Discussion
Follow up statement
https://twitter.com/Humberbeat/status/108989990017...
It's gone down about as well as you'd expect
https://twitter.com/Humberbeat/status/108989990017...
It's gone down about as well as you'd expect
If he simply went "no comment" would they bother looking any further into it? I.e, would they go to the trouble of obtaining IP addresses and trying to prove he was using his device at the time the comment was posted to prove it definitely was him or would they quietly walk away?
Most normal people who have little experience with the law think this sort of thing can be dismissed with rationale and common sense and end up incriminating themselves when they go "yeah I posted it, so what, it's a joke!"
Most normal people who have little experience with the law think this sort of thing can be dismissed with rationale and common sense and end up incriminating themselves when they go "yeah I posted it, so what, it's a joke!"
West Yorkshire Police with another PR masterstroke.........
https://twitter.com/WestYorksPolice/status/1098225...
https://twitter.com/WestYorksPolice/status/1098225...
Russian Troll Bot said:
West Yorkshire Police with another PR masterstroke.........
https://twitter.com/WestYorksPolice/status/1098225...
It might be a spoof from people trying to make them look like either incompetent numpties or politically correct pillocks who glory in awards for not bothering to do their jobs whilst others suffer.https://twitter.com/WestYorksPolice/status/1098225...
Alternatively it might be genuine.............
What many people dont realise is that close to four thousand were arrested last year for "Speech crimes", so next time you hear some chief constable bleating about lack of resources remind them of the thousands of hours wasted on this nonsense.
Its long past time this country got a grip of this s
te, equality does not mean some sections of society can be more hurt by words than others.
Its long past time this country got a grip of this s
te, equality does not mean some sections of society can be more hurt by words than others.dasigty said:
What many people dont realise is that close to four thousand were arrested last year for "Speech crimes", so next time you hear some chief constable bleating about lack of resources remind them of the thousands of hours wasted on this nonsense.
Its long past time this country got a grip of this ste, equality does not mean some sections of society can be more hurt by words than others.
Treated as blasphemy laws by some in places that don't have them.Its long past time this country got a grip of this s
te, equality does not mean some sections of society can be more hurt by words than others.Mothersruin said:
Treated as blasphemy laws by some in places that don't have them.
Funny that it was the lefties that fought tooth and nail against blasphemy laws in the sixties but are now the main supporters of them under "Equality", seems its ok to suppress free speech only when it suits their agenda.dasigty said:
Mothersruin said:
Treated as blasphemy laws by some in places that don't have them.
Funny that it was the lefties that fought tooth and nail against blasphemy laws in the sixties but are now the main supporters of them under "Equality", seems its ok to suppress free speech only when it suits their agenda.Funny to see even the Police’s recruitment procedures have now been deemed a hate crime.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/02/22/police...
Seems to be a very fine line between Positive Action and Positive Discrimination one lost in cultural Marxist doublespeak.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/02/22/police...
Seems to be a very fine line between Positive Action and Positive Discrimination one lost in cultural Marxist doublespeak.
A teenager prosecuted after posting rap lyrics including the N-word on Instagram had her conviction overturned today.
https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-new...
https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-new...
Ratski83 said:
Funny to see even the Police’s recruitment procedures have now been deemed a hate crime.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/02/22/police...
Seems to be a very fine line between Positive Action and Positive Discrimination one lost in cultural Marxist doublespeak.
What the fhttps://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/02/22/police...
Seems to be a very fine line between Positive Action and Positive Discrimination one lost in cultural Marxist doublespeak.
k does that have to do with Marxism? You are the one using doublespeak and clouding issues I would suggest biggbn said:
Ratski83 said:
Funny to see even the Police’s recruitment procedures have now been deemed a hate crime.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/02/22/police...
Seems to be a very fine line between Positive Action and Positive Discrimination one lost in cultural Marxist doublespeak.
What the fhttps://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/02/22/police...
Seems to be a very fine line between Positive Action and Positive Discrimination one lost in cultural Marxist doublespeak.
k does that have to do with Marxism? You are the one using doublespeak and clouding issues I would suggest 8.4L 154 said:
Not a lot to do with hate crime either. I cant see any element of hate, and the closest it comes to crime is that its a story about a police force.
You have obviously not been following what the police of today deem as a "Hate crime" then, ANYTHING that COULD cause ANYONE some kind of claim to be offended is pursued with vigour by the gallant boys in blue.This is only unusual in that the claimant is not a minority, but the judge applied the "Law" equally for a change.
dasigty said:
You have obviously not been following what the police of today deem as a "Hate crime" then, ANYTHING that COULD cause ANYONE some kind of claim to be offended is pursued with vigour by the gallant boys in blue.
This is only unusual in that the claimant is not a minority, but the judge applied the "Law" equally for a change.
It would be a hate incident rather tan a crime. No crime has occured hereThis is only unusual in that the claimant is not a minority, but the judge applied the "Law" equally for a change.
A hate incident is any non-crime perceived by the victim or any other person, as being motivated by prejudice or hate'.
A hate crime or hate incident is based upon any of the following,
race or ethnicity
sexual orientation
religion or belief
disability
transgender identity
Bigends said:
It would be a hate incident rather tan a crime. No crime has occured here
A hate incident is any non-crime perceived by the victim or any other person, as being motivated by prejudice or hate'.
A hate crime or hate incident is based upon any of the following,
race or ethnicity
sexual orientation
religion or belief
disability
transgender identity
Its the police themselves who refer to any incident as a "Hate crime" when compiling statistics used to justify their failure in other areas of police work.A hate incident is any non-crime perceived by the victim or any other person, as being motivated by prejudice or hate'.
A hate crime or hate incident is based upon any of the following,
race or ethnicity
sexual orientation
religion or belief
disability
transgender identity
Nor has causing anyone offence ever been a "Crime" under British law, the opposite is true, you have the right to freedom of speech that is supposedly protected in law, that it is currently not is the only crime with any of these incidents.
dasigty said:
Its the police themselves who refer to any incident as a "Hate crime" when compiling statistics used to justify their failure in other areas of police work.
No they don't. You need to understand the difference between crimes and incidents. There aren't many of the former.
La Liga said:
dasigty said:
Its the police themselves who refer to any incident as a "Hate crime" when compiling statistics used to justify their failure in other areas of police work.
No they don't. You need to understand the difference between crimes and incidents. There aren't many of the former.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff