Jacob Rees-Mogg

Author
Discussion

jonby

5,357 posts

158 months

Friday 26th July 2019
quotequote all
Dr Jekyll said:
markh1973 said:
jonby said:
Thankfully for you, JRM won't judge you based on your background the way you have judged him because of his
Not unless you went to state school that is.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/sta...
The article accuses him of saying that people who went to state schools are potted plants, then gives the full quote which shows he said nothing of the sort.
He was simply saying that he wanted intellectually able people, and if that meant a high proportion of those selected had been to Oxford or Cambridge so be it. Rather than take on people with other educational backgrounds simply for the sake of diversity but who might as well be potted plants.
Don't let facts get in the way of a good soundbite

He's posh, he comes from a wealthy family, he owns a business, he went to an elite school, he's old fashioned, he's eccentric.........he therefore must be a selfish parastic wker

Whereas working class people should never be judged based on accent, background or education because they are all decent, salt of the earth, honest people taken advantage of by the rich tossers


Fermit and Sexy Sarah

13,038 posts

101 months

Friday 26th July 2019
quotequote all
chrispmartha said:
That doesn't paint a pleasant picture.

The snobbish element. I don't care about his background, his accent, but the voting record does seem to show a disdain to those 'beneath' him.

chrispmartha

15,514 posts

130 months

Friday 26th July 2019
quotequote all
jonby said:
Dr Jekyll said:
markh1973 said:
jonby said:
Thankfully for you, JRM won't judge you based on your background the way you have judged him because of his
Not unless you went to state school that is.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/sta...
The article accuses him of saying that people who went to state schools are potted plants, then gives the full quote which shows he said nothing of the sort.
He was simply saying that he wanted intellectually able people, and if that meant a high proportion of those selected had been to Oxford or Cambridge so be it. Rather than take on people with other educational backgrounds simply for the sake of diversity but who might as well be potted plants.
Don't let facts get in the way of a good soundbite

He's posh, he comes from a wealthy family, he owns a business, he went to an elite school, he's old fashioned, he's eccentric.........he therefore must be a selfish parastic wker

Whereas working class people should never be judged based on accent, background or education because they are all decent, salt of the earth, honest people taken advantage of by the rich tossers
I’ve judged him by his views and voting records, nothing to do with class or accents

classicaholic

1,730 posts

71 months

Friday 26th July 2019
quotequote all
Jazzy Jag said:
yes
She stole my school milk.
Caused high levels of unemployment in milk monitors all over the country.
Good for her, I hated the school milk!

crankedup

25,764 posts

244 months

Friday 26th July 2019
quotequote all
chrispmartha said:
jonby said:
Dr Jekyll said:
markh1973 said:
jonby said:
Thankfully for you, JRM won't judge you based on your background the way you have judged him because of his
Not unless you went to state school that is.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/sta...
The article accuses him of saying that people who went to state schools are potted plants, then gives the full quote which shows he said nothing of the sort.
He was simply saying that he wanted intellectually able people, and if that meant a high proportion of those selected had been to Oxford or Cambridge so be it. Rather than take on people with other educational backgrounds simply for the sake of diversity but who might as well be potted plants.
Don't let facts get in the way of a good soundbite

He's posh, he comes from a wealthy family, he owns a business, he went to an elite school, he's old fashioned, he's eccentric.........he therefore must be a selfish parastic wker

Whereas working class people should never be judged based on accent, background or education because they are all decent, salt of the earth, honest people taken advantage of by the rich tossers
I’ve judged him by his views and voting records, nothing to do with class or accents
Which is entirely reasonable. The most important fact though is that he is representing his constituents, who vote him into Parliament. No different to Diana Abbott being voted into Parliament. Some might suggest that those two people are at almost opposite ends of the political and educational spectrum, I wouldn’t know. Funny old thing democracy.

Talaus

1,015 posts

258 months

Friday 26th July 2019
quotequote all
chrispmartha said:
So given his religious beliefs which accounts for his views on LGBT rights, where else do you think his voting warrants the judgement against him?

tangerine_sedge

4,810 posts

219 months

Friday 26th July 2019
quotequote all
Fermit and Sexy Sarah said:
chrispmartha said:
That doesn't paint a pleasant picture.

