Angela Merkel

Author
Discussion

amgmcqueen

3,346 posts

150 months

Tuesday 16th May 2017
quotequote all
What is Germany's obsession with dominating and controlling Europe?

They couldn't do it via WW1 and WW2, so they've gone through the back door and achieved it politically.

Robertj21a

16,477 posts

105 months

Tuesday 16th May 2017
quotequote all
amgmcqueen said:
What is Germany's obsession with dominating and controlling Europe?

They couldn't do it via WW1 and WW2, so they've gone through the back door and achieved it politically.
I would have said that they had achieved it economically !

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 16th May 2017
quotequote all
StevieBee said:
The EU is principally an economic institution and by dint of the fact that Germany is the most populous EU nation, it holds the greatest number of Euros and therefore has more influence than, say, Italy.

For a similar reason the US Dollar is the international currency as there are more Dollars knocking around than any other currency.

It's a little vague and abstract and others more versed in this may explain it better than I
The status of the US Dollar as the global currency isn't anything to do with how much exists, it's all about the structures that backstop the currency and the political decisions that were made during WW2 to create a financial world system that would become the basis for finance when WW2 ended. This agreement, known as the Bretton Woods System created the IMF and what became the world bank. Part of the agreement was that the US dollar would be the reference currency because they held 2/3 of the worlds gold reserves at the time. The pegging of this system to the US dollar and that being based on a Gold Standard led to the cold war, because Russia wouldn't agree to this.

This all worked fairly well until Nixon got into power and decided to kill the peg of the US dollar to gold reserves, blowing up the gold standard. This led to floating currencies and a large number of countries decided at that time they wanted to still peg themselves to the US Dollar, so that became the world reserve currency. At the same time as Nixon blew up the system, the GBP became a fully floating currency.

It may surprise a lot of people, but prior to the GBP and USD being the world reserve currencies, in the 19th century it was the Dutch Gilder that was used because of the global dominance of the Dutch east India company.

What we are seeing now boosting the USD is that the Eurozone area is in a trade surplus position to the rest of the world and that excess money isn't being invested in Europe, it's being shipped into the USD because the EURO isn't seen as a safe bet. The same thing is happening with China, where huge sums of money are being shipped out of China because the Chinese don't trust their government to not one day just turn round and steal their money.

This is also driving the global property boom in the world cities, because the Chinese consider investing their money into property they will never see is safer than one day losing it all when the Government decides to grab it. The wealthy Chinese are putting their money in countries where they see stability not only financially, but politically. This is why the Eurozone is utterly screwed, because it's not a stable political or financial system so they wont invest into it. It's why London property sored because the GBP and the British political system is seen as fundamentally stable. Currently, the UK, USA and AUS have put capital controls in place to stop the Chinese buying up everything in sight.

Unfortunately for most of Europe, the EU have created a currency that isn't a real currency when you get to the structures behind it. It's fundamentally unstable and was created with treaty rules that don't allow it to function as a proper currency, it's going to take a huge event in Europe to fix it, which will mean it will fragment into at least two currencies, maybe more. That's going to send Europe into a massive deflation and a lot of pain will happen. whist the systems sort themselves out.

The only way the USD will weaken significantly, is if foreign investors see it as no longer stable politically. It's got absolutely nothing to do with how the US economy itself performs. This is bad news for US companies that want to export, because their currency is too expensive and there is nothing they can do about it, even if the economy crashes, the USD will stay high. War with China will sort that problem out.




Edited by anonymous-user on Tuesday 16th May 20:29

StevieBee

12,893 posts

255 months

Wednesday 17th May 2017
quotequote all
jsf said:
StevieBee said:
The EU is principally an economic institution and by dint of the fact that Germany is the most populous EU nation, it holds the greatest number of Euros and therefore has more influence than, say, Italy.

For a similar reason the US Dollar is the international currency as there are more Dollars knocking around than any other currency.

It's a little vague and abstract and others more versed in this may explain it better than I
The status of the US Dollar as the global currency isn't anything to do with how much exists, it's all about the structures that backstop the currency and the political decisions that were made during WW2 to create a financial world system that would become the basis for finance when WW2 ended. This agreement, known as the Bretton Woods System created the IMF and what became the world bank. Part of the agreement was that the US dollar would be the reference currency because they held 2/3 of the worlds gold reserves at the time. The pegging of this system to the US dollar and that being based on a Gold Standard led to the cold war, because Russia wouldn't agree to this.

This all worked fairly well until Nixon got into power and decided to kill the peg of the US dollar to gold reserves, blowing up the gold standard. This led to floating currencies and a large number of countries decided at that time they wanted to still peg themselves to the US Dollar, so that became the world reserve currency. At the same time as Nixon blew up the system, the GBP became a fully floating currency.

