Could UK U-turn on Referendum Result (Vol 2)
Discussion
FiF said:
B'stard Child said:
Einion Yrth said:
B'stard Child said:
don'tbesilly said:
But we are leaving that........ Aren't we?
king competitionFiF said:
Eurovision song contest wasn't even on the radar regarding my decision, and still isn't. Plus as above we can't get any worse than recent results. In a way I hope they do behave like that, just show themselves up for the set of clowns they are. Well rid of the mardy gits.
I did my research 
I had 273 reasons to leave and 11 to stay and one of the 273 was Eurovision
Greg66 said:
This 7-4 split suggestion is interesting. Having watched the hearing with one eye, it seemed to me that Reed and Carnwath (the unintelligible old bloke on the right who kept coming at things from a different angle to everyone else) were persuaded by the Govt argument. Hughes and Hodge (very far right and very far left) were harder to call; I'm not sure that they had made their minds up by the end of it. The middle block of 7 seemed fairly well settled against the Govt, with Sumption (the man with the wild ties) regarding the whole thing as incredibly simple and a complete waste of his and everyone else's time.
I'd say anywhere from 7-4 to 11-0 is possible. Minds can change and be changed during the deliberation process.
Don't think it will be closer than 7-4 though.
I'm booking that as a balls on accurate prediction of the outcome. I'd say anywhere from 7-4 to 11-0 is possible. Minds can change and be changed during the deliberation process.
Don't think it will be closer than 7-4 though.
Now, the lottery numbers. Hmm...
Greg66 said:
Greg66 said:
This 7-4 split suggestion is interesting. Having watched the hearing with one eye, it seemed to me that Reed and Carnwath (the unintelligible old bloke on the right who kept coming at things from a different angle to everyone else) were persuaded by the Govt argument. Hughes and Hodge (very far right and very far left) were harder to call; I'm not sure that they had made their minds up by the end of it. The middle block of 7 seemed fairly well settled against the Govt, with Sumption (the man with the wild ties) regarding the whole thing as incredibly simple and a complete waste of his and everyone else's time.
I'd say anywhere from 7-4 to 11-0 is possible. Minds can change and be changed during the deliberation process.
Don't think it will be closer than 7-4 though.
I'm booking that as a balls on accurate prediction of the outcome. I'd say anywhere from 7-4 to 11-0 is possible. Minds can change and be changed during the deliberation process.
Don't think it will be closer than 7-4 though.
Now, the lottery numbers. Hmm...
Zod said:
Greg66 said:
Greg66 said:
This 7-4 split suggestion is interesting. Having watched the hearing with one eye, it seemed to me that Reed and Carnwath (the unintelligible old bloke on the right who kept coming at things from a different angle to everyone else) were persuaded by the Govt argument. Hughes and Hodge (very far right and very far left) were harder to call; I'm not sure that they had made their minds up by the end of it. The middle block of 7 seemed fairly well settled against the Govt, with Sumption (the man with the wild ties) regarding the whole thing as incredibly simple and a complete waste of his and everyone else's time.
I'd say anywhere from 7-4 to 11-0 is possible. Minds can change and be changed during the deliberation process.
Don't think it will be closer than 7-4 though.
I'm booking that as a balls on accurate prediction of the outcome. I'd say anywhere from 7-4 to 11-0 is possible. Minds can change and be changed during the deliberation process.
Don't think it will be closer than 7-4 though.
Now, the lottery numbers. Hmm...
The result was within the range; I picked two of the three dissenters (reed and Carnwath) and fingered Hughes (dissenter) and Hodge (majority) as either way.
I think I deserve a MASSIVE congrats for that.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-politics-3872326...
Well thats that. Fairly obvious I thought due to the original high court ruling but doesnt really change much I dont think because parliament will surely vote it through no matter what.
Well thats that. Fairly obvious I thought due to the original high court ruling but doesnt really change much I dont think because parliament will surely vote it through no matter what.
p1stonhead said:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-politics-3872326...
Well thats that. Fairly obvious I thought but doesnt really change much I dont think because parliament will surely vote it through no matter what.
As a alternative view I think that Parliament and the Lords will vote it through - I don't think it will be smooth sailing but it will be voted throughWell thats that. Fairly obvious I thought but doesnt really change much I dont think because parliament will surely vote it through no matter what.
Greg66 said:
Zod said:
Greg66 said:
Greg66 said:
This 7-4 split suggestion is interesting. Having watched the hearing with one eye, it seemed to me that Reed and Carnwath (the unintelligible old bloke on the right who kept coming at things from a different angle to everyone else) were persuaded by the Govt argument. Hughes and Hodge (very far right and very far left) were harder to call; I'm not sure that they had made their minds up by the end of it. The middle block of 7 seemed fairly well settled against the Govt, with Sumption (the man with the wild ties) regarding the whole thing as incredibly simple and a complete waste of his and everyone else's time.
I'd say anywhere from 7-4 to 11-0 is possible. Minds can change and be changed during the deliberation process.
Don't think it will be closer than 7-4 though.
I'm booking that as a balls on accurate prediction of the outcome. I'd say anywhere from 7-4 to 11-0 is possible. Minds can change and be changed during the deliberation process.
Don't think it will be closer than 7-4 though.
Now, the lottery numbers. Hmm...
The result was within the range; I picked two of the three dissenters (reed and Carnwath) and fingered Hughes (dissenter) and Hodge (majority) as either way.
I think I deserve a MASSIVE congrats for that.
Tough ref here.
B'stard Child said:
p1stonhead said:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-politics-3872326...
Well thats that. Fairly obvious I thought but doesnt really change much I dont think because parliament will surely vote it through no matter what.
As a alternative view I think that Parliament and the Lords will vote it through - I don't think it will be smooth sailing but it will be voted throughWell thats that. Fairly obvious I thought but doesnt really change much I dont think because parliament will surely vote it through no matter what.
Whilst it will ultimately go through, if everyone gets their say on the plan before its triggered, there is no way this is going to happen by March IMO.
Edited by p1stonhead on Tuesday 24th January 11:20
0000 said:
Juncker said:
Trump spoke to Mr. Tusk and mixed us up ... that's the thing about international politics, it's all in the detail.
Yeah. The mess that is the EU organisation structure is Trump's problem, not yours. Tool.Dr Jekyll said:
He's just pissed that Trump is speaking to May before him...WinstonWolf said:
Dr Jekyll said:
He's just pissed that Trump is speaking to May before him...Amusingly enough, it now appears to be the hapless Mr Junker at the back of the queue.
johnxjsc1985 said:
WinstonWolf said:
He's just pissed that Trump is speaking to May before him...
you had me at just pissed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPgiI46FCDU
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff