Is Britain Full?

Author
Discussion

Jockman

17,917 posts

160 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
rscott said:
According to the BBC report, population of Aberdeen fell, so there's presumably some space there already...
Lol. Pesky oil industry and its turbulence !!!

Mr GrimNasty

8,172 posts

170 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Jockman said:
rscott said:
According to the BBC report, population of Aberdeen fell, so there's presumably some space there already...
Lol. Pesky oil industry and its turbulence !!!
Sooner or later the Scots will get a leader who realises that the future prosperity of Scotland lies in going all out for onshore fracking and not in windmills.

Trouble is if they miss the boat, and other countries get going first, England for instance, the window of opportunity will be lost.

It's certainly Scotland's only chance of ever being Independent.

But at the moment parading your climate change (aka global socialism) credentials is more important to some.

Moonhawk

10,730 posts

219 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
NEEP said:
Why Scotland?

is there a massive shortage of housing in Scotland, are Scottish Industries struggling to house their workforce and therefore unable to expand?
Why not?

There might not be a shortage, but given the high population density in England and especially the south east - should we be taking a wider view and look to actively expand or move businesses and industry into more sparsely populated areas of the UK (like the far north of England, Scotland and Wales).

crankedup

25,764 posts

243 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Moonhawk said:
NEEP said:
Why Scotland?

is there a massive shortage of housing in Scotland, are Scottish Industries struggling to house their workforce and therefore unable to expand?
Why not?

There might not be a shortage, but given the high population density in England and especially the south east - should we be taking a wider view and look to actively expand or move businesses and industry into more sparsely populated areas of the UK (like the far north of England, Scotland and Wales).
Somebody, can't recall his name winkhad a bright idea and named it The Northern Powerhouse.

768

13,682 posts

96 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Give it a few more years and all those extra EU citizens might be able to sway the second referendum vote. wink

Pan Pan Pan

9,917 posts

111 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
It is not a matter of space, since it has been said that the entire population of the world could fit onto the Isle of Wight, it just wouldn't be very nice there, if that is what actually happened.
It is a matter of numbers relative to available resources, of which space would be just one element.
I grow tired of people whining, about overcrowded schools, roads jammed with traffic, an overstrained NHS. queues for GP appointments, lack of affordable housing, and yet go quiet when it is pointed out to them, that the population of the UK is rising at a rate never before seen in the UK
It is true that some of this is owing to people living longer, but in most cases those doing so, will have worked and contributed to the countries coffers over their lifetime, so they have earned their right to be here. How long do people believe it is possible to ram, an EU quart into a UK pint pot, let alone similar numbers also trying to get into the UK from outside the EU?
Looks like we might be headed for the Soylent Green scenario, (not just in this country) faster than many people think.
And for those who think that unlimited immigration into the UK is not a problem, put `your' money where `your' mouth is and please supply your name and address, so that the next 50 immigrants coming to the UK can be directed to your house to live with you, and at your expense, or do you expect others to foot the bill for your hopelessly naïve point of view?. Apparently Silly Lilly Allen, has taken in absolutely thousands of Calais immigrants to her expensive West London home on this basis...Oh wait!

Mrr T

12,237 posts

265 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Moonhawk said:
...given the high population density in England and especially the south east...
The high population density in the south east is distorted by London. I live in the south east on the edge of a commuter town. From my back windows all I see is fields. Going east the next large town is 20 miles away with just fields and some small towns and villages in-between.

B'stard Child

28,417 posts

246 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Mrr T said:
Moonhawk said:
...given the high population density in England and especially the south east...
The high population density in the south east is distorted by London. I live in the south east on the edge of a commuter town. From my back windows all I see is fields. Going east the next large town is 20 miles away with just fields and some small towns and villages in-between.
We know everything in your world is rosy

Problem is not everyone is in your world

Pan Pan Pan

9,917 posts

111 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
If we are going to refer to space, 980 thousand UK nationals have moved into continental Europe in the last 10 years, whereas 3.5 million EU nationals (to say nothing of the similar numbers trying to get into the UK from the rest of the world) have crammed themselves into the UK in the last 10 years.
We therefore have a situation where just 980 thousand UK nationals have spread themselves into the 3.39 MILLION square miles of the EU countries, whilst in the same time 3.5 million EU nationals have spread themselves into the 98 THOUSAND square miles of the relatively tiny UK. Doesn't seem to compute does it? Or if it does, how long can this lop sided situation continue?

