Consumer debt hit an all-time high last year

Consumer debt hit an all-time high last year

Author
Discussion

mx-6

5,983 posts

213 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
Even though we've hardly had rampant growth it does seem that there has been something of a credit bubble brewing out there.

My humble opinion is that the end of this economic cycle is likely to coincide with brexit, which will pricipitate a downturn, that likely would have happened sooner or later anyhow. Politically I can see brexit and "Tory austerity" being blamed even though the credit cycle and global economic factors will play a large part....

crankedup

25,764 posts

243 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
Ridgemont said:
skahigh said:
crankedup said:
As a 'baby boomer' in my younger days we had no such thing as debt, other than a mortgage perhaps. If you wanted a new tele it was down to Radio Rentals to hire one! Or maybe put down a deposit and take on HP (hire purchase). New cars were few and far between for young people back in the 60s and 70's, most were old bangers held together with fibreglass patches or pudding. No such thing as credit cards or monster loans because you just had to have something NOW,
Better days? Well better than the 40s and 50s.
Eh?
Quite...

Living on Tick
Living on the never never
Hire Purchase

Ignore the source: http://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/socialist-stand...

the key quote is valid:
article said:
Robert Roberts’ The Classic Slum describes life in Salford in the first part of last century. The pawnshop was an essential part of the local community; many people were dependent on the short-term loans offered, with women often pawning the family’s ‘best’ clothes on Monday until the following Saturday. There was a social hierarchy among the working class, with skilled workers at the top, and various ‘disreputable’ individuals at the bottom; and position ‘was judged not only by what one possessed but also by what one pawned’. True destitution meant pawning not just clothes but also pots and rugs, and finally not being able to redeem what had been left with the broker. The interest charged was usually a penny in the shilling per week; sky-high, but less than the moneylender, who charged threepence in the shilling per week.
Debt and loan financing was endemic. It didn't resemble the whizzy world of PAYG loans but was essentially the same dynamic.
Ironically the things that were largely responsible for that world gradually fading away, was the Council House Right to Buy schemes, and the massive explosion in credit cards from the early eighties. The Boomers weren't therefore fiscally more prudent: they were able to tap entirely new lines of credit, and equity that previous generations were unable to.
Problem, the loans taken back in the past were for essentials, like food and rent payments. Slowly but incessantly consumerism rose with the need for 'nice things', luxury items. I also would suggest that 'baby boomers' were brought up to be prudent and save money where possible. Yes I agree that those that purchased a Council house suddenly found that they not only had a mortgage but a useful credit asset they could use alongside those that purchased a house through the private sector.
Now it seems to be OK to have huge debts and a multitude of credit cards, this is obviously driving the debt mountain which is of concern to the BOE. Carney suggesting that a tightening of the loan criteria could be required to rein in consumerism.
Personally I did not hold a credit card until about 1990, but a very useful tool it is to this day.

Have to agree that consumerism has been on the rise since the 1980,s it would be interesting to see how much debt is broken down into respective generations, I suspect that the baby boomers would come out fairly debt free, very broad brush remark, owing to the retirement on good pensions, house equity and kids flown off the nest alongside household furniture / goods now all paid for.

crankedup

25,764 posts

243 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
JagLover said:
BOE "cracks down" on excessive personal debt....which they have caused with their own policies.

Price money properly and you would be far less likely to see such rapid growth in consumer credit.
Trouble is, as we know, if the BOE raised the rate untold people would go bankrupt and lose thier home. Just how many people are living on the edge?

youngsyr

14,742 posts

192 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
sidicks said:
youngsyr said:
Obviously only a problem if your circumstances unexpectedly change within the next 30 months and even then you still have the value of the asset to sell.

But as you're arguing against with a specific scenario, let me counter with another: it's currently more than possible to borrow at 0% to extend your house and then see the value of your house increase above and the value of your debt, so in fact you earn money on your debt.

The fact is, the current economic situation is vastly different to what we've seen before, so applying traditional criticisms to it is not particularly useful.
Borrowing to improve your house which is likely (but not guaranteed) to increase in value over the long term can make sense.

