Joyless feminism
Discussion
Point is, I think she has dressed in a somewhat flaunting fashion. Which exposes her boobs, legs, curves. And then she moans about it people are complementing her.
You can wear what you like but if you wore nothing but one of those woooly hats you get on bottles of Innocent Smoothies covering your bell end you would certainly expect some comments.
You can wear what you like but if you wore nothing but one of those woooly hats you get on bottles of Innocent Smoothies covering your bell end you would certainly expect some comments.
xjay1337 said:
Point is, I think she has dressed in a somewhat flaunting fashion. Which exposes her boobs, legs, curves. And then she moans about it people are complementing her.
Do you seriously believe that?I'm no feminist but there's a world of difference between looking and thinking "Nice tits" to yourself vs. going on LinkedIn (which has its faults but is supposed to be a business/professional network) and writing it.
If nothing else you'd have to be a giant idiot given it's probably the first place any potential employer will look for info on you these days.
bhstewie said:
Do you seriously believe that?
I'm no feminist but there's a world of difference between looking and thinking "Nice tits" to yourself vs. going on LinkedIn (which has its faults but is supposed to be a business/professional network) and writing it.
If nothing else you'd have to be a giant idiot given it's probably the first place any potential employer will look for info on you these days.
Exactly.I'm no feminist but there's a world of difference between looking and thinking "Nice tits" to yourself vs. going on LinkedIn (which has its faults but is supposed to be a business/professional network) and writing it.
If nothing else you'd have to be a giant idiot given it's probably the first place any potential employer will look for info on you these days.
mondeoman said:
EYE wouldn't - you can guarantee that under all that muck there's a very average face with a wk personality.
I don't need to see it minus the muck (it's troweled on), she is average looking at best anyway and is blatantly flaunting her 'assets' to distract from that fact.It's a crazy world we live in nowadays and the simplest of things seem to offend people and it's then blasted all across social media as a 'look at me' statement.
rxtx said:
anonymous said:
[redacted]
She hasn't done that herself though, that's a standard Mail Online watermark.I only know because they published one of my photos once and they did the same.
Mr Snrub said:
But not so offended about people seeing her photos that she sells her story to one of the most visited news websites around
I'm not bothered either way, but I had no idea a photo I'd entered into a completely unrelated competition was going to be published there so I've no doubt she had no idea either, "news" is circulated.I did a reverse image search on my photo and the same article was on websites all over the world and translated into Japanese, Chinese, Thai ...
rxtx said:
Mr Snrub said:
But not so offended about people seeing her photos that she sells her story to one of the most visited news websites around
I'm not bothered either way, but I had no idea a photo I'd entered into a completely unrelated competition was going to be published there so I've no doubt she had no idea either, "news" is circulated.I did a reverse image search on my photo and the same article was on websites all over the world and translated into Japanese, Chinese, Thai ...
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff