Prince Andrew US civil sexual assault case

[anonymous-user]

Ayahuasca said:

DeepEnd said:

I think I read he saw Atlantic Conveyor hit by the exocets form his Sea King.

Blimey - who knew that he sank the Atlantic Conveyor? How on Earth was that covered up?

Standard Space Lizard conspiracy playbook.

[jakesmith]

Welshbeef said:

I’d struggle to remember what I was doing on a set date on a weekend x months ago let alone 18 years.

Just check that date’s postings on ph
Odds on you were deliberately annoying someone!

[vonuber]

Breadvan72 said:

I am not sure that I get yours.

Apologia for middle aged men who perv on teenaged women seem a tad frequent here. Is it a company director thing?

Ego probably. "I may be bald, fat and over 50 but those teenage girls will still want a bit of this! Just wait til i list my IT directorships at them!"

[Stay in Bed Instead]

Randy Winkman said:

I wouldn't hang around with a convicted paedophile. Would you?

And again, would it be unlawful to do so?

[Welshbeef]

Breadvan72 said:

Welshbeef said:

The girl in the picture was physically 17 but looked older 18-20 ish.

But yea get your point.

I am not sure that I get yours.

Apologia for middle aged men who perv on teenaged women seem a tad frequent here. Is it a company director thing?

He was 41 she physically was 17 but looked older 18-20

I have two friends who are late thirties and married to very young 20’s. One of those was divorced and simply couldn’t find anyone his own age group (if you like) so opened the age range so to speak. All happily married.

[Welshbeef]

jakesmith said:

Welshbeef said:

I’d struggle to remember what I was doing on a set date on a weekend x months ago let alone 18 years.

Just check that date’s postings on ph
Odds on you were deliberately annoying someone!

You joined nearly 10 years ago me just over twelve. But you can post here from any location so relying on this as evidence that you were anything but “how’s yer father” or knee trembler with someone is weak.

[vonuber]

Stay in Bed Instead said:

And again, would it be unlawful to do so?

No, but it would raise some interesting questions wouldn't it.

[Stay in Bed Instead]

vonuber said:

No, but it would raise some interesting questions wouldn't it.

Yes, it may with some.

[AW111]

Breadvan72 said:

When I get banned I want to come back as someone who is obsessively racist but only about people from Scarborough.

Going around stinking of sage, thyme and other herbs, keeping us all awake with their so-called "fair" - down with the lot of them.

[BadBull]

Sten. said:

Turn7 said:

Pinoyuk is Yipper isnt it ?

(quick check of the posting history)

Absolutely, 100%.

Seems like he's been banned again.

Whether he was yipper or not, he was rather odd.

[JagLover]

Welshbeef said:

He was 41 she physically was 17 but looked older 18-20

I have two friends who are late thirties and married to very young 20’s. One of those was divorced and simply couldn’t find anyone his own age group (if you like) so opened the age range so to speak. All happily married.

I know similar couples, who seem perfectly happy.

Worth bearing in mind that one of the most important points of marriage for many people is to have children. So while society might push such men toward women closer to their own age nature points them toward girls rather younger.

[vonuber]

Stay in Bed Instead said:

Yes, it may with some.

Like staying friends with Jeffrey Epstein. In fact if you were a high profile ambassador and son of head of the state, it could raise even more questions as to your continued association, if not your association in the first place.

[Stay in Bed Instead]

vonuber said:

Like staying friends with Jeffrey Epstein. In fact if you were a high profile ambassador and son of head of the state, it could raise even more questions as to your continued association, if not your association in the first place.

But does that make Andrew guilty of anything, other than being foolish?

[BadBull]

Ask yourself why he stayed friends with him, when he was surely advised to cut all ties.

What was in it for Andrew to defy family orders and risk public derision, by staying friends with him?

What was the upside for Andrew?

[Stay in Bed Instead]

BadBull said:

Ask yourself why he stayed friends with him, when he was surely advised to cut all ties.

What was in it for Andrew to defy family orders and risk public derision, by staying friends with him?

What was the upside for Andrew?

You mean guilty by association?

What family orders, can you reference them?

[BadBull]

Stay in Bed Instead said:

You mean guilty by association?

What family orders, can you reference them?

Answer my questions first please.

[Stay in Bed Instead]

BadBull said:

Answer my questions first please.

Your questions make statements that you cannot know are true.

Surely it's up to Andrew to decide who he is friends with?

Why do you think there must be some ulterior motive to it?

[BadBull]

You lack of answers has provided my answer.

Thanks.

[Stay in Bed Instead]

BadBull said:

You lack of answers has provided my answer.

Thanks.

Which is what exactly?

[Gameface]

Stay in Bed Instead said:

Which is what exactly?

Your clearly being obtuse for the sake of it.