Brexit

Author
Discussion

AJS-

15,366 posts

236 months

Tuesday 1st December 2015
quotequote all
ATG said:
He's accountable to Parliament. How much more democratic do you want?
I want our laws to be drafted, debated and voted upon by our elected representatives in parliament. Not traded for a whole load of other things in some CoM meeting.

irocfan

40,487 posts

190 months

Tuesday 1st December 2015
quotequote all
ATG said:
The idea that the future really is ever closer union is rather at odds with the wishes of almost every member state's population. Do you think the French want to be less French, for example?
You think that the populous really has any real say in the vanity project? IIRC at least one country voted not to ratify a treaty and were told to vote again until they got the right answer... deomcracy laugh what a quaint notion rofl

Bluebarge

4,519 posts

178 months

Tuesday 1st December 2015
quotequote all
Rovinghawk said:
How about those who hand down EU orders being accountable to someone?
Well "EU Orders" kind of indicates that your mind is closed to rational explanation on this point since it is filled with images of Brussels Gauleiters but if you are referring to the Commission, the Commissioners are nominated by individual member states, chosen by the constituent EU member states and their appointments are reviewed by the EU Parliament. They do not hand down "orders" they propose legislation which is reviewed and voted on by EU member governments and the EU Parliament.

The Commission is a civil service for Europe, in effect.

You could have a more directly democratic system but then you don't want it. You just want out.

Bluebarge

4,519 posts

178 months

Tuesday 1st December 2015
quotequote all
don4l said:
Stop making stuff up. You must think that we are a bunch of ignorant thickos if you think that we are going to swallow this drivel.

Look up the WTO, and what is has achieved over the past 20 years.

The world is slowly, but surely, becoming a free trade area - a bit like the one we thought we were joining in 1973.
But it doesn't compensate for being part of the Single Market, or having the greater negotiating power of the EU. And if you want access to that, you either pay tariffs or sign up to 90% of EU legislation by joining the EEA.

Bluebarge

4,519 posts

178 months

Tuesday 1st December 2015
quotequote all
Alex said:
If I disagree with an EU directive, whom do I vote out? However I vote in the national election or the EU election, nothing will change.

There's your democratic deficit.
If you are a Labour supporter, and you vote in a Conservative constituency, you may as well stay in bed on polling day - ditto if you're a Tory in Glasgow. That's a thumping deficit in our own system but the Eurosceptics don't seem to want to address that one. Which is why I doubt that this "commitment to democracy" has anything to do with the arguments for Brexit.

CaptainSlow

13,179 posts

212 months

Tuesday 1st December 2015
quotequote all
Bluebarge said:
If you are a Labour supporter, and you vote in a Conservative constituency, you may as well stay in bed on polling day - ditto if you're a Tory in Glasgow. That's a thumping deficit in our own system but the Eurosceptics don't seem to want to address that one. Which is why I doubt that this "commitment to democracy" has anything to do with the arguments for Brexit.
Excellent, deflect the question. I don't believe the discussion was about whether we are happy with the current UK Parliamentary electoral process.

Bluebarge

4,519 posts

178 months

Tuesday 1st December 2015
quotequote all
CaptainSlow said:
Bluebarge said:
If you are a Labour supporter, and you vote in a Conservative constituency, you may as well stay in bed on polling day - ditto if you're a Tory in Glasgow. That's a thumping deficit in our own system but the Eurosceptics don't seem to want to address that one. Which is why I doubt that this "commitment to democracy" has anything to do with the arguments for Brexit.
Excellent, deflect the question. I don't believe the discussion was about whether we are happy with the current UK Parliamentary electoral process.
Not deflection at all. Merely pointing out that those who think a perceived lack of democracy is a reason for leaving the EU show absolutely no interest in the undemocratic nature of our own arrangements; which suggest that their commitment to democracy is shallow and their arguments conceal a different reason for leaving.