The snobbish element. I don't care about his background, his accent, but the voting record does seem to show a disdain to those 'beneath' him.
Snobbish and unaware of the benefits he's received in life, but somehow he and the other Eton boys are going to free us from the elites??

Boris and JRM would be corporate middle management at best if they'd been through the state system.

Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

262 months

Friday 26th July 2019
quotequote all
Pupp said:
No arguments on that, just offering an honest reaction in the context of the appointment... the HoC is supposed to represent commoners in the legislature; from my not exceptional perspective as a commoner, I cannot imagine someone less obviously suited to lead that representation.
I can think of plenty. The 2nd viscount Stansgate for one, he wasn't even a commoner.

chrispmartha

15,514 posts

130 months

Friday 26th July 2019
quotequote all
Talaus said:
chrispmartha said:
So given his religious beliefs which accounts for his views on LGBT rights, where else do you think his voting warrants the judgement against him?
I don't give monkeys if it's because of his religion, him voting against LGBT rights is alone enough for me to form a judgement on him but including the LGBT stuff here are some more

Consistently voted against equal gay rights

Consistently voted against smoking bans

Consistently voted against allowing marriage between two people of same sex

Generally voted against laws to promote equality and human rights

Voted against allowing terminally ill people to be given assistance to end their life

Voted against investigations into the Iraq war

Generally voted against a right to remain for EU nationals already in living in the UK

Consistently voted against raising welfare benefits at least in line with prices

Consistently voted against paying higher benefits over longer periods for those unable to work due to illness or disability

Consistently voted for making local councils responsible for helping those in financial need afford their council tax and reducing the amount spent on such support

Almost always voted for increasing the rate of VAT

Almost always voted against a banker’s bonus tax

...

But as I say his views on abortion and LGBT rights are enough for me to make a judgement on him

Gadgetmac

14,984 posts

109 months

Friday 26th July 2019
quotequote all
chrispmartha said:
But as I say his views on abortion and LGBT rights are enough for me to make a judgement on him
Yep, he’s a quasi religious fundamentalist.

gregs656

10,919 posts

182 months

Friday 26th July 2019
quotequote all
Talaus said:
So given his religious beliefs which accounts for his views on LGBT rights, where else do you think his voting warrants the judgement against him?
This is such an odd statement.

Why do his religious beliefs get a pass?

The Surveyor

7,576 posts

238 months

Friday 26th July 2019
quotequote all
chrispmartha said:
I don't give monkeys if it's because of his religion, him voting against LGBT rights is alone enough for me to form a judgement on him but including the LGBT stuff here are some more

Consistently voted against equal gay rights

Consistently voted against smoking bans

Consistently voted against allowing marriage between two people of same sex

Generally voted against laws to promote equality and human rights

Voted against allowing terminally ill people to be given assistance to end their life

Voted against investigations into the Iraq war

Generally voted against a right to remain for EU nationals already in living in the UK

Consistently voted against raising welfare benefits at least in line with prices

Consistently voted against paying higher benefits over longer periods for those unable to work due to illness or disability

Consistently voted for making local councils responsible for helping those in financial need afford their council tax and reducing the amount spent on such support

Almost always voted for increasing the rate of VAT

Almost always voted against a banker’s bonus tax

...

But as I say his views on abortion and LGBT rights are enough for me to make a judgement on him
It's amazing anybody votes for him at all, yet he's a democratically elected MP. rolleyes

NoNeed

15,137 posts

201 months

Friday 26th July 2019
quotequote all
chrispmartha said:
I don't give monkeys if it's because of his religion, him voting against LGBT rights is alone enough for me to form a judgement on him but including the LGBT stuff here are some more

Consistently voted against equal gay rights

Consistently voted against smoking bans

Consistently voted against allowing marriage between two people of same sex

Generally voted against laws to promote equality and human rights

Voted against allowing terminally ill people to be given assistance to end their life

Voted against investigations into the Iraq war

Generally voted against a right to remain for EU nationals already in living in the UK

Consistently voted against raising welfare benefits at least in line with prices

Consistently voted against paying higher benefits over longer periods for those unable to work due to illness or disability

Consistently voted for making local councils responsible for helping those in financial need afford their council tax and reducing the amount spent on such support

Almost always voted for increasing the rate of VAT

Almost always voted against a banker’s bonus tax

...