It may surprise a lot of people, but prior to the GBP and USD being the world reserve currencies, in the 19th century it was the Dutch Gilder that was used because of the global dominance of the Dutch east India company.

What we are seeing now boosting the USD is that the Eurozone area is in a trade surplus position to the rest of the world and that excess money isn't being invested in Europe, it's being shipped into the USD because the EURO isn't seen as a safe bet. The same thing is happening with China, where huge sums of money are being shipped out of China because the Chinese don't trust their government to not one day just turn round and steal their money.

This is also driving the global property boom in the world cities, because the Chinese consider investing their money into property they will never see is safer than one day losing it all when the Government decides to grab it. The wealthy Chinese are putting their money in countries where they see stability not only financially, but politically. This is why the Eurozone is utterly screwed, because it's not a stable political or financial system so they wont invest into it. It's why London property sored because the GBP and the British political system is seen as fundamentally stable. Currently, the UK, USA and AUS have put capital controls in place to stop the Chinese buying up everything in sight.

Unfortunately for most of Europe, the EU have created a currency that isn't a real currency when you get to the structures behind it. It's fundamentally unstable and was created with treaty rules that don't allow it to function as a proper currency, it's going to take a huge event in Europe to fix it, which will mean it will fragment into at least two currencies, maybe more. That's going to send Europe into a massive deflation and a lot of pain will happen. whist the systems sort themselves out.

The only way the USD will weaken significantly, is if foreign investors see it as no longer stable politically. It's got absolutely nothing to do with how the US economy itself performs. This is bad news for US companies that want to export, because their currency is too expensive and there is nothing they can do about it, even if the economy crashes, the USD will stay high. War with China will sort that problem out.

Edited by jsf on Tuesday 16th May 20:29
Very interesting. Thanks for that.

How nice to be corrected with considered detail and without first being called a tt! .....you're in danger of giving PH a bad name!

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 17th May 2017
quotequote all
Sorry about that. biggrin

We are seeing today how the USD is based on political stability.

grumbledoak

31,535 posts

233 months

Wednesday 17th May 2017
quotequote all
The dollar is also stored by states in reserve against oil, because oil is priced in dollars. Price oil in something else, states will sell dollars to buy the new hedge currency. The effect of selling half(?) the dollar value on Earth would be difficult to miss.

Saddam threatened to price in Euros.

egomeister

6,700 posts

263 months

Wednesday 17th May 2017
quotequote all
grumbledoak said:
The dollar is also stored by states in reserve against oil, because oil is priced in dollars. Price oil in something else, states will sell dollars to buy the new hedge currency. The effect of selling half(?) the dollar value on Earth would be difficult to miss.

Saddam threatened to price in Euros.
The dollar system is starting to crack now though. Russia are pricing oil in rubles, China have a yuan gold market. They are both developing parallel payments systems to not be dependent on SWIFT too...

grumbledoak

31,535 posts

233 months

Wednesday 17th May 2017
quotequote all
Operation Russian and Chinese Freedom coming up. Should be interesting.

amgmcqueen

3,346 posts

150 months

Thursday 18th May 2017
quotequote all
http://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/news/angela-merkel-...

Has she been on the weed again? Does she even understand why Brexit happened?

Once again, staggering arrogance shown from the self-appointed Furher of Europe!

s2art

18,937 posts

253 months

Thursday 18th May 2017
quotequote all
amgmcqueen said:
http://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/news/angela-merkel-...

Has she been on the weed again? Does she even understand why Brexit happened?

Once again, staggering arrogance shown from the self-appointed Furher of Europe!
Remember, she is up for re-election.

Disastrous

10,083 posts

217 months

Thursday 18th May 2017
quotequote all
amgmcqueen said:
http://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/news/angela-merkel-...

Has she been on the weed again? Does she even understand why Brexit happened?

Once again, staggering arrogance shown from the self-appointed Furher of Europe!
What else is she meant to say??

Countdown

39,899 posts

196 months

Thursday 18th May 2017
quotequote all
amgmcqueen said:
http://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/news/angela-merkel-...

Has she been on the weed again? Does she even understand why Brexit happened?

Once again, staggering arrogance shown from the self-appointed Furher of Europe!
She's saying that we're going to be worse off as a result of Brexit. Lots ok Leavers said they didn't care, "it was worth it to get our country back"....

48% of British voters can't understand why Brexit happened either....

fido

16,797 posts

255 months

Thursday 18th May 2017
quotequote all
Countdown said:
48% of British voters can't understand why Brexit happened either....
Latest YouGov poll says only 22% are against Brexit. Pretty much reflected in the election polls as well (if we assume this is essentially Referendum 2.0).

