Will JC Juncker get the chop?

[cayman-black]

kayc said:

00%..guy is a total joke..must spend a lot of personal time thinking how the fk do I get away with this!!

Yep, he is a legend! I could say a lot worse.

[rallycross]

cayman-black said:

Yep, he is a legend! I could say a lot worse.

funny because there is never anything bad shown about him on the BBC, ITV or Sky news!

[urquattroGus]

dandarez said:

768 said:

matrignano said:

Corruption exists at all level of politics, not sure why in the UK people are so focused on pointing out what goes on with the EU, when the same (at a smaller scale, granted), happens on their home turf.

That bit is why. With all our problems we just don't have someone on 400k supposedly running the place while rolling around pissed.

Not just that bit.
WE also get a chance to vote out our aholes, even if they may get replaced by another ahole.

I saw a piece recently about Mr Drunker and it made a good and valid point. It was asking how DOES creepy Juncker get away with all his lecherous pouting and kissing of others, not just women too?

The journo said he's like a lascivious, sozzled old lech, leering towards his prey. His droopy wet lips gaping.
There was this pic to illustrate.


‘Oh, oh,’ he chunters, before fluffing and lifting up the woman’s hair.
He pulls her in roughly for a kiss, then homes in on another blonde for an unreciprocated slobber.
The first lady turns to a camera and her face showed it all, she was absolutely mortified.
But this sex pest is the esteemed, or rather the 'steaming' head of the EU, so one must accept his harassment.
Yet on the other side of the pond, lesser offences have got 'Times Up' and 'Me Too' going hysterical.
The journo goes on to say if Juncker was Trump, there would be a law suit filed!

So why aren't all the young Remainer anti Trump Me Too females jumping up and down about this lecherous git?
Because he's head of their lovely jubbly EU and anything goes?
This vastly overpaid idiot who remoaners back is the one shaping OUR destiny, while he casually slobbers (females) and staggers on…

The sooner we have left, completely, the better!

You hit the nail on the head!

[Burwood]

He retires in 6-8 months. He’s getting a good suck of the titty before he goes.

[B'stard Child]

urquattroGus said:

dandarez said:

768 said:

matrignano said:

Corruption exists at all level of politics, not sure why in the UK people are so focused on pointing out what goes on with the EU, when the same (at a smaller scale, granted), happens on their home turf.

That bit is why. With all our problems we just don't have someone on 400k supposedly running the place while rolling around pissed.

Not just that bit.
WE also get a chance to vote out our aholes, even if they may get replaced by another ahole.

I saw a piece recently about Mr Drunker and it made a good and valid point. It was asking how DOES creepy Juncker get away with all his lecherous pouting and kissing of others, not just women too?

The journo said he's like a lascivious, sozzled old lech, leering towards his prey. His droopy wet lips gaping.

<snip>

So why aren't all the young Remainer anti Trump Me Too females jumping up and down about this lecherous git?
Because he's head of their lovely jubbly EU and anything goes?
This vastly overpaid idiot who remoaners back is the one shaping OUR destiny, while he casually slobbers (females) and staggers on…

The sooner we have left, completely, the better!

You hit the nail on the head!

+1 but he's been pretty instrumental in the UK attempting to leave so I'll forgive him if we do

[Robertj21a]

B'stard Child said:

+1 but he's been pretty instrumental in the UK attempting to leave so I'll forgive him if we do

True. Anyone not too sure about which way to vote has probably got Juncker at the back of their mind when they are considering who is behind the EU.

[Digga]

Robertj21a said:

B'stard Child said:

+1 but he's been pretty instrumental in the UK attempting to leave so I'll forgive him if we do

True. Anyone not too sure about which way to vote has probably got Juncker at the back of their mind when they are considering who is behind the EU.

It is a great shame that the likes of Juncker (he is by no means the only proponent) have been so intractable and unwilling to address the contemporary challenges that are stoking the nationalist, anti-EU movements in the various nations. Any organisation or empire must adapt to survive. Dogma does not trump all.

[frisbee]

He nicely wound up moron May with his nebulous comment so he should get some sort of bonus for that.

[arguti]

i had heard that he had never been to the UK - wonder if it is true?

[Digga]

arguti said:

i had heard that he had never been to the UK - wonder if it is true?

Probably be wise to keep it that way too.

[anonymous-user]

arguti said:

i had heard that he had never been to the UK - wonder if it is true?

Neet trick having a meeting in No10 with May, the contents of which his team leaked, if he hasn't.

[Puggit]

jsf said:

arguti said:

i had heard that he had never been to the UK - wonder if it is true?

Neet trick having a meeting in No10 with May, the contents of which his team leaked, if he hasn't.

Indeed:

[768]

arguti said:

i had heard that he had never been to the UK - wonder if it is true?

But does it really count if you were too drunk to remember?

[Robertj21a]

At least the EU has a Pin Up face that merely reminds the UK of why they want to leave. A great shame they didn't remove him a couple of years back.

[anonymous-user]

Robertj21a said:

...A great shame they didn't remove him a couple of years back.

When one of the biggest contributors to the EU budget objected so strongly to his appointment in the first place and was ignored it sent out a perfectly clear message that the UK could go fvck it's self. I don't imagine that won many remain votes.

[Robertj21a]

fblm said:

Robertj21a said:

...A great shame they didn't remove him a couple of years back.

When one of the biggest contributors to the EU budget objected so strongly to his appointment in the first place and was ignored it sent out a perfectly clear message that the UK could go fvck it's self. I don't imagine that won many remain votes.

Yes, very true. It also reminds Leavers as to how little power they have to influence even such a small part of the EU infrastructure.

[AshVX220]

Robertj21a said:

fblm said:

Robertj21a said:

...A great shame they didn't remove him a couple of years back.

When one of the biggest contributors to the EU budget objected so strongly to his appointment in the first place and was ignored it sent out a perfectly clear message that the UK could go fvck it's self. I don't imagine that won many remain votes.

Yes, very true. It also reminds Leavers as to how little power they have to influence even such a small part of the EU infrastructure.

But the remainers Mantra is "we can change the EU better from within......", like the EU will ever allow itself to change. Deluded fools.