Besides, the idea that sovereign states always get their own way is nonsense. In or out of the EU our Govt. would have to make messy compromises which some electors would be unhappy with. That's just life. Ever since this country has existed it has been in and out of alliances and forced to compromise. The idea that we could achieve complete independence is a pipe-dream.

AJS-

15,366 posts

236 months

Tuesday 1st December 2015
quotequote all
The Commission simply is not a civil service for Europe. It's the executive branch of the government of the country called the European Union. The country we were never asked if we wanted to be a part of.

ATG

20,578 posts

272 months

Tuesday 1st December 2015
quotequote all
irocfan said:
ATG said:
The idea that the future really is ever closer union is rather at odds with the wishes of almost every member state's population. Do you think the French want to be less French, for example?
You think that the populous really has any real say in the vanity project? IIRC at least one country voted not to ratify a treaty and were told to vote again until they got the right answer... deomcracy laugh what a quaint notion rofl
rofl you're right. We live in a dictatorship. Oh hang on, no we don't.

Scuffers

20,887 posts

274 months

Tuesday 1st December 2015
quotequote all
AJS- said:
The Commission simply is not a civil service for Europe. It's the executive branch of the government of the country called the European Union. The country we were never asked if we wanted to be a part of.
quite right.

Anybody that think this is the case needs to go back and check again.

The EU commission is nothing like the civil service, they define policy, direction, put up legislation, etc etc, they are the executive in the same way our cabinet is the executive of the UK, the difference being we vote for the party/cabinet/MP's, the commissioners are appointed.


Bluebarge

4,519 posts

178 months

Tuesday 1st December 2015
quotequote all
I see someone had a good lunch.

Right, the arguments have all been aired and the OP (if his mind was ever open) can now make it up.

I'm off. Play nicely.

Esseesse

8,969 posts

208 months

Tuesday 1st December 2015
quotequote all
CaptainSlow said:
Esseesse said:
Our continued membership will depend on the continuing assent of Parliament. Just because there is a 'stay' vote on one day doesn't mean the British electorate cannot then vote for a party who pledges to withdraw from the EU afterwards.

Edited by Esseesse on Tuesday 1st December 12:52
Sadly this isn't the way it works. The UK voted for a party that promised a referendum in 2010 but didn't get one due to horse trading an election pledge the Tory leadership didn't really want tohonour to the Lib Dems. Likewise ~4 million people voted for this single issue in last year's GE and got 1 seat. UK politics is structured to favour the status quo, being able to vote to leave in the future will be almost impossible.
The share of the vote of the main two parties has been on the slide for a long long time, do you see that trend reversing?

IMO it is the way it works, it's just that not enough have voted for a party that pledges to leave, yet. If such a party never achieves a majority because the electorate don't care then so be it.

don4l

10,058 posts

176 months

Tuesday 1st December 2015
quotequote all
Bluebarge said:
don4l said:
Stop making stuff up. You must think that we are a bunch of ignorant thickos if you think that we are going to swallow this drivel.

Look up the WTO, and what is has achieved over the past 20 years.

The world is slowly, but surely, becoming a free trade area - a bit like the one we thought we were joining in 1973.
But it doesn't compensate for being part of the Single Market, or having the greater negotiating power of the EU. And if you want access to that, you either pay tariffs or sign up to 90% of EU legislation by joining the EEA.
Yes, it does compensate for being partof the single market. From 1999 to 2014, UK exports destined for the EU fell from 54.8 per cent to 44.6 per cent of total exports. The figure is still dropping. European economies are stagnating while the rest of the world is growing.

I don't want access to the negotiating power of the EU. I want Britain to negotiate the best deals for Britain. The current system all to often acts against our interests. The UK has been outvoted in Brussels more than any other member state. Do some research instead of just making stuff up.

Equally, why would I worry about tariffs? You do realise that we run a trade deficit with Europe? We have a surplus with the rest of the globe.

We are far more important to Europe than Europe is to the UK.