Borrowing to purchase an asset which is likely to depreciate makes much less sense!
Again, that's the traditional viewpoint, but we are in a very different economic situation today; inflation is far above interest rates, which is a new experience and turns the traditional debt/savings relationship on its head.

In this situation it often makes absolute logical sense to take on debt, as effectively you're being paid (in cash terms) to do so.

For example, you want to buy a £10k car to get to work in a neighboring town and have access to a credit card that will lend to you at 0% interest for 2 years. Inflation is at 3%. Savings accounts offer negligible interest.

You can buy the car now on credit for £10k in todays money or you can save up £10k, over 2 years, by which time the car has increased in price (in line with inflation) to £10,609! So waiting two years has actually cost you £609 in cash, plus the opportunity cost of not having the car for two years.

youngsyr

14,742 posts

192 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
crankedup said:
JagLover said:
BOE "cracks down" on excessive personal debt....which they have caused with their own policies.

Price money properly and you would be far less likely to see such rapid growth in consumer credit.
Trouble is, as we know, if the BOE raised the rate untold people would go bankrupt and lose thier home. Just how many people are living on the edge?
I see this assumption bandied about all over the place - as you seem to think it's universally accepted, do you have a source or even a number of just how many people will go under given say a 1% or even 2% increase in interest rates?

superkartracer

8,959 posts

222 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
youngsyr said:
crankedup said:
JagLover said:
BOE "cracks down" on excessive personal debt....which they have caused with their own policies.

Price money properly and you would be far less likely to see such rapid growth in consumer credit.
Trouble is, as we know, if the BOE raised the rate untold people would go bankrupt and lose thier home. Just how many people are living on the edge?
I see this assumption bandied about all over the place - as you seem to think it's universally accepted, do you have a source or even a number of just how many people will go under given say a 1% or even 2% increase in interest rates?
Millions - http://uk.businessinsider.com/theresa-mays-jams-jo...

zarjaz1991

3,480 posts

123 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
BlueHave said:
Can't say i'm at all surprised, plenty of millennials think money grows on trees and are up to their necks in debt.

Car from parents, rent from parents or house from parents so they have never really had to work hard for anything in their life so far.

If they miss a credit card payment it's ok because mummy and daddy will pick up the tab.

Not a great way to live as the safety net won't always be there.
Oh good it's all young people's fault again. Glad we cleared that up.

Jockman

17,917 posts

160 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
zarjaz1991 said:
BlueHave said:
Can't say i'm at all surprised, plenty of millennials think money grows on trees and are up to their necks in debt.

Car from parents, rent from parents or house from parents so they have never really had to work hard for anything in their life so far.

If they miss a credit card payment it's ok because mummy and daddy will pick up the tab.

Not a great way to live as the safety net won't always be there.
Oh good it's all young people's fault again. Glad we cleared that up.
I'm not sure youngsters were the sole object of the critique, but maybe I'm misreading !!

youngsyr

14,742 posts

192 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
superkartracer said:
youngsyr said:
crankedup said:
JagLover said:
BOE "cracks down" on excessive personal debt....which they have caused with their own policies.

Price money properly and you would be far less likely to see such rapid growth in consumer credit.
Trouble is, as we know, if the BOE raised the rate untold people would go bankrupt and lose thier home. Just how many people are living on the edge?
I see this assumption bandied about all over the place - as you seem to think it's universally accepted, do you have a source or even a number of just how many people will go under given say a 1% or even 2% increase in interest rates?
Millions - http://uk.businessinsider.com/theresa-mays-jams-jo...
Nice try - there isn't one mention of the word "interest rate" or "debt" in that entire article.

So, I'll ask again: how many people will go under given say a 1% or even 2% increase in interest rates?

I suspect people's exposure to the BoE base rate is significantly lower than many people believe.

