The economic consequences of Brexit (Vol 2)

The economic consequences of Brexit (Vol 2)

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

Tuna

19,930 posts

284 months

Saturday 25th November 2017
quotequote all
///ajd said:
It is still surprising to see how some brexiteers don’t seem to realise that tariffs are a barrier to incoming exports, applied deliberately to protect domestic interests.

Hence when we face barriers externally, it affects exports.

Do these brexiteers realise that our exporters need tariff free trade into foriegn countries and notably the EU?
How many times do we have to explain protectionism to you? Personally I think the domestic coffee growers of the UK would be better served by subsidies than making every coffee drinker in the UK pay extra for their morning drink.

The whole point of lowering tariffs is that we don't want to get into a war of protectionism and ever rising barriers to trade.

Why on earth do you think that only Remainers have the deep insight that we want to trade as freely as possible with foreign countries, including the EU?


PurpleMoonlight

22,362 posts

157 months

Saturday 25th November 2017
quotequote all
sidicks said:
Where do you want your parrot sent?
What, no prize?

biggrin

sidicks

25,218 posts

221 months

Saturday 25th November 2017
quotequote all
PurpleMoonlight said:
What, no prize?

biggrin
Sorry, I'm out of prizes!

///ajd

8,964 posts

206 months

Saturday 25th November 2017
quotequote all
sidicks said:
///ajd said:
Total EU export trade is 1.8Bn. About 300m to UK, or 16%

Exports to the UK from the EU are dropping, just as ours are to the EU, due to growing external markets.
So why would we constrain our ability to trade with non-EU countries on the terms we need?

You previously claimed:
///adj said:
Do these brexiteers realise that our exporters need tariff free trade into foreign countries and notably the EU?
What is currently stopping us negotiating 'tariff free trade into non-EU countries"?
The issue I am referring to is the importance of EU trade to us - and hence the need for continued tariff/barrier free EU trade. I.e. no hard Brexit nonsense. Stay in CU for Eire alone.

RoW trade is a secondary issue to improve - note we are still exporting loads whilst in the EU to RoW, and now that Liam Fox has said our businesses are are lazy and not going to export more to RoW even if he gets new deals - so that’s a busted myth from his own mouth.

Some don’t seem to recognise how important tariff / barrier free trade into the EU is for the UK.

Edited by ///ajd on Saturday 25th November 13:32


Edited by ///ajd on Saturday 25th November 13:34

PurpleMoonlight

22,362 posts

157 months

Saturday 25th November 2017
quotequote all
Tuna said:
How many times do we have to explain protectionism to you? Personally I think the domestic coffee growers of the UK would be better served by subsidies than making every coffee drinker in the UK pay extra for their morning drink.

The whole point of lowering tariffs is that we don't want to get into a war of protectionism and ever rising barriers to trade.

Why on earth do you think that only Remainers have the deep insight that we want to trade as freely as possible with foreign countries, including the EU?
Aren't internal subsidies against WTO rules though?

I've asked it many times, if free trade what such a utopia why isn't everybody doing it?

///ajd

8,964 posts

206 months

Saturday 25th November 2017
quotequote all
Tuna said:
///ajd said:
It is still surprising to see how some brexiteers don’t seem to realise that tariffs are a barrier to incoming exports, applied deliberately to protect domestic interests.

Hence when we face barriers externally, it affects exports.

Do these brexiteers realise that our exporters need tariff free trade into foriegn countries and notably the EU?
How many times do we have to explain protectionism to you? Personally I think the domestic coffee growers of the UK would be better served by subsidies than making every coffee drinker in the UK pay extra for their morning drink.

The whole point of lowering tariffs is that we don't want to get into a war of protectionism and ever rising barriers to trade.

Why on earth do you think that only Remainers have the deep insight that we want to trade as freely as possible with foreign countries, including the EU?
Is it important for our exporters to have tariff free access into the EU?

Yes or No?

sidicks

25,218 posts

221 months

Saturday 25th November 2017
quotequote all
PurpleMoonlight said:
Aren't internal subsidies against WTO rules though?

I've asked it many times, if free trade what such a utopia why isn't everybody doing it?
If freedom of movement is such a utopia, why isn't everyone doing it?

Edited by sidicks on Saturday 25th November 13:31

sidicks

25,218 posts

221 months

Saturday 25th November 2017
quotequote all
///ajd said:
Is it important for our exporters to have tariff free access into the EU?

Yes or No?
Is it important for our exporters to have tariff free access into non-EU countries?

Yes or No?

PurpleMoonlight

22,362 posts

157 months

Saturday 25th November 2017
quotequote all
sidicks said:
If freedom of movement is such a utopia, why isn't everyone doing it?

Edited by sidicks on Saturday 25th November 13:31
Have I said it is?

anonymous-user

54 months

Saturday 25th November 2017
quotequote all
Tuna said:
It seems hard to grasp, but tariffs hurt the country that applies them,

<snip>
which is why the WTO seeks to limit them rather than encourage them.
Been out. Was going to say that the first statement is obviously not right - see the second (and Trump's tariffs on Bombardier). But others have done it already.

paulrockliffe

15,705 posts

227 months

Saturday 25th November 2017
quotequote all
///ajd said:
Total EU export trade is 1.8Trn. About 300bn to UK, or 16%

Exports to the UK from the EU are dropping, just as ours are to the EU, due to growing external markets. So it’s not as if Europe are shrinking as swivel eyed loons would have some believe. Their GDP is growing faster than us now, since Brexit remember.

