Jeremy Corbyn Vol. 2
Discussion
Jockman said:
The Tories have not lost any traction with over 65s. These people count as they vote en masse.
Labour has gained traction with 18-24 year olds. These people are regarded as unreliable voters.
I'm beginning to think that the only reason the polls are changing is that they are weighting answers from groups differently. One week they think that 20% of young people will actually vote, the next week they think it'll be 30%.Labour has gained traction with 18-24 year olds. These people are regarded as unreliable voters.
The raw answers to the poll questions probably haven't changed. It's all a marketing job by the polling companies to sell their product.
alock said:
Jockman said:
The Tories have not lost any traction with over 65s. These people count as they vote en masse.
Labour has gained traction with 18-24 year olds. These people are regarded as unreliable voters.
I'm beginning to think that the only reason the polls are changing is that they are weighting answers from groups differently. One week they think that 20% of young people will actually vote, the next week they think it'll be 30%.Labour has gained traction with 18-24 year olds. These people are regarded as unreliable voters.
The raw answers to the poll questions probably haven't changed. It's all a marketing job by the polling companies to sell their product.
Burwood said:
alock said:
Jockman said:
The Tories have not lost any traction with over 65s. These people count as they vote en masse.
Labour has gained traction with 18-24 year olds. These people are regarded as unreliable voters.
I'm beginning to think that the only reason the polls are changing is that they are weighting answers from groups differently. One week they think that 20% of young people will actually vote, the next week they think it'll be 30%.Labour has gained traction with 18-24 year olds. These people are regarded as unreliable voters.
The raw answers to the poll questions probably haven't changed. It's all a marketing job by the polling companies to sell their product.
They are usually used by people to give the Govt a bloody nose.
Jockman said:
Burwood said:
alock said:
Jockman said:
The Tories have not lost any traction with over 65s. These people count as they vote en masse.
Labour has gained traction with 18-24 year olds. These people are regarded as unreliable voters.
I'm beginning to think that the only reason the polls are changing is that they are weighting answers from groups differently. One week they think that 20% of young people will actually vote, the next week they think it'll be 30%.Labour has gained traction with 18-24 year olds. These people are regarded as unreliable voters.
The raw answers to the poll questions probably haven't changed. It's all a marketing job by the polling companies to sell their product.
They are usually used by people to give the Govt a bloody nose.
However we need to factor in the stumbles TM has made during the last two weeks, even given a more negative bias to account for the stumbles the results should still have the Conservatives winning a clear majority.
However I am still s
tting myself.
Justayellowbadge said:
Corbyn was poor, but apparently some bloke in Wigan just placed 50p on a labour victory at Ladbrookes and as a result the polls are predicting the Tories to get less seats than the greens.
May forecast to concede and resign by tea time.
Am I doing this right, Yipster?
LOLMay forecast to concede and resign by tea time.
Am I doing this right, Yipster?
Corbyn just let a cat out of the bag in the BBC election debate. On immigration, he just said he would manage immigration and allow family reunion.
In other words, any immigrants here now would be able to bring the rest of their family over.
In other words, unmanaged 'open door' immigration.
In other words, any immigrants here now would be able to bring the rest of their family over.
In other words, unmanaged 'open door' immigration.
Cobnapint said:
Corbyn just let a cat out of the bag in the BBC election debate. On immigration, he just said he would manage immigration and allow family reunion.
In other words, any immigrants here now would be able to bring the rest of their family over.
In other words, unmanaged 'open door' immigration.
Importing poverty is a Labour policy for a reason!In other words, any immigrants here now would be able to bring the rest of their family over.
In other words, unmanaged 'open door' immigration.
fblm said:
Cobnapint said:
Corbyn just let a cat out of the bag in the BBC election debate. On immigration, he just said he would manage immigration and allow family reunion.
In other words, any immigrants here now would be able to bring the rest of their family over.
In other words, unmanaged 'open door' immigration.
Importing poverty is a Labour policy for a reason!In other words, any immigrants here now would be able to bring the rest of their family over.
In other words, unmanaged 'open door' immigration.
Lance Catamaran said:
Watching BBC News and see his mob took over the road outside, with footage of him being cheered and Rudd being booed like it's some sort of pantomime.
The Corbynite far left in full howl, most edifying. Their 'leader' deserves them; if only he could get Labour's MPs onside as opposed to 'who the ferk has yet to resign and who else still has a pulse' which are the current criteria for populating his shadow cabinet.Maybe the morning newspapers will advise on the spittle quotient this time.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff