The 'No to the EU' campaign
Discussion
///ajd said:
Is this the same Timmermans?
Mr Timmermans today told Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan his country was "moving further away" from Europe on human rights in a warning over future EU membership.
Possibly, he's a eurodrone after all; occupying two positions at the same time is in the job description.Mr Timmermans today told Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan his country was "moving further away" from Europe on human rights in a warning over future EU membership.
turbobloke said:
One for Zod...
A major leak from Brussels has revealed the NHS will be killed off if Britain remains in the European Union
Tucked away, the article admits......."EU officials claim they will have wording that allows for the NHS to be protected"A major leak from Brussels has revealed the NHS will be killed off if Britain remains in the European Union
///ajd said:
turbobloke said:
Tucked away, the article admits......."EU officials claim they will have wording that allows for the NHS to be protected"///ajd said:
turbobloke said:
Tucked away, the article admits......."EU officials claim they will have wording that allows for the NHS to be protected"Superb truncation, it would do a politician proud.
"EU officials claim they will have wording that allows for the NHS to be protected but have so far failed to provide a full exemption."
There are weasel words, and then there are the words in my bold.
///ajd said:
turbobloke said:
Tucked away, the article admits......."EU officials claim they will have wording that allows for the NHS to be protected""EU officials claim they will have wording that allows for the NHS to be protected but have so far failed to provide a full exemption".
Note the word 'claim' and the part you accidentally (whoops!) clipped off "but have so far failed to provide a full exemption".
Edit: TB beat me to it
turbobloke said:
One for Zod...
A major leak from Brussels has revealed the NHS will be killed off if Britain remains in the European Union
More project fear from the leave campaign... A major leak from Brussels has revealed the NHS will be killed off if Britain remains in the European Union
EddieSteadyGo said:
turbobloke said:
More project fear from the leave campaign... Examples like this remind me of my 8yo learning to argue a point.
I sometimes have to remind him that his audience aren't idiots, and therefore not to demean himself by treating them like idiots.
Is there any justifiable reason for such blatant clipping of a sentence to twist it's meaning?
I sometimes have to remind him that his audience aren't idiots, and therefore not to demean himself by treating them like idiots.
Is there any justifiable reason for such blatant clipping of a sentence to twist it's meaning?
EddieSteadyGo said:
turbobloke said:
More project fear from the leave campaign... ///ajd said:
turbobloke said:
Tucked away, the article admits......."EU officials claim they will have wording that allows for the NHS to be protected"don'tbesilly said:
///ajd said:
turbobloke said:
Tucked away, the article admits......."EU officials claim they will have wording that allows for the NHS to be protected""EU officials claim they will have wording that allows for the NHS to be protected but have so far failed to provide a full exemption".
Note the word 'claim' and the part you accidentally (whoops!) clipped off "but have so far failed to provide a full exemption".
Edit: TB beat me to it
Rather than pick on my editing - see through the huge amounts of initial spin in the article.
Example: "The UK Government has promised it will count all the votes in the EU referendum, but have so far failed to provide a full explanation of how they will do so." See? Meaningless piffle.
See here:
NHS Confederation
http://www.nhsconfed.org/regions-and-eu/nhs-europe...
Some easily found facts not express drivel said:
EU/US trade pact proposal seems to protect NHS
The latest text of the EU's negotiating proposal to the US, made public on 31 July, contains strong safeguards which enable Member States to retain full control over how they provide health services.
The text on services, investment and commerce contains the same safeguards for health services as in CETA, the trade agreement between the EU and Canada. In particular, it safeguards the right of EU Member States to adopt or maintain any measure with regard to:
- the provision of all health services which receive public funding or state support in any form
- medical and dental services and services provided by midwives, nurses, physiotherapists and paramedics
- privately funded health services other than privately funded hospital, ambulance and residential non-hospital health services (eg nursing homes)
- establishing suppliers and restricting the cross-border provision of privately funded hospital, ambulance and residential non-hospital health services (eg nursing homes)
- research and development which receives public funding or state support in any form.
Implying I have the debating skills of an 8 year in this context is a bit silly.The latest text of the EU's negotiating proposal to the US, made public on 31 July, contains strong safeguards which enable Member States to retain full control over how they provide health services.