2Btoo

3,426 posts

203 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
BlackLabel said:
Here we are again.
Sorry to get back to the topic of discussion here but unless I (and menousername) is much mistaken that that graph shows the annual increase in debt. So dealership car finance is increasing by about 16% per year. Credit card debt is going up by nearly 10% a year and Total Consumer Credit increasing by more than 10% a year. So if the average family owes £10,000 this year then by next summer it will be £11,000.

I agree that it would be very interesting to see the figure of average household debt for households that have debt. This amount is probably owed by less than half the households in the country (and possibly less than 30%).

superkartracer

8,959 posts

222 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
youngsyr said:
superkartracer said:
youngsyr said:
crankedup said:
JagLover said:
BOE "cracks down" on excessive personal debt....which they have caused with their own policies.

Price money properly and you would be far less likely to see such rapid growth in consumer credit.
Trouble is, as we know, if the BOE raised the rate untold people would go bankrupt and lose thier home. Just how many people are living on the edge?
I see this assumption bandied about all over the place - as you seem to think it's universally accepted, do you have a source or even a number of just how many people will go under given say a 1% or even 2% increase in interest rates?
Millions - http://uk.businessinsider.com/theresa-mays-jams-jo...
Nice try - there isn't one mention of the word "interest rate" or "debt" in that entire article.

So, I'll ask again: how many people will go under given say a 1% or even 2% increase in interest rates?

I suspect people's exposure to the BoE base rate is significantly lower than many people believe.
Gives some insight into debt , don't forget a rise affects businesses and that costs everyone.

youngsyr

14,742 posts

192 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
superkartracer said:
youngsyr said:
superkartracer said:
youngsyr said:
crankedup said:
JagLover said:
BOE "cracks down" on excessive personal debt....which they have caused with their own policies.

Price money properly and you would be far less likely to see such rapid growth in consumer credit.
Trouble is, as we know, if the BOE raised the rate untold people would go bankrupt and lose thier home. Just how many people are living on the edge?
I see this assumption bandied about all over the place - as you seem to think it's universally accepted, do you have a source or even a number of just how many people will go under given say a 1% or even 2% increase in interest rates?
Millions - http://uk.businessinsider.com/theresa-mays-jams-jo...
Nice try - there isn't one mention of the word "interest rate" or "debt" in that entire article.

So, I'll ask again: how many people will go under given say a 1% or even 2% increase in interest rates?

I suspect people's exposure to the BoE base rate is significantly lower than many people believe.
Gives some insight into debt , don't forget a rise affects businesses and that costs everyone.
No doubt, but given how widely it seems to be accepted that an X% rise in interest rate would screw "millions", where is the analysis to back that belief up?

As above, I suspect it is massively overplayed and that's before we even discuss the likelihood of interest rates going up anytime soon.



hyphen

26,262 posts

90 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
youngsyr said:
The youth of today, eh? rolleyes

Tell me: what difference does it make if you buy something now on interest free credit and pay it off over 30 months or you save up over 30 months, earning negligible interest, and buy it at the end of that time - apart from the obvious that you get to use that item 2 and a half years earlier?!
Because being able to pay off the stuff you bought on credit relies on you making a gamble that you will maintain your current income. These companies actually factor in profit they will make from the percentage that will fail to make the payments and so lose the interest free status.

Take todays news 1,200 people cut by Tesco. How many of them will currently have monthly financial commitments that they could have gone without, and are now be panicking about.

These 1200 are in Head office jobs, so will have iPhones, leased cars, credit card debts. And a dfs interest free sofa.

Just a week before 1,100 people in Cardiff were also sacked by Tesco - total since 2014 is 7000+ people. There is no guaranteed job security.

Edited by hyphen on Wednesday 28th June 14:52

superkartracer

8,959 posts

222 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
Just from looking around and seeing all the swank cars and tat people purchase and the insane house prices to boot and people generally have little savings these days , one wonders where the ££ is actually coming from .

youngsyr

14,742 posts

192 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
hyphen said:
Because being able to pay off the stuff you bought on credit relies on you making a gamble that you will maintain your current income. These companies actually factor in profit they will make from the percentage that will fail to make the payments and so lose the interest free status.