But as I say his views on abortion and LGBT rights are enough for me to make a judgement on him
Moggy and Bercow should work well together then

Gadgetmac

14,984 posts

109 months

Friday 26th July 2019
quotequote all
The Surveyor said:
It's amazing anybody votes for him at all, yet he's a democratically elected MP. rolleyes
So is Diane Abbot. What’s your point?

jonby

5,357 posts

158 months

Friday 26th July 2019
quotequote all
tangerine_sedge said:
Fermit and Sexy Sarah said:
chrispmartha said:
That doesn't paint a pleasant picture.

The snobbish element. I don't care about his background, his accent, but the voting record does seem to show a disdain to those 'beneath' him.
Snobbish and unaware of the benefits he's received in life, but somehow he and the other Eton boys are going to free us from the elites??

Boris and JRM would be corporate middle management at best if they'd been through the state system.
Boris got a scholarship both to Eton and to read classics at Bailiol, Oxford. Meaning that firstly despite whatever anyone may say, he's very far from stupid and secondly, he didn't need money to step outside the state system

Going back to JRM and all the posts about his voting record, this stemmed from his appointment to leader of the house, where his voting record has little relevance. Again, do people actually understand what that role entails ? I defy anyone to watch the youtube video I posted earlier of yesterday's performance and then say he isn't brilliantly suited to the job, no matter what your political persuasion.




jonby

5,357 posts

158 months

Friday 26th July 2019
quotequote all
Gadgetmac said:
The Surveyor said:
It's amazing anybody votes for him at all, yet he's a democratically elected MP. rolleyes
So is Diane Abbot. What’s your point?
Following on from my post above about Boris and his scholarships, it's only fair to mention that Diane Abbot also went to Oxford, at a time when for a black woman, that was no mean feat

She is an appalling performer in front of camera totally unsuited to being a front line politician, but she is far from stupid, however hard she seems to try convincing us otherwise in interviews. Incidentally I appreciate the poster above didn't say she is stupid

djc206

12,375 posts

126 months

Friday 26th July 2019
quotequote all
jonby said:
Following on from my post above about Boris and his scholarships, it's only fair to mention that Diane Abbot also went to Oxford, at a time when for a black woman, that was no mean feat

She is an appalling performer in front of camera totally unsuited to being a front line politician, but she is far from stupid, however hard she seems to try convincing us otherwise in interviews. Incidentally I appreciate the poster above didn't say she is stupid
She’s 65 and time has not been kind to her. I’m sure she was a very bright woman at some point but from what we’ve seen lately she has clearly suffered considerable mental degradation.

Why do politicians stick at it for so long? Most of the current crop of senior labour politicians are surely eligible to retire and live out their days drinking canned mojitos, tending to an allotment or ranting about Thatcher to hippies at Glasto.

Roofless Toothless

5,687 posts

133 months

Friday 26th July 2019
quotequote all
jonby said:
Boris got a scholarship both to Eton and to read classics at Bailiol, Oxford. Meaning that firstly despite whatever anyone may say, he's very far from stupid and secondly, he didn't need money to step outside the state system

Eton? That's where the messes come from, isn't it?

By the way, scholarships at Eton are worth up to 10% of the fees, which are at present some £40k per annum, so it is hardly a token of a superlative intellect overcoming an impoverished upbringing.

Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

262 months

Friday 26th July 2019
quotequote all
Roofless Toothless said:
jonby said:
Boris got a scholarship both to Eton and to read classics at Bailiol, Oxford. Meaning that firstly despite whatever anyone may say, he's very far from stupid and secondly, he didn't need money to step outside the state system

Eton? That's where the messes come from, isn't it?

By the way, scholarships at Eton are worth up to 10% of the fees, which are at present some £40k per annum, so it is hardly a token of a superlative intellect overcoming an impoverished upbringing.
A King's scholar (like Boris) gets an automatic 10% off, but they can get up to 100% off.

Roofless Toothless

5,687 posts

133 months

Friday 26th July 2019
quotequote all
Dr Jekyll said:
A King's scholar (like Boris) gets an automatic 10% off, but they can get up to 100% off.
I think what you are describing is a Bursary.

https://www.etoncollege.com/Scholarships.aspx