The text on services, investment and commerce contains the same safeguards for health services as in CETA, the trade agreement between the EU and Canada. In particular, it safeguards the right of EU Member States to adopt or maintain any measure with regard to:
- the provision of all health services which receive public funding or state support in any form
- medical and dental services and services provided by midwives, nurses, physiotherapists and paramedics
- privately funded health services other than privately funded hospital, ambulance and residential non-hospital health services (eg nursing homes)
- establishing suppliers and restricting the cross-border provision of privately funded hospital, ambulance and residential non-hospital health services (eg nursing homes)
- research and development which receives public funding or state support in any form.
Edited by ///ajd on Thursday 5th May 20:49
///ajd said:
turbobloke said:
Tucked away, the article admits......."EU officials claim they will have wording that allows for the NHS to be protected"mondeoman said:
///ajd said:
turbobloke said:
Tucked away, the article admits......."EU officials claim they will have wording that allows for the NHS to be protected"http://www.nhsconfed.org/media-centre/2014/11/nhs-...
In short - the threats are within the UK Governments power to fully mitigate.
"Nothing in TTIP will stop the four UK countries deciding, through their democratically elected governments, how to run their own health systems. But the UK can press for certain kinds of services, such as publicly funded health services, to be protected from the scope of the trade pact."
All still subject to finalisation of course, but the intent appears clear.
turbobloke said:
///ajd said:
turbobloke said:
Tucked away, the article admits......."EU officials claim they will have wording that allows for the NHS to be protected"Superb truncation, it would do a politician proud.
"EU officials claim they will have wording that allows for the NHS to be protected but have so far failed to provide a full exemption."
There are weasel words, and then there are the words in my bold.
Einion Yrth said:
Either way up this entire thread appears to be some bizarre form of mental masturbation, no one is changing anyone's mind on the subject because there quite simply isn't anything substantive being offered. The mud slinging from both sides, while a vaguely entertaining spectator sport, is ultimately, pointless.
+1EddieSteadyGo said:
turbobloke said:
More project fear from the leave campaign... ///ajd said:
don'tbesilly said:
///ajd said:
turbobloke said:
Tucked away, the article admits......."EU officials claim they will have wording that allows for the NHS to be protected""EU officials claim they will have wording that allows for the NHS to be protected but have so far failed to provide a full exemption".
Note the word 'claim' and the part you accidentally (whoops!) clipped off "but have so far failed to provide a full exemption".
Edit: TB beat me to it
Rather than pick on my editing - see through the huge amounts of initial spin in the article.
Example: "The UK Government has promised it will count all the votes in the EU referendum, but have so far failed to provide a full explanation of how they will do so." See? Meaningless piffle.
See here:
NHS Confederation
http://www.nhsconfed.org/regions-and-eu/nhs-europe...
Some easily found facts not express drivel said:
EU/US trade pact proposal seems to protect NHS
The latest text of the EU's negotiating proposal to the US, made public on 31 July, contains strong safeguards which enable Member States to retain full control over how they provide health services.
The text on services, investment and commerce contains the same safeguards for health services as in CETA, the trade agreement between the EU and Canada. In particular, it safeguards the right of EU Member States to adopt or maintain any measure with regard to:
- the provision of all health services which receive public funding or state support in any form
- medical and dental services and services provided by midwives, nurses, physiotherapists and paramedics
- privately funded health services other than privately funded hospital, ambulance and residential non-hospital health services (eg nursing homes)
- establishing suppliers and restricting the cross-border provision of privately funded hospital, ambulance and residential non-hospital health services (eg nursing homes)
- research and development which receives public funding or state support in any form.
Implying I have the debating skills of an 8 year in this context is a bit silly.The latest text of the EU's negotiating proposal to the US, made public on 31 July, contains strong safeguards which enable Member States to retain full control over how they provide health services.
The text on services, investment and commerce contains the same safeguards for health services as in CETA, the trade agreement between the EU and Canada. In particular, it safeguards the right of EU Member States to adopt or maintain any measure with regard to:
- the provision of all health services which receive public funding or state support in any form
- medical and dental services and services provided by midwives, nurses, physiotherapists and paramedics
- privately funded health services other than privately funded hospital, ambulance and residential non-hospital health services (eg nursing homes)
- establishing suppliers and restricting the cross-border provision of privately funded hospital, ambulance and residential non-hospital health services (eg nursing homes)
- research and development which receives public funding or state support in any form.
An 8 year ('old' - see above) would have far better debating skills!
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff