The economic consequences of Brexit (Vol 2)

[Murph7355]

mx5nut said:

...

All Leavers may not be thick, but the ones who tend to speak out in public tend to be

And commentary like that makes you sound erudite?

Pillock.

[jjlynn27]

KrissKross said:

jjlynn27 said:

I was asking for the country as a whole. Thanks.

You don't speak for the country, not sure who you speak for really as its always so negative!

How did I miss this pearl?

KrissKross said:

You seem to want to support the 5% of people, such as in large corporations and politicians that benefit from being part of the EU protectionist racket, furthering their bent career paths. Why is this?

Where did you get 5% from?

This is going to be good.

[KrissKross]

jjlynn27 said:

Where did you get 5% from?

I made it up but clearly not the point as you well know.

[Jockman]

Murph7355 said:

mx5nut said:

...

All Leavers may not be thick, but the ones who tend to speak out in public tend to be

And commentary like that makes you sound erudite?

Pillock.

Aaaaannnddd............relax

[anonymous-user]

£ broke through the 1.40:1 barrier against the $ today.

Britain recorded its smallest budget deficit for any December in 17 years as value-added tax receipts reached a record.

VAT rose 4.9 percent from a year earlier to an all-time high of 12.3 billion pounds.

[CaptainSlow]

jsf said:

£ broke through the 1.40:1 barrier against the $ today.

Britain recorded its smallest budget deficit for any December in 17 years as value-added tax receipts reached a record.

VAT rose 4.9 percent from a year earlier to an all-time high of 12.3 billion pounds.

If Brexit did "immediate" and "profound" recessions they would be the best "immediate" and "profound" recessions in the world.

[anonymous-user]

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-01-23...

[CaptainSlow]

Ghibli said:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-01-23...

Firstly, are we now allowed to look at Forbes as JJ rubbished it last time we did.

Secondly, what are you highlighting in regards to the lowest December deficit for 17 years?

[jjlynn27]

CaptainSlow said:

Ghibli said:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-01-23...

Firstly, are we now allowed to look at Forbes as JJ rubbished it last time we did.

Forbes? It's Bloomberg. You realize that they are not the same?

Firstly, 'rubbishing' a post highlighting a list which was the result of a changed methodology is not equal to "rubbishing Forbes'. Given that it's you, totally unsurprising that you can't see the difference.

CaptainSoPainflullySlow said:

Secondly, what are you highlighting in regards to the lowest December deficit for 17 years?

Awesome.

Did you even read the article past the headline?

[CaptainSlow]

jjlynn27 said:

CaptainSlow said:

Ghibli said:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-01-23...

Firstly, are we now allowed to look at Forbes as JJ rubbished it last time we did.

Forbes? It's Bloomberg. You realize that they are not the same?

Firstly, 'rubbishing' a post highlighting a list which was the result of a changed methodology is not equal to "rubbishing Forbes'. Given that it's you, totally unsurprising that you can't see the difference.

CaptainSoPainflullySlow said:

Secondly, what are you highlighting in regards to the lowest December deficit for 17 years?

Awesome.

Did you even read the article past the headline?

I did, I couln't find the bit about the UK being in recession or an emergency budget....what are we supposed to be looking at?

btw will you still be on here when you get some daylight? Your SAD is getting a little worrying now.

[jjlynn27]

CaptainSlow said:

I did, I couln't find the bit about the UK being in recession or an emergency budget....what are we supposed to be looking at?

btw will you still be on here when you get some daylight? Your SAD is getting a little worrying now.

Baby steps.

Forbes;


Not Forbes;

[CaptainSlow]

No answer then, no surprises there from you.

[jjlynn27]

CaptainSlow said:

No answer then, no surprises there from you.

All in good time. But first things first, do you understand that there is a difference between Forbes and Bloomberg?

[anonymous-user]

CaptainSlow said:

I did, I couln't find the bit about the UK being in recession or an emergency budget....what are we supposed to be looking at?

Ok, you couldn't find what you were looking for and you didn't know what you were looking for.

I posted a link to what jsf was talking about, nothing more nothing less.

[CaptainSlow]

Ghibli said:

CaptainSlow said:

I did, I couln't find the bit about the UK being in recession or an emergency budget....what are we supposed to be looking at?

Ok, you couldn't find what you were looking for and you didn't know what you were looking for.

I posted a link to what jsf was talking about, nothing more nothing less.

ok fair enough.

[Tuna]

Nothing constructive to say, jj?

[jjlynn27]

Tuna said:

Nothing constructive to say, jj?

LOL.

You, the bloke who went trawling through pages and pages, counting perceived insults, in order to prove that 'his side' is less insulting, you are asking me that?

Thanks for that, really.

It seems that rather slow 'captain' is struggling with the difference between, wait for it, different publications, as well as with what I actually said. Don't you think it's rather nice, let alone charitable, of me to spend some time, and help out?

[CaptainSlow]

You are a complete pillock.

Your SADness has got worse as the winter has progressed.

Can you actually add anything to the debate without resorting to petty insults? Don't bother answering as I'll leave you to your own self-loathing.

[CaptainSlow]

Anyhow of brighter news...

UK unemployment at a four decade low....this "immediate" and "profound" recession is really starting to bite!!!!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-42802526

FMOL still causing wage deflation though, so working UK families still suffering for the time being.

[anonymous-user]

£ currently 1.4192 to the $, up 1.44% so far today

Edited by anonymous-user on Wednesday 24th January 13:35