worst of the worst I'm glad they are dredging up stories to take him down.
Of course he is going to say he didn't see anything - if he did, he isn't going to admit it and if he did admit it that's game over for him. I genuinely see that as a statement of guilt and as much as I think the Daily Mail is the worst of the worst I'm glad they are dredging up stories to take him down.
Zirconia said:
Lots of people didn't know Epstein.
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/state/florida/art...
"Those who did comment often said they were in the book because of their ties to Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s socialite girlfriend, alleged enabler and business associate.https://www.miamiherald.com/news/state/florida/art...
Ghislaine’s father Robert Maxwell was a venerable British newspaper publisher and former member of parliament who named his yacht the Lady Ghislaine."
How did I not know this, must be living a sheltered life.
desolate said:
Didn't realise that the charge that Epstein admitted was for pimping a 14 yr old - didn't realise she was THAT young.
Just hows our royal family for what they are.
No, that's the charge that the federal prosecution - led by acosta, who ended up trump's labour Secretary - the trump who is a co accused of raping another 13 yr old girl - ended up agreeing to sweetheart charge him while waving the dozens of other charges and granting immunity to all the potential conspirators - agreed with him as a plea.Just hows our royal family for what they are.
Oh, while not telling or agreeing it with the victims, as required by law.
This whole thing stinks.
yonex said:
Cold said:
Dear Andrew,If one walks like a duck and quacks, one is a duck.
Yours,
Everyone
Got to the end, oh, nope, it's for real (that was when I really laughed!)
Wonder how many flunkey-hours it took to write that load of old horse-s
t?
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff