Prince Andrew US civil sexual assault case

[Tankrizzo]

Breadvan72 said:

Very quick journey for a Royal, Woking to Up West, as long as you don't ask your dad or your ex sister in law's driver to drive.

Oh you bad, bad man

[anonymous-user]

First 10 minutes were fine for him.

His answers relating to the photograph (arm around the girl) were a disaster.

He seemed blind-sides by the statement he was seen to receive a foot massage.

Interviewer should have probed the sweating bit more (unless there was some editing where she did).

A couple of other minor bits but I thought she did a good job with the interview. Although it’s always easier when you have someone willing to talk who likes to bring a shovel.

It’s on YouTube: https://youtu.be/AKQi3wzNFGQ

[scottydoesntknow]

La Liga said:

It’s on YouTube: https://youtu.be/AKQi3wzNFGQ

Some solid gold in the comments section.

[DeepEnd]

scottydoesntknow said:

Some solid gold in the comments section.

This stands out:

"That photo was taken upstairs, and I’ve never been upstairs.

But I know what upstairs looks like... because, as I've said, I've never been there."

[skwdenyer]

Wacky Racer said:

I just feel sorry for the Queen.

Her offspring are a right shower, but since 1953, she has never put a foot wrong herself, as far as I am aware.

Might one not argue that she’s hardly put a foot right in the child-rearing stakes?

Of course it is an impossible brief she was handed, very young; and I salute her work over the years. Hindsight can be a cruel thing.

[anonymous-user]

scottydoesntknow said:

Some solid gold in the comments section.

Epstein had the most extraordinary way of bring paedo’s from a wide range of backgrounds together.

Yeah talented Andrew, very talented.

[Stay in Bed Instead]

yonex said:

Epstein had the most extraordinary way of bring paedo’s from a wide range of backgrounds together.

Yeah talented Andrew, very talented.

Who else are you accusing of being a paedophile?

[cossy400]

Googles reviews for Pizza Express are rising and rising with people whose memories have been jogged by Andrews current statement.

[anonymous-user]

I am always rather curious about people who go on to websites and say "Mr Dodgy isn't a paedophile, he's an ephebeophile", and such like things.

[Halb]

cossy400 said:

Googles reviews for Pizza Express are rising and rising with people whose memories have been jogged by Andrews current statement.

wouldn't be surprised if we see a PE advert soon, with some sot of crown/prince in it.

[Stay in Bed Instead]

Breadvan72 said:

I am always rather curious about people who go on to websites and say "Mr Dodgy isn't a paedophile, he's an ephebeophile", and such like things.

I had to google ephebeophile. It appears to be 15 - 19 year olds.

Edited by Stay in Bed Instead on Sunday 17th November 15:01

[anonymous-user]

Stay in Bed Instead said:

I had to google ephenbenophile. It appears to be 15 - 19 year olds.

Fair game then eh?

[Stay in Bed Instead]

yonex said:

Fair game then eh?

Is it unlawful to have consensual sex with 16-19 year olds in the UK

[anonymous-user]

Stay in Bed Instead said:

yonex said:

Fair game then eh?

Is it unlawful to have consensual sex with 16-19 year olds in the UK

Sometimes, yes, for 16 to 18 year olds. Look it up! It is always unlawful to have sex with someone who has been coerced, trafficked, and whatnot. Even if not unlawful, it is super cheesy (more cheesy than a pizza, even) for rich middle aged blokes to boff teenaged women who may be influenced by power and money.

[anonymous-user]

skwdenyer said:

Wacky Racer said:

I just feel sorry for the Queen.

Her offspring are a right shower, but since 1953, she has never put a foot wrong herself, as far as I am aware.

Might one not argue that she’s hardly put a foot right in the child-rearing stakes?

Of course it is an impossible brief she was handed, very young; and I salute her work over the years. Hindsight can be a cruel thing.

She was also a stty sister to her stty sister.

[Stay in Bed Instead]

Breadvan72 said:

Sometimes, yes, for 16 to 18 year olds. Look it up! It is always unlawful to have sex with someone who has been coerced, trafficked, and whatnot. Even if not unlawful, it is super cheesy (more cheesy than a pizza, even) for rich middle aged blokes to boff teenaged women who may be influenced by power and money.

Women have been influence by power and money for centuries. Many go out of their way to look for it.

Mostly footballers these days.

[anonymous-user]

Some women, not all women. Some (not all) young women may not be taking care of their own best interests and may need to be cautioned against hanging out with sleazy old rich dudes.

Some sleazy old rich dudes may need to be cautioned against hanging out with other sleazy old rich dudes who are child rapists.

[anonymous-user]

The Grand Old Duke of York
He had a memory loss
He swears it was a pizza house
And not at Tramps of course
And when he was hot he was hot
Though sweating he was not
And whomever took that photograph
Is likely to be shot.

(copyright: the entire Internet, 2019)

[anonymous-user]

I’m not familiar with all the allegations but you’d think there’s quite the potential for corroboration here. Especially if the FBI are involved and have the capability to track down witnesses, even if international.

BV - side note. I was with an ex-colleague who is now a firearms commander. He was looking through everything to do with Mark Saunders as a case study. Did you represent the IPCC in that case?

[vonuber]

Stay in Bed Instead said:

Why do you feel the need to make it personal?

The Law is the arbiter. Everything else comes under personal morals and attitudes.

At the time of the alleged offence Epstein had not been convicted of anything. We do not know if Andrew had any knowledge of what he was up to.

So getting on the plane 'Lolita express' to a private island decked out in photos of underage girls, which had underage girls there, wasn't a tiny weeny clue what might have been happening?