Prince Andrew US civil sexual assault case

Prince Andrew US civil sexual assault case

Author
Discussion

bighop

138 posts

97 months

Friday 15th November 2019
quotequote all
Can't remember meeting her ever, bullstting nonce.

CAPP0

19,583 posts

203 months

Friday 15th November 2019
quotequote all
bighop said:
Andrew said:
Can't remember meeting her ever
I found that statement by him quite damning, and particularly given the photo which has been seen thousands of times. If he was trying to calm things down he's done himself no favours at all.

Has echoes of "I did not have sexual relations with that woman".

scottydoesntknow

860 posts

57 months

Friday 15th November 2019
quotequote all
CAPP0 said:
Has echoes of "I did not have sexual relations with that woman".
Exactly what I thought.

jules_s

4,287 posts

233 months

Friday 15th November 2019
quotequote all
CAPP0 said:
I found that statement by him quite damning, and particularly given the photo which has been seen thousands of times. If he was trying to calm things down he's done himself no favours at all.

Has echoes of "I did not have sexual relations with that woman".
Or the bloke has had his picture taken with countless people/women and just can remember that person

There are many, many pics of me on FB from the 90's and I haven't a clue who i'm with tbh

Esceptico

7,472 posts

109 months

Friday 15th November 2019
quotequote all
I’ve heard a number of stories from people with first hand experience of Prince Andrew. I’ve not heard one that puts him in a positive light (yet).

Long ago (before I had heard stories above) I met him at a business function. I know it is perhaps unfair to judge someone on first impressions but he came across badly. Everything I’ve heard or read since has confirmed what I thought (actually made it worse as I only thought he was a clueless, upper class twit rather than someone so lacking it basic social skills that they would actually befriend (and then maintain friendship) with someone like Epstein.)

anonymous-user

54 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
jules_s said:
CAPP0 said:
I found that statement by him quite damning, and particularly given the photo which has been seen thousands of times. If he was trying to calm things down he's done himself no favours at all.

Has echoes of "I did not have sexual relations with that woman".
Or the bloke has had his picture taken with countless people/women and just can remember that person

There are many, many pics of me on FB from the 90's and I haven't a clue who i'm with tbh
Can you remember who you've slept with though? That's a rhetorical question btw..

This is in a close proximity thing though. He's been going back with Epstein's company every year, is it too many girls he's had?

JuniorD

8,626 posts

223 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
768c said:
jules_s said:
CAPP0 said:
I found that statement by him quite damning, and particularly given the photo which has been seen thousands of times. If he was trying to calm things down he's done himself no favours at all.

Has echoes of "I did not have sexual relations with that woman".
Or the bloke has had his picture taken with countless people/women and just can remember that person

There are many, many pics of me on FB from the 90's and I haven't a clue who i'm with tbh
Can you remember who you've slept with though? That's a rhetorical question btw..

This is in a close proximity thing though. He's been going back with Epstein's company every year, is it too many girls he's had?
Exactly.

You’d need to ride a lot of girls to not know if you did or not. Especially if they were teeny boppers.

anonymous-user

54 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
Is he saying he doesn’t recall meeting the then 17 year old who is in the picture with him that’s been publicised for ages?

If so, it’s certainly an interesting approach to take.

Ridgemont

6,574 posts

131 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
JuniorD said:
768c said:
jules_s said:
CAPP0 said:
I found that statement by him quite damning, and particularly given the photo which has been seen thousands of times. If he was trying to calm things down he's done himself no favours at all.

Has echoes of "I did not have sexual relations with that woman".
Or the bloke has had his picture taken with countless people/women and just can remember that person

There are many, many pics of me on FB from the 90's and I haven't a clue who i'm with tbh
Can you remember who you've slept with though? That's a rhetorical question btw..

This is in a close proximity thing though. He's been going back with Epstein's company every year, is it too many girls he's had?
Exactly.

You’d need to ride a lot of girls to not know if you did or not. Especially if they were teeny boppers.
He didn’t pick up the sobriquet ‘Randy Andy’ due to his interest in a mid twentieth century conservative writer.

anonymous-user

54 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
Ridgemont said:
He didn’t pick up the sobriquet ‘Randy Andy’ due to his interest in a mid twentieth century conservative writer.
biggrin

I don’t think anyone sane would question it.

The Mad Monk

10,474 posts

117 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
Why do I think that he would have been better off with the "No Comment" response to every question?

And of course, not giving an interview in the first place!

Derek Smith

45,662 posts

248 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
La Liga said:
Is he saying he doesn’t recall meeting the then 17 year old who is in the picture with him that’s been publicised for ages?

If so, it’s certainly an interesting approach to take.
If it's just a picture then I reckon it's reasonable for a defence. You must know of some considerably less believable concoctions which have got past a jury.

The idea of being in a picture with someone famous goes back a while. I've got a picture of me with another Windsor, this time Barbara, when I met her at some do. She was giving me a kiss. I doubt she remembers me.

Then again, I was a good looking bloke.



Edited by Derek Smith on Saturday 16th November 09:27

anonymous-user

54 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
The Mad Monk said:
Why do I think that he would have been better off with the "No Comment" response to every question?

And of course, not giving an interview in the first place!
Because his ego is totally out of control?

TTmonkey

20,911 posts

247 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
If she was a girl in a crowd you’d not remember.

But she’s not. She’s a young girl at a billionaire pedos house.

One minute the photos been doctored, now he has no recollection. Needs to make his mind up on what the defence to it is, he’s opened the door to all sorts of allegations by saying he died the recall.

If he was set up or if it was faked he’d have a more positive answer.

She was 17, not 15. He’d probably get away with saying she’d lied about being older and it was a mistake, and that she thought she was a willing participant, and he’d been set up by Epstein.

Now it looks like he knows there’s more evidence to come putting him there but he’s playing the shrug shoulder I can’t recall being balls deep in the sexy young minx defence so it couldn’t have happened.


anonymous-user

54 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
The Mad Monk said:
And of course, not giving an interview in the first place!
I'm guessing mummy has forced him to do it.

anonymous-user

54 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
TTmonkey said:
She was 17, not 15. He’d probably get away with saying she’d lied about being older and it was a mistake, and that she thought she was a willing participant, and he’d been set up by Epstein.
No way. Not at this stage. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if he says he's only ever had sex twice and Fergie got pregnant twice. "Randy Andy" is just a myth you see..

Cupramax

10,480 posts

252 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
I’d love to see a body language expert review the interview. That chortle he did when he said he could kick himself made me cringe.

Wacky Racer

38,162 posts

247 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
I've never liked him. He's spent thousands of pounds of taxpayers money travelling the world on "business trips" to foreign lands on the pre text of "Batting for Britain" rolleyes

However, regarding this, I'm keeping an open mind, the only people who REALLY know what happened are the two individuals themselves.

Regarding THAT photograph, the girl seemed happy enough to be in his company at that time.

TTmonkey

20,911 posts

247 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
Wacky Racer said:
Regarding THAT photograph, the girl seemed happy enough to be in his company at that time.
She might well have been having a good time. But if she was underage (by local law not the law 5000 miles away) and she was being coerced/controlled, then that’s totally irrelevant.


Breaking the law can be great fun.

vonuber

17,868 posts

165 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
Fun fact: he had his own photography room in the basement of Buckingham palace.