Prince Harry's new squeeze...
Discussion
Too Drunk to Funk said:
That may be the official line. Doesn't mean it's true.
Perhaps it's just an incredible coincidence that Diana had a 5 year affair with someone who just happened to be the spit of Harry.
Who knows.
You mean the Royal Family have invented time travel and are covering it up?Perhaps it's just an incredible coincidence that Diana had a 5 year affair with someone who just happened to be the spit of Harry.
Who knows.
Too Drunk to Funk said:
How many brothers do you know where one has lost their hair and the other hasn't?
I am a slap head, my brother is not. We have the same nose, mouth, general build, height, shoe size, jaw line etc.edit due to a touchy legal assistant moaning about an error on a multiple quote:
Edited by The Dangerous Elk on Saturday 2nd December 13:04
Breadvan72 said:
Genes and stuff: I once saw that Prince Michael of Kent bloke at an opera. Blimey, it was like bumping into Tsar Nicholas II. He didn't just look like Nicholas II, he was Nicholas II. Similarly I once lived next door to William Gladstone's great or maybe great great grandson or great great nephew or whatever. He didn't look like Gladstone, he was him.
Once at the Farnborough airshow Prince Michael blagged a look round a Russian aircraft, the crew were a bit bemused to see a dead ringer for Tsar Nicholas turn up and start chatting to them in Russian.Too Drunk to Funk said:
Breadvan72 said:
The Hewitt theory is great fun, but the dates don't stack up. Harry is Chazzer's.
That may be the official line. Doesn't mean it's true.Perhaps it's just an incredible coincidence that Diana had a 5 year affair with someone who just happened to be the spit of Harry.
Who knows.
Dr Jekyll said:
Breadvan72 said:
Genes and stuff: I once saw that Prince Michael of Kent bloke at an opera. Blimey, it was like bumping into Tsar Nicholas II. He didn't just look like Nicholas II, he was Nicholas II. Similarly I once lived next door to William Gladstone's great or maybe great great grandson or great great nephew or whatever. He didn't look like Gladstone, he was him.
Once at the Farnborough airshow Prince Michael blagged a look round a Russian aircraft, the crew were a bit bemused to see a dead ringer for Tsar Nicholas turn up and start chatting to them in Russian.baldy1926 said:
Did read somewhere about one of Prince Michael's Russian trips. Apparently he was at a theatre in the backend of Russia. They popped the spotlight on him as the guest of honour there was apparently an audible gasp from the older audience members due to his resemblance to the Tsar
They must have been pretty old.Thankyou4calling said:
Shakermaker said:
Rolling coverage on the BBC website about their first event together.
Why does the BBC, and I am sure others, believe that anyone gives a damn what Meghan Markle is wearing, to the degree that the headline on the update is "Meghan opts for blue coat for first royal engagement."
Nobody cares! And yet every single time a famous woman is photographed, there seems to be some need for the journalist to reference their outfit.
There are several photographs with this story of them attending to their business, it is quite clear that she is wearing a blue coat. Yes, I am sure she made a conscious decision to wear that coat but I am sure it had more to do with the weather and the fact that she owns a blue coat which generally looks OK with most other outfits.
Nobody cares! Blimey that's about as far removed from reality as you can get.Why does the BBC, and I am sure others, believe that anyone gives a damn what Meghan Markle is wearing, to the degree that the headline on the update is "Meghan opts for blue coat for first royal engagement."
Nobody cares! And yet every single time a famous woman is photographed, there seems to be some need for the journalist to reference their outfit.
There are several photographs with this story of them attending to their business, it is quite clear that she is wearing a blue coat. Yes, I am sure she made a conscious decision to wear that coat but I am sure it had more to do with the weather and the fact that she owns a blue coat which generally looks OK with most other outfits.
People do care, MASSIVELY.
Take the example of Meghans bag and coat. It can take years and millions to build a brand yet in a single picture, that bag has become the hottest property you can buy, except you can't buy it!
Forget Prada, Vuitton, Hermes Meghan carried a Strathberry and people will go crazy for it.
Trust me on that.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/fabulous/5045515/meghan-m...
Oakey said:
My girlfriends grandfather is bald, she has two uncles one of which is bald and the other isn't. The bald one has two sons, one bald, one not.
Also, Prince Andrew isn't bald as Charles and Harry is balding.
Maternal grandfather?Also, Prince Andrew isn't bald as Charles and Harry is balding.
Edited by Oakey on Saturday 2nd December 12:21
The Spruce goose said:
And just to prove genetics is a very interesting thing in relation to offspring traits, these are same dad, same mum, twins.
That's the mum's story and she's sticki8ng to it!TwigtheWonderkid said:
There are scores of witnesses who were present when they we first introduced. Literally scores. They can all attest to the fact that they had never met before. This was in the summer shortly before Harry's 2nd birthday in September.
Eh? So if two people claim that it's the first time they've met, provided there are lots of people there that somehow makes it true? Yipper said:
Di banged 10 to 20 posh blokes in her Charley years, from the army to rugby to surgeons. She was filthy totty. Harry's real dad could be any one from several folks.
Oh dear god. This thread is like some kind of parallel universe! 
You know this to be true because... some bloke dahn the pub told you?
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff