Balanced Question Time panel tonight - of course not! VOL 2
Discussion
///ajd said:
Sectoral analysis.
Bernard started to say "what should they analyse?"
Bloody hell Bernard. A bloodbath.
The economist is basically saying she is useless at forecasting the future......errrr.
What a shambles this is.
Can you name any one economist or politician who is good a predicting the future please, also can you list the qualifications you have to judge her/them.Bernard started to say "what should they analyse?"
Bloody hell Bernard. A bloodbath.
The economist is basically saying she is useless at forecasting the future......errrr.
What a shambles this is.
///ajd said:
don'tbesilly said:
Kate Andrews is the only one talking any sense.
She just agreed that Trump is right about Jerusalem. I'm hoping James McGrory will be on, so AN can hand him his ars* on a plate again
JMc is a Lib-Dem, you must be a fan
The Dangerous Elk said:
Can you name any one economist or politician who is good a predicting the future please, also can you list the qualifications you have to judge her/them.
The point is she is saying it as a brexiteer and she wants to deflect from the widely held views on economists of the impact of brexit. She can't afford to admit its a big negative.
She did say one of the big benefits of brexit is new trade deals? If she can't predict the future how the hell does she know that's a fact? Duplicitous nonsense - why is this not utterly transparent?
///ajd said:
She just agreed that Trump is right about Jerusalem.
That’s not right. He delivered on his manifesto promise
He was instructed to by a 100% support from the senate (that’s like the House of Lords).
It’s been policy since 1995
Who knows every other option has totally failed in solving the issue - maybe this will work/have more success ?(I doubt it).
Welshbeef said:
///ajd said:
She just agreed that Trump is right about Jerusalem.
That’s not right. He delivered on his manifesto promise
He was instructed to by a 100% support from the senate (that’s like the House of Lords).
It’s been policy since 1995
Who knows every other option has totally failed in solving the issue - maybe this will work/have more success ?(I doubt it).
It'll never sort itself out. Both sides aren't interested, the politicians need the turmoil to have something to do.
///ajd said:
The Dangerous Elk said:
Can you name any one economist or politician who is good a predicting the future please, also can you list the qualifications you have to judge her/them.
The point is she is saying it as a brexiteer and she wants to deflect from the widely held views on economists of the impact of brexit. She can't afford to admit its a big negative.
She did say one of the big benefits of brexit is new trade deals? If she can't predict the future how the hell does she know that's a fact? Duplicitous nonsense - why is this not utterly transparent?
Enuff already!
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff