Will overuled by judge
Discussion
Ali G said:
mondeoman said:
I can't understand why people don't understand that what's mine is none of theirs, or anyone else's, business. It's mine, and if I want to leave it to the royal lets fk off to Jupiter society and not my kids, then that's the way it's going to be.
As for inheritance tax, ps off, you had your cut, what's left is mine to do with as I please - see above.
Single then? As for inheritance tax, ps off, you had your cut, what's left is mine to do with as I please - see above.
No offspring?
I understand - it's all yours!
jimmybobby said:
sugerbear said:
As a taxpayer it's the right decision.
A nice chunk of benefits will be removed, the housing association gets some capital to re-invest in another house (I hope).
quote from the judgement - "the appellant received tax credits and benefits of £13,204 per year consisting of £8,112 tax credit, plus £5,092 housing and council tax benefit"
Taxpayer 1 - 0 Spiteful Mother
You assume she will come off benefits I bet she doesnt. She has spent most of her lief on benefits from how I read it which is part of the reason here mother disowned her as she felt her husband was a waste of space who had no desire to work or earn what he has.A nice chunk of benefits will be removed, the housing association gets some capital to re-invest in another house (I hope).
quote from the judgement - "the appellant received tax credits and benefits of £13,204 per year consisting of £8,112 tax credit, plus £5,092 housing and council tax benefit"
Taxpayer 1 - 0 Spiteful Mother
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff