Could UK U-turn on Referendum Result (Vol 2)

[BlackLabel]

It will be interesting to see what happens to EU immigration over the next 2 years prior to the article 50 period expiring. It wouldn't be a surprise to see significantly more immigration from then EU in the next two years than we've seen over the past 4 or 5 years.

[p1stonhead]

BlackLabel said:

It will be interesting to see what happens to EU immigration over the next 2 years prior to the article 50 period expiring. It wouldn't be a surprise to see significantly more immigration from then EU in the next two years than we've seen over the past 4 or 5 years.

if its not instant, itll be a huge rush id expect.

And interesting that she says parliament will have a say on whether they like the final deal. I wonder what will happen if a majority dont like it?

Edited by p1stonhead on Tuesday 17th January 12:38

[bazza white]

Quick question, why cant trade agreement talks with other nations begin now for agreements to start when we leave the EU.

[Jockman]

bazza white said:

Quick question, why cant trade agreement talks with other nations begin now for agreements to start when we leave the EU.

They have.

[alfie2244]

bazza white said:

Quick question, why cant trade agreement talks with other nations begin now for agreements to start when we leave the EU.

Eu tell us we can't..what they would do if we ignored them is anybody's guess.

[Jockman]

alfie2244 said:

bazza white said:

Quick question, why cant trade agreement talks with other nations begin now for agreements to start when we leave the EU.

Eu tell us we can't..what they would do if we ignored them is anybody's guess.

Alfie we can talk to whoever we like......just can't sign anything.

[FiF]

Jockman said:

bazza white said:

Quick question, why cant trade agreement talks with other nations begin now for agreements to start when we leave the EU.

They have.

And yet, after the news from Trump of a deal, the EU response was that it would be illegal for the UK to even start any negotiations until the day after we leave. Personally I think they are talking ballocks.

[Jockman]

BlackLabel said:

It will be interesting to see what happens to EU immigration over the next 2 years prior to the article 50 period expiring. It wouldn't be a surprise to see significantly more immigration from then EU in the next two years than we've seen over the past 4 or 5 years.

Why would they want to come here. Aren't we about to implode?

[Jockman]

FiF said:

Jockman said:

bazza white said:

Quick question, why cant trade agreement talks with other nations begin now for agreements to start when we leave the EU.

They have.

And yet, after the news from Trump of a deal, the EU response was that it would be illegal for the UK to even start any negotiations until the day after we leave. Personally I think they are talking ballocks.

Weren't we talking trade with the chap from NZ too?

[alfie2244]

FiF said:

Jockman said:

bazza white said:

Quick question, why cant trade agreement talks with other nations begin now for agreements to start when we leave the EU.

They have.

And yet, after the news from Trump of a deal, the EU response was that it would be illegal for the UK to even start any negotiations until the day after we leave. Personally I think they are talking ballocks.

That is waht I was led to believe.....no negotiations until we have left.

[chris watton]

Well, I think it's now quite safe to say that no, the UK will not be doing U-turn on the referendum result.

[loose cannon]

Amen close the thread !

[alfie2244]

chris watton said:

Well, I think it's now quite safe to say that no, the UK will not be doing U-turn on the referendum result.

So what about these Judges?

Also what happens after the 2 votes in HOL & HOC if they don't agree the deal after negotiations?

[p1stonhead]

alfie2244 said:

chris watton said:

Well, I think it's now quite safe to say that no, the UK will not be doing U-turn on the referendum result.

So what about these Judges?

Also what happens after the 2 votes in HOL & HOC if they don't agree the deal after negotiations?

Second Ref on the deal on the table or G.E are the only options I can see.

Basically a huge fking mess to wade through!

Edited by p1stonhead on Tuesday 17th January 13:18

[rscott]

barryrs said:

rscott said:

bmw535i said:

rscott said:

Presumably she'll announce some changes to non EU migration rules to take effect immediately? If she's serious about reducing migration, that has to be part of the strategy.

Possibly, although that is already an area where there are more and more controls imposed regularly (as discussed previously)

So we should see it drop fairly substantially over the next year or so?

I think we will see an increase in the short term however once the rules that apply to the rest of the world apply to all I expect to see a reduction in unskilled migration.

I personally expect immigration levels to remain fairly consistent with a more diverse makeup.

Non-EU migration seems to have been between 150,000 & 250,000 per year for the past 20 years or so. I'd assume that'll remain at a similar level going forward.

[don4l]

Brexit apparently means "Brexit".

Who'd a thunk it?

[alfie2244]

p1stonhead said:

alfie2244 said:

chris watton said:

Well, I think it's now quite safe to say that no, the UK will not be doing U-turn on the referendum result.

So what about these Judges?

Also what happens after the 2 votes in HOL & HOC if they don't agree the deal after negotiations?

Second Ref on the deal on the table or G.E are the only options I can see.

Basically a huge fking mess to wade through!

Edited by p1stonhead on Tuesday 17th January 13:18

Knobhead Farron spitting his dummy out and wants a referendum.

[p1stonhead]

alfie2244 said:

p1stonhead said:

alfie2244 said:

chris watton said:

Well, I think it's now quite safe to say that no, the UK will not be doing U-turn on the referendum result.

So what about these Judges?

Also what happens after the 2 votes in HOL & HOC if they don't agree the deal after negotiations?

Second Ref on the deal on the table or G.E are the only options I can see.

Basically a huge fking mess to wade through!

Edited by p1stonhead on Tuesday 17th January 13:18

Knobhead Farron spitting his dummy out and wants a referendum.

If the government cant agree between themselves though and come to a stalemate, what other choice would there be? I genuinely dont know how else it could happen - take it out of their hands surely? Albeit, another ref would be ridiculous, how else could it go through unless they put it back to the people and agree they would just so what we said?

It wouldnt be 'Leave/Stay' it would be;

1. Leave as presented!
2. Try again please....

Actually yeah, that wouldnt work very well

Edited by p1stonhead on Tuesday 17th January 13:30

[paulrockliffe]

p1stonhead said:

If the government cant agree between themselves though and come to a stalemate, what other choice would there be? I genuinely dont know how else it could happen - take it out of their hands surely? Albeit, another ref would be ridiculous, how else could it go through unless they put it back to the people and agree they would just so what we said?

It would be 'Leave/Stay' it would be;

1. Leave as presented!
2. Try again please....

Actually yeah, that wouldnt work very well

It would be leave as presented or leave as dictated by the treaty.

There won't be a referendum, a GE with manfiesto commitment would be a more certain vehicle to use to get a mandate.

Edited by paulrockliffe on Tuesday 17th January 13:30

[chris watton]

KimJongHealthy said:

Funny since the message sent to the world was the exact opposite - we don't want you here, we don't want to trade with you, so long, and thanks for all the fish.

Is that really the message, or is that what the remoaners want people to believe, so push this message themselves?