Sway

26,277 posts

194 months

Thursday 18th May 2017
quotequote all
Disastrous said:
amgmcqueen said:
http://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/news/angela-merkel-...

Has she been on the weed again? Does she even understand why Brexit happened?

Once again, staggering arrogance shown from the self-appointed Furher of Europe!
What else is she meant to say??
Well the last thing I'd expect someone looking for reelection to say is that they'd make life difficult for German companies to sell car components to a different country...

Ignoring the ridiculous nature of that comment when she's trying to appeal to German voters, not EU apparatchiks, how on earth does she even think that's achievable?

Disastrous

10,083 posts

217 months

Thursday 18th May 2017
quotequote all
Sway said:
Disastrous said:
amgmcqueen said:
http://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/news/angela-merkel-...

Has she been on the weed again? Does she even understand why Brexit happened?

Once again, staggering arrogance shown from the self-appointed Furher of Europe!
What else is she meant to say??
Well the last thing I'd expect someone looking for reelection to say is that they'd make life difficult for German companies to sell car components to a different country...

Ignoring the ridiculous nature of that comment when she's trying to appeal to German voters, not EU apparatchiks, how on earth does she even think that's achievable?
I'm not sure she thinks it is - do politicians only say things they think they can achieve?

Bottom line is, the EU countries will need to be seen to be coming down hard on the UK. They would be derelict in their responsibility towards the EU if they didn't make it as hard as possible for anyone trying to leave it.

The European people are very offended, if that's the right term, by Britain voting out, so I'd expect that to play quite well.

Though as someone asked a few pages back, no, my German in-laws aren't high level EU economists so obviously you need to take that into account hehe

Robertj21a

16,477 posts

105 months

Thursday 18th May 2017
quotequote all
Countdown said:
She's saying that we're going to be worse off as a result of Brexit. Lots ok Leavers said they didn't care, "it was worth it to get our country back"....

48% of British voters can't understand why Brexit happened either....
I think you meant to say '48% of British voters took much longer than others to appreciate the benefits of Brexit.

jjlynn27

7,935 posts

109 months

Thursday 18th May 2017
quotequote all
Robertj21a said:
I think you meant to say '48% of British voters took much longer than others to appreciate the benefits of Brexit.
What benefit of Brexit are you appreciating?

Sway

26,277 posts

194 months

Thursday 18th May 2017
quotequote all
Disastrous said:
Sway said:
Disastrous said:
amgmcqueen said:
http://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/news/angela-merkel-...

Has she been on the weed again? Does she even understand why Brexit happened?

Once again, staggering arrogance shown from the self-appointed Furher of Europe!
What else is she meant to say??
Well the last thing I'd expect someone looking for reelection to say is that they'd make life difficult for German companies to sell car components to a different country...

Ignoring the ridiculous nature of that comment when she's trying to appeal to German voters, not EU apparatchiks, how on earth does she even think that's achievable?
I'm not sure she thinks it is - do politicians only say things they think they can achieve?

Bottom line is, the EU countries will need to be seen to be coming down hard on the UK. They would be derelict in their responsibility towards the EU if they didn't make it as hard as possible for anyone trying to leave it.

The European people are very offended, if that's the right term, by Britain voting out, so I'd expect that to play quite well.

Though as someone asked a few pages back, no, my German in-laws aren't high level EU economists so obviously you need to take that into account hehe
She may not think it's workable, but as a very specific measure to punish Britain for leaving it's absolutely daft. Who on earth in Germany would think it's a good idea to punish Britain by making German companies' lives harder to trade with us?

I'm friends, and work with, lots of Europeans. The plural of anecdote isn't evidence, but I'm yet to see anything that even closely shows normal European Citizens are offended by Brexit. A couple are at most 'disappointed', most are indifferent, a couple envious.

This isn't a message to gain support from the German people, it's squarely aimed at the apparatchiks - who aren't her electorate.

This for me is one of the biggest issues with the EU - the national politicians have started putting 'the EU' above the interests of their own people...

jjlynn27

7,935 posts

109 months

Thursday 18th May 2017
quotequote all
fido said:
Latest YouGov poll says only 22% are against Brexit. Pretty much reflected in the election polls as well (if we assume this is essentially Referendum 2.0).
That would be a rather idiotic assumption. I will vote Tory as our MP is rather good, I'm in the exceptionally safe Tory area. I still think that Brexit is a very bad idea.

dudleybloke

19,834 posts

186 months

Thursday 18th May 2017
quotequote all
The only reasonable way to settle this is for Merkel and May to fight it out in a cage match.
I want the media rights though!