wiggy001

6,545 posts

271 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Mrr T said:
The high population density in the south east is distorted by London. I live in the south east on the edge of a commuter town. From my back windows all I see is fields. Going east the next large town is 20 miles away with just fields and some small towns and villages in-between.
Would you be happy if those fields were built on to create a new "garden village", merging your town with the next?

paua

5,735 posts

143 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
REALIST123 said:
Orchid1 said:
To be fair though;

Population of Canada - 36 million

Population of Australia - 24 million

Population of UK - 65 million

ie we have more people on this island than Canada and Australia combined.
Might as well throw NZ in there too........
On the face of it, your point is probably valid (in terms of people/square km), however NZ - & indeed the whole world is facing (to a greater or lesser degree) a similar problem. There are - quite simply - too many people in the world & it won't get better any time soon.
Here, in NZ, we have our own issues - on a smaller scale - but no less valid.
In 30 - 50 years time, the pressure will be much higher, everywhere - politics, religion,social issues generally, food production, waste management, energy needs...
The issues highlighted in this( & other ) thread(s) are not specific to any one country.

Glasgowrob

3,245 posts

121 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Country is nowhere near full,

we just need to spread people out more,


have a big push on remote working, get businesses to relocate out of London to other towns and cities.



B'stard Child

28,417 posts

246 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Glasgowrob said:
Country is nowhere near full,

we just need to spread people out more,


have a big push on remote working, get businesses to relocate out of London to other towns and cities.
The government could do more - how many elements of government are based in London when there is no reason to be based there - could save a fortune spreading operations out around the UK

Hayek

8,969 posts

208 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Country was full at 60M. We should be aiming for 55M.

Mrr T

12,237 posts

265 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Hayek said:
Country was full at 60M. We should be aiming for 55M.
How?

JagLover

42,418 posts

235 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
wiggy001 said:
Would you be happy if those fields were built on to create a new "garden village", merging your town with the next?
Also a common feature of new developments round our way is that developments are built (often with hundreds of new houses in a single development) and there is no increase in road capacity at all.

The country needs a definite focus on quality of life and part of that quality of life is being able to leave you house later than 7.15 in the morning without facing gridlock on the roads.

wiggy001

6,545 posts

271 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
JagLover said:
wiggy001 said:
Would you be happy if those fields were built on to create a new "garden village", merging your town with the next?
Also a common feature of new developments round our way is that developments are built (often with hundreds of new houses in a single development) and there is no increase in road capacity at all.

The country needs a definite focus on quality of life and part of that quality of life is being able to leave you house later than 7.15 in the morning without facing gridlock on the roads.
As you can tell, mine was a loaded question... plans for a "garden village" near me have been put on hold for now. The initial consultation was a survey asking us if we wanted better leisure facilities, better transport etc etc. Of course most people said yes. It was then announced that a developer would fund this if they were allowed to build on local farmland and greenbelt, merging 2 villages with the nearest town and doubling the local population.

I fear this proposal won't go away because Seveoaks council have a quota to meet. mad

Jockman

17,917 posts

160 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Mr GrimNasty said:
Jockman said:
rscott said:
According to the BBC report, population of Aberdeen fell, so there's presumably some space there already...
Lol. Pesky oil industry and its turbulence !!!
Sooner or later the Scots will get a leader who realises that the future prosperity of Scotland lies in going all out for onshore fracking and not in windmills.

Trouble is if they miss the boat, and other countries get going first, England for instance, the window of opportunity will be lost.

It's certainly Scotland's only chance of ever being Independent.

But at the moment parading your climate change (aka global socialism) credentials is more important to some.
You can see why Wee Kranky is desperate to play up the Sewel Convention on Fishing rights.

Troubleatmill

10,210 posts

159 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Why do we need more people here exactly?
Plenty of space in the really big countries that could be filled up first.

crankedup

25,764 posts

243 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Troubleatmill said:
Why do we need more people here exactly?
Plenty of space in the really big countries that could be filled up first.
Yup, plenty of room in the Australian outback, but hey have been sensible over the decades past. Having said that I don' t think the aboriginal people have been very pleased to see immigration levels rise of he decades! Not that they are racist or anything like it?