Take todays news 1,200 people cut by Tesco. How many of them will currently have monthly financial commitments that they could have gone without, and are now be panicking about.

These 1200 are in Head office jobs, so will have iPhones, leased cars, credit card debts. And a dfs interest free sofa.
Are you arguing that all 1200 of those people will now be bankrupted from their debt?

If not, what is your point?

hyphen

26,262 posts

90 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
What I am saying is, many people don't see further than the end of their nose. Taking on debt for todays happiness can be tomorrows nightmares.

Over 10,000 committed suicide during the crash of 2008-2010, job losses and debt being primary reason.

Many of the current people are not intelligent consumers making a decision, it is the low iq, low educated plebs who are being sold a dream and falling for it.

BoRED S2upid

19,702 posts

240 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
hyphen said:
What I am saying is, many people don't see further than the end of their nose. Taking on debt for todays happiness can be tomorrows nightmares.

Over 10,000 committed suicide during the crash of 2008-2010, job losses and debt being primary reason.

Many of the current people are not intelligent consumers making a decision, it is the low iq, low educated plebs who are being sold a dream and falling for it.
This isn't going to change while money is cheap it's only going to get worse. The only way to slow it down is to slowly increase interest rates.

crankedup

25,764 posts

243 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
youngsyr said:
crankedup said:
JagLover said:
BOE "cracks down" on excessive personal debt....which they have caused with their own policies.

Price money properly and you would be far less likely to see such rapid growth in consumer credit.
Trouble is, as we know, if the BOE raised the rate untold people would go bankrupt and lose thier home. Just how many people are living on the edge?
I see this assumption bandied about all over the place - as you seem to think it's universally accepted, do you have a source or even a number of just how many people will go under given say a 1% or even 2% increase in interest rates?
Very good question, nobody can offer a number but the higher the interest rate rises the harder it will be for indebted persons to make payments on time. I can only answer by saying if the BOE is raising the issue of personal debt becoming worrisome for them to be concerned about payback issues, then I think it's fair to assume it's a genuine problem. How many people would go bust I do not have the answer to that, however, having seen the effect of negative equity during the 90,s upon people losing thier homes I hope it can be averted this time. The BOE are responsible for control of the interest rate that holds the key to affordability, best to assume on the safe side imo, and not overload on debt.

Jockman

17,917 posts

160 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
BoRED S2upid said:
This isn't going to change while money is cheap it's only going to get worse. The only way to slow it down is to slowly increase interest rates.
This would cure issues whilst simultaneously causing other problems. You are right to use the word slowly.

crankedup

25,764 posts

243 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
youngsyr said:
superkartracer said:
youngsyr said:
superkartracer said:
youngsyr said:
crankedup said:
JagLover said:
BOE "cracks down" on excessive personal debt....which they have caused with their own policies.

Price money properly and you would be far less likely to see such rapid growth in consumer credit.
Trouble is, as we know, if the BOE raised the rate untold people would go bankrupt and lose thier home. Just how many people are living on the edge?
I see this assumption bandied about all over the place - as you seem to think it's universally accepted, do you have a source or even a number of just how many people will go under given say a 1% or even 2% increase in interest rates?
Millions - http://uk.businessinsider.com/theresa-mays-jams-jo...
Nice try - there isn't one mention of the word "interest rate" or "debt" in that entire article.

So, I'll ask again: how many people will go under given say a 1% or even 2% increase in interest rates?

I suspect people's exposure to the BoE base rate is significantly lower than many people believe.
Gives some insight into debt , don't forget a rise affects businesses and that costs everyone.
No doubt, but given how widely it seems to be accepted that an X% rise in interest rate would screw "millions", where is the analysis to back that belief up?

As above, I suspect it is massively overplayed and that's before we even discuss the likelihood of interest rates going up anytime soon.
With the debt taken on at such a low level of interest rate applied it will only take small increments of % increase to have an effect upon the debt repayment sum.