What a huge waste of public money
Discussion
TTmonkey said:
Sorry but the whole premise of this assault is rediculoous. She got fingered in a public place by a passing stranger in front of many witnesses, hilts wearing trousers?.....? FFs who on earth believed this?
And the unfortunate random chap singled out was holding a bag strap in one hand and a newspaper in the other. He really must have been a clever dick to accomplish the alleged assault in a fraction of a second. Smiler. said:
So are we allowed to have a stab at the identity of the complainant?
No, I know we aren't. But after looking at the picture in the Telegraph, reading the article & 5 minutes of deduction, I have a name.
There are even "facts" involved.
Are you allowed to drop hints?No, I know we aren't. But after looking at the picture in the Telegraph, reading the article & 5 minutes of deduction, I have a name.
There are even "facts" involved.
Looks like they have dark hair?
Mojooo said:
TTmonkey said:
If there was no sexual assault them she has no right to continued anonymity
I presume all that was decided was that they couldnt prove beyond reasonable doubt that he did it - which does not necessarily equate to it didn't happen (in all situations).turbobloke said:
Mojooo said:
TTmonkey said:
If there was no sexual assault them she has no right to continued anonymity
I presume all that was decided was that they couldnt prove beyond reasonable doubt that he did it - which does not necessarily equate to it didn't happen (in all situations).Mojooo said:
turbobloke said:
Mojooo said:
TTmonkey said:
If there was no sexual assault them she has no right to continued anonymity
I presume all that was decided was that they couldnt prove beyond reasonable doubt that he did it - which does not necessarily equate to it didn't happen (in all situations).It's clearly not a DM matter as firstly it's in the Telegraph with similar coverage, and secondly without a doubt no newspaper was involved in staging the CCTV evidence.
With all due respect to La Liga, it's pointless saying anything 'in general terms' as it were when faced with a particular example which is certainly not general.
Jasandjules said:
On the face of it this seems preposterous.
But one thing to always bear in mind is that what is reported in the press is not always wholly accurate.........
IF it is as reported however, I would hope that some CPS person would lose their job and this woman will be charged herself.
The video shows this chap with one hand on his rucksack strap and the other holding a newspaper. In every frame iirc. What was used for the penetration in a fraction of a second passing by? As I indicated earlier this would require a very clever dick to accomplish.But one thing to always bear in mind is that what is reported in the press is not always wholly accurate.........
IF it is as reported however, I would hope that some CPS person would lose their job and this woman will be charged herself.
saaby93 said:
turbobloke said:
and secondly without a doubt no newspaper was involved in staging the CCTV evidence.
Whats that he's holding shown in the cctv if it's not a newspaper?Nice.
However...unless we're told what it is, as you can't tell, it would be pointless to stage. Nobody would agree to be the stooge. Not that you were serious. Surely. Right?
Einion Yrth said:
Well they may do most of the time, no system is entirely error free. Someone's head should be rolling for this one though.
Accepting that no system is infallible, there ought to be some sort of back-up system such as someone actually looking at the evidence & considering it prior to bringing charges, Far-fetched & impractical, I realise, but a guy can dream.....................Doubtless various people will be along to defend this situation.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff