Prince Andrew US civil sexual assault case

[vonuber]

NoNeed said:

e wasn't a convicted paedophile. He may have been one for all I know but not a convicted one.

And you know why he wasn't convicted? Have you actually looked into that, and as to why he was arrested again?

[Tyre Smoke]

vonuber said:

NoNeed said:

e wasn't a convicted paedophile. He may have been one for all I know but not a convicted one.

And you know why he wasn't convicted? Have you actually looked into that, and as to why he was arrested again?

I'm going to stick my neck out here and précis, money?

[vonuber]

Tyre Smoke said:

I'm going to stick my neck out here and précis, money?

Probably more like connections to others.

[Tyre Smoke]

HRH has never been told 'no' in his life. He has always been on a hiding to nothing, big brother Wing Nut was never going to give up his succession so HRH has had nothing better to do other than indulge himself in whatever he pleases.

Nephew Harry was similar and may yet go off the rails.

HRH has made a conscious decision to keep close contact with Epstein after his conviction. There's a reason for that,and it's not because he thought Epstein was innocent.

[Zirconia]

vonuber said:

Tyre Smoke said:

I'm going to stick my neck out here and précis, money?

Probably more like connections to others.

The two are most certainly linked I think. Look back to who and how he interacted, how he got the deal via Acosta, Barrs father getting him a job at a college, it really is a convoluted way they interacted.

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article2220...

7 minutes in if you cannot stomach the run up. This was before he took the easy way out.

[TTmonkey]

Since when did a senior Royal ever before get photographed with his arm around the waist of a young girl? Its just not something that would happen.

This wasn't a passing royalty fan presenting a bouquet of flowers and bowing. Review that photo again and tell me WTF is he doing?

[NoNeed]

vonuber said:

NoNeed said:

e wasn't a convicted paedophile. He may have been one for all I know but not a convicted one.

And you know why he wasn't convicted? Have you actually looked into that, and as to why he was arrested again?

No, but I am willing to bet it had nothing to do with paedophilia

[vonuber]

NoNeed said:

No, but I am willing to bet it had nothing to do with paedophilia

Oh, so why do you think he was arrested?

[Tyre Smoke]

Duh! It's a conspiracy obvs!

[NoNeed]

vonuber said:

NoNeed said:

No, but I am willing to bet it had nothing to do with paedophilia

Oh, so why do you think he was arrested?

Something other than paedophilia

[vonuber]

NoNeed said:

Something other than paedophilia

Like.. what?
And why are you so sure it isn't?

[NoNeed]

vonuber said:

NoNeed said:

Something other than paedophilia

Like.. what?
And why are you so sure it isn't?

Because that is to do with being sexually attracted to pre-pubescent children, the youngest child in the Epstein case was reported as "maybe as young as 14" which would fall in the ephebophilia category.

[vonuber]

NoNeed said:

ecause that is to do with being sexually attracted to pre-pubescent children, the youngest child in the Epstein case was reported as "maybe as young as 14" which would fall in the ephebophilia category.

Oh you were just trying to be clever. Or score a weird internet point.

And it's at least as young as 13, incidentally.

[NoNeed]

vonuber said:

NoNeed said:

ecause that is to do with being sexually attracted to pre-pubescent children, the youngest child in the Epstein case was reported as "maybe as young as 14" which would fall in the ephebophilia category.

Oh you were just trying to be clever.

And it's at least as young as 13, incidentally.

14 was from wiki so not the most reliable source and yes I was

[wc98]

mikal83 said:

Easy assholes like that fat POS andrew dont think any rules/laws etc apply to them.

that's because they don't.

[carinaman]

It's being mentioned on Radio 4's PM.

[Escapegoat]

CoolHands said:

Yes, perhaps he didn’t engage in the same activities. Maybe they liked talking business, who knows. A mate of mine got done for having weed on him, but I still talk to him

Yes, but I'm asking whether YOU would spend time with a convicted paedophile? If you wouldn't (hence the quick deflection to 'smoking weed'), then you know why people here and all over the world are asking questions about PA.

[anonymous-user]

Escapegoat said:

CoolHands said:

Yes, perhaps he didn’t engage in the same activities. Maybe they liked talking business, who knows. A mate of mine got done for having weed on him, but I still talk to him

Yes, but I'm asking whether YOU would spend time with a convicted paedophile? If you wouldn't (hence the quick deflection to 'smoking weed'), then you know why people here and all over the world are asking questions about PA.

If there is one thing we have learned from events of the last few years is that people will connive with and cover up for any manner of sex offender.

Add in the royal sense of entitlement and there we have it .

[Halb]

desolate said:

If there is one thing we have learned from events of the last few years is that people will connive with and cover up for any manner of sex offender.

Add in the royal sense of entitlement and there we have it .

Quite.
It's not something I would have believed outside of the crazy stories that get told by the likes of Alex JOnes, but now...

[Randy Winkman]

Is there a word for "people who are attracted to person's that are not prepubescent but that they know to be under the age of consent (in the relevant country) but decide that they want to have sex with them anyway" ? I'm not sure there is other than generic terms such as "selfish" "wreckless" "inconsiderate" "wanton" "malevolent".