Scuffers

20,887 posts

274 months

Tuesday 1st December 2015
quotequote all
don4l said:
We are far more important to Europe than Europe is to the UK.
why is it that the Pro-EU'ers simply cannot see this?

beyond numbers, politics, etc. this is the stand out point that we need to start from.


ATG

20,578 posts

272 months

Tuesday 1st December 2015
quotequote all
AJS- said:
ATG said:
He's accountable to Parliament. How much more democratic do you want?
I want our laws to be drafted, debated and voted upon by our elected representatives in parliament. Not traded for a whole load of other things in some CoM meeting.
Every time we negotiate any deal between states we horse trade, compromise and are them bound by the agreement. That's how trade deals work, that's how UN deals are done, that's how things like the international criminal court get established. It's completely normal. How else can you conceive agreements between states being reached?

The EU is at heart a group of independent states that have agreed to abide by a set of treaties and which continues to make big decisions as a group of independent states.

Unless you think we should never be bound by any international treaty, I can't see why you'd single out EU treaties as a problem in principle. Unless of course you were just casting around for an argument to try to justify an instinctive dislike of the EU.

ATG

20,578 posts

272 months

Tuesday 1st December 2015
quotequote all
Scuffers said:
don4l said:
We are far more important to Europe than Europe is to the UK.
why is it that the Pro-EU'ers simply cannot see this?

beyond numbers, politics, etc. this is the stand out point that we need to start from.

Could it be because it's complete bks?

Scuffers

20,887 posts

274 months

Tuesday 1st December 2015
quotequote all
ATG said:
Could it be because it's complete bks?
so, tell me why it's bks as you put it?

we are the second biggest economy in the EU (only just behind Germany), we are THE financial centre for the whole of not just Europe, we are the second biggest contributor to the EU budget and we are a massive consumer nation to the rest of the EU.

if/when we pull out, just how much of a financial hit are Germany/France/etc going to be able to stand?



Alex

9,975 posts

284 months

Tuesday 1st December 2015
quotequote all
Bluebarge said:
If you are a Labour supporter, and you vote in a Conservative constituency, you may as well stay in bed on polling day - ditto if you're a Tory in Glasgow. That's a thumping deficit in our own system but the Eurosceptics don't seem to want to address that one. Which is why I doubt that this "commitment to democracy" has anything to do with the arguments for Brexit.
Not necessarily true. Labour are about to lose the safe seat of Oldham to UKIP.

Rovinghawk

Original Poster:

13,300 posts

158 months

Tuesday 1st December 2015
quotequote all
Bluebarge said:
if you are referring to the Commission, the Commissioners are nominated by individual member states, chosen by the constituent EU member states and their appointments are reviewed by the EU Parliament. They do not hand down "orders" they propose legislation which is reviewed and voted on by EU member governments and the EU Parliament.
To whom are they accountable?

Edited by Rovinghawk on Tuesday 1st December 14:54

Bluebarge

4,519 posts

178 months

Tuesday 1st December 2015
quotequote all
Scuffers said:
ATG said:
Could it be because it's complete bks?
so, tell me why it's bks as you put it?

we are the second biggest economy in the EU (only just behind Germany), we are THE financial centre for the whole of not just Europe, we are the second biggest contributor to the EU budget and we are a massive consumer nation to the rest of the EU.

if/when we pull out, just how much of a financial hit are Germany/France/etc going to be able to stand?
Damn. Couldn't resist.

It's bks for the reasons stated above - only 10% of the rest of the EU's trade is with us, plus if you want to join the EEA you have to PAY for the privilege in hard cash - we are not likely to end up contributing much less in the EEA than in the EU.

Plus the City could decamp to the Eurozone tomorrow and, as other posters have pointed out, probably would. You can't have an international market-place without free movement of people and capital, and Frankfurt has been eyeing the City's position for years - this would be its chance.

As to state's contributions to the EU Budget, they are pretty small beer in the scheme of things and the hit would have to be shared out - they'd manage fine, particularly once they've trousered our EEA joining fee and annual subscription.

Anyway, really am gone now. Carry on wibbling smile