Our exports to the EU are 44%

So it’s 44% of our exports
Versus 16% of theirs.

Who has the bigger stake in getting a deal?

Take your time.

Edited by ///ajd on Saturday 25th November 13:18
I think if you want to do this properly you need to express your percentages in terms of the whole market, not just exports. You also need to consider the make up of imports, because not all of it is harmful if it is diminished. Eg if people have to buy Jaguars instead of BMW then that's actually very good for the UK, because theres no economic cost to people having to compromise.

No idea what the numbers look like, but you're not presenting the whole story.

sidicks

25,218 posts

221 months

Saturday 25th November 2017
quotequote all
PurpleMoonlight said:
sidicks said:
If freedom of movement is such a utopia, why isn't everyone doing it?
Have I said it is?
Fair enough.

PurpleMoonlight

22,362 posts

157 months

Saturday 25th November 2017
quotequote all
sidicks said:
///ajd said:
Is it important for our exporters to have tariff free access into the EU?

Yes or No?
Is it important for our exporters to have tariff free access into non-EU countries?

Yes or No?
The difference is tariff free access to the EU is guaranteed if we are in the EU.

Tariff free access to RoW is not guaranteed if we leave the EU.

///ajd

8,964 posts

206 months

Saturday 25th November 2017
quotequote all
paulrockliffe said:
I think if you want to do this properly you need to express your percentages in terms of the whole market, not just exports. You also need to consider the make up of imports, because not all of it is harmful if it is diminished. Eg if people have to buy Jaguars instead of BMW then that's actually very good for the UK, because theres no economic cost to people having to compromise.

No idea what the numbers look like, but you're not presenting the whole story.
So you have no idea why the numbers are wrong, but they don’t present the whole story.

Interesting, I’m seeing a pattern.

How is total EU export / EU export to UK as a %, and comparing that to total UK export / UK export to EU as % not exactly what should be compared?

It seems to be wrong in your mind as it undermines the argument that the EU need us more than we need them. Sorry to bring facts to the table.

Edited by ///ajd on Saturday 25th November 13:46

sidicks

25,218 posts

221 months

Saturday 25th November 2017
quotequote all
///ajd said:
So you,be no idea why the numbers are wrong, but they don’t present the whole story.

Interesting, I’m seeing a pattern.

How is total EU export / EU export to UK as a %, and comparing that to total UK export / UK export to EU as % not exactly what should be compared?

It seems to be wrong in your mind as it undermines the argument that the EU need us more than we need them. Sorry to bring facts to the table.
Who is making this argument?

Eddie Strohacker

3,879 posts

86 months

Saturday 25th November 2017
quotequote all
That's a first, a PH'er arguing for less choice in cars.

PurpleMoonlight

22,362 posts

157 months

Saturday 25th November 2017
quotequote all
///ajd said:
So you,be no idea why the numbers are wrong, but they don’t present the whole story.

Interesting, I’m seeing a pattern.

How is total EU export / EU export to UK as a %, and comparing that to total UK export / UK export to EU as % not exactly what should be compared?

It seems to be wrong in your mind as it undermines the argument that the EU need us more than we need them. Sorry to bring facts to the table.
Ideally the value of exports should be compared to GDP I would think.


sidicks

25,218 posts

221 months

Saturday 25th November 2017
quotequote all
Eddie Strohacker said:
That's a first, a PH'er arguing for less choice in cars.
Same choice, differing price.

Tuna

19,930 posts

284 months

Saturday 25th November 2017
quotequote all
Greg66 said:
Tuna said:
It seems hard to grasp, but tariffs hurt the country that applies them,

<snip>
which is why the WTO seeks to limit them rather than encourage them.
Been out. Was going to say that the first statement is obviously not right - see the second (and Trump's tariffs on Bombardier). But others have done it already.
Ok, simple example... someone, somewhere in the world makes phones cheaper than we can afford to. What do we do?

a) Add no tariff - and benefit from a good we can get cheaply elsewhere

b) Add enough of a tariff that we can have a 'competitive' local market in phone manufacture

Tariffs hurt us. They might slightly reduce the number of foreign phones (cars, chocolate, whatever) we choose to buy, but we're just one export market to those producers (as the Remain crew keep reminding us) - so why should they care if we turn phones into 'luxury goods'? They can still sell to everyone else and watch the UK go back to tin cans and string.

And it you think that tariffs improve trade, try reading this

https://tradebetablog.wordpress.com/2016/08/18/eu-...

or this:

http://www.tuaeu.co.uk/how-the-eu-starves-africa/



Tuna

19,930 posts

284 months

Saturday 25th November 2017
quotequote all
PurpleMoonlight said:
I've asked it many times, if free trade what such a utopia why isn't everybody doing it?
Mainly because lobby groups and hand wringing apologists fight to 'protect' internal markets.

There are of course strategic and nostalgic reasons to preserve certain industries, but the focus should be on supporting them directly rather than indirectly hurting every last consumer in the name of protectionism.

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED