The economic consequences of Brexit (Vol 2)

The economic consequences of Brexit (Vol 2)

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

jjlynn27

7,935 posts

109 months

Thursday 25th January 2018
quotequote all
PRTVR said:
500 new jobs for Newcastle, pharmaceutical company starts up.
https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/business/business-...
MD was saying that it matters not whether the UK is in the EU or not as they already sell into the EU from around the world.
Awesome.

It would be even better if it wasn't recycled from two years ago.

Eta: link

https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/business/business-...


Edited by jjlynn27 on Thursday 25th January 19:13

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 25th January 2018
quotequote all
Eddie Strohacker said:
Hammond called for the UK to move only modestly from the EU & No.10 refused to contradict him, according to a few pol eds. It's a soft Brexit as many of us observing the juggernaut of right wingery running into the brick wall of reality have been predicting. Sorry not sorry lads. smile
We’re atill leaving the EU though. You sound like you’ve at last accepted that........

Eddie Strohacker

3,879 posts

86 months

Thursday 25th January 2018
quotequote all
REALIST123 said:
We’re atill leaving the EU though. You sound like you’ve at last accepted that........
I'm guessing you wish to imply I've hitherto been unable to accept the outcome of the referendum as distinct from voicing my opposition to leaving as I have been doing at length for many months now, which frankly, makes a mockery of your user name.

Sway

26,277 posts

194 months

Thursday 25th January 2018
quotequote all
Randy Winkman said:
And have to comply with EU regulations anyway.
Only for those goods sold to the EU, not the entirety of production. That's a big difference.


PRTVR

7,108 posts

221 months

Thursday 25th January 2018
quotequote all
jjlynn27 said:
PRTVR said:
500 new jobs for Newcastle, pharmaceutical company starts up.
https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/business/business-...
MD was saying that it matters not whether the UK is in the EU or not as they already sell into the EU from around the world.
Awesome.

It would be even better if it wasn't recycled from two years ago.

Eta: link

https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/business/business-...


Edited by jjlynn27 on Thursday 25th January 19:13
They officially open the factory today, on the local news they were talking about 500 jobs that were not dependent on any trade agreement, even though they will sell into the EU.
Do you not find that relevant ?

dromong

689 posts

220 months

Thursday 25th January 2018
quotequote all
Eddie Strohacker said:
I'm voicing my opposition to leaving as I have been doing at length for many months now.
An extreme case of "unimaginatively ploughing the same furrow" as ever I heard rofl .



Eddie Strohacker

3,879 posts

86 months

Thursday 25th January 2018
quotequote all
dro said:
An extreme case of "unimaginatively ploughing the same furrow" as ever I heard rofl .
Not as Teflon as you'd have us believe then. laugh

mx5nut

5,404 posts

82 months

Friday 26th January 2018
quotequote all
Eddie Strohacker said:
Hammond called for the UK to move only modestly from the EU & No.10 refused to contradict him, according to a few pol eds. It's a soft Brexit as many of us observing the juggernaut of right wingery running into the brick wall of reality have been predicting. Sorry not sorry lads. smile
Great news that ministers are becoming less cautious about saying this kind of thing publicly smile

Tuna

19,930 posts

284 months

Friday 26th January 2018
quotequote all
mx5nut said:
Eddie Strohacker said:
Hammond called for the UK to move only modestly from the EU & No.10 refused to contradict him, according to a few pol eds. It's a soft Brexit as many of us observing the juggernaut of right wingery running into the brick wall of reality have been predicting. Sorry not sorry lads. smile
Great news that ministers are becoming less cautious about saying this kind of thing publicly smile
Ignoring the ministers falacy, are you guys not at all concerned that Hammond's idea of a super-soft brexit will do the UK more damage than just about any other option?

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 26th January 2018
quotequote all
Tuna said:
mx5nut said:
Eddie Strohacker said:
Hammond called for the UK to move only modestly from the EU & No.10 refused to contradict him, according to a few pol eds. It's a soft Brexit as many of us observing the juggernaut of right wingery running into the brick wall of reality have been predicting. Sorry not sorry lads. smile
Great news that ministers are becoming less cautious about saying this kind of thing publicly smile
Ignoring the ministers falacy, are you guys not at all concerned that Hammond's idea of a super-soft brexit will do the UK more damage than just about any other option?
Hammond got a slap down after that. He does seem to be pushing an agenda not aligned with May at times.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-01-25...

PurpleMoonlight

22,362 posts

157 months

Friday 26th January 2018
quotequote all
Tuna said:
Ignoring the ministers falacy, are you guys not at all concerned that Hammond's idea of a super-soft brexit will do the UK more damage than just about any other option?
Seriously?

Sway

26,277 posts

194 months

Friday 26th January 2018
quotequote all
PurpleMoonlight said:
Tuna said:
Ignoring the ministers falacy, are you guys not at all concerned that Hammond's idea of a super-soft brexit will do the UK more damage than just about any other option?
Seriously?
Not speaking for Tuna, but I distinctly recall a very high percentage of remain supporters prior to the Ref considered what's now called a 'soft brexit', or the Flexcit approach as being the 'worst of all worlds, no freedom to operate and having to follow rules with zero say'.

Funny how that's now changed after the Ref...

PurpleMoonlight

22,362 posts

157 months

Friday 26th January 2018
quotequote all
Sway said:
Not speaking for Tuna, but I distinctly recall a very high percentage of remain supporters prior to the Ref considered what's now called a 'soft brexit', or the Flexcit approach as being the 'worst of all worlds, no freedom to operate and having to follow rules with zero say'.

Funny how that's now changed after the Ref...
Can't say I recall that. But it seems May is intent on leaving everything with just a trade agreement so no worries.

Sway

26,277 posts

194 months

Friday 26th January 2018
quotequote all
PurpleMoonlight said:
Sway said:
Not speaking for Tuna, but I distinctly recall a very high percentage of remain supporters prior to the Ref considered what's now called a 'soft brexit', or the Flexcit approach as being the 'worst of all worlds, no freedom to operate and having to follow rules with zero say'.

Funny how that's now changed after the Ref...
Can't say I recall that. But it seems May is intent on leaving everything with just a trade agreement so no worries.
There was months of repetitive debate on the desired outcome in the run up to the ref. It certainly couldn't be said that this forum at least didn't consider what 'type' of brexit was desired by leave supporters - as per Blair/Clegg etc. now as their justification of a 'check vote'.

Anyone who supported flexcit (and my thanks to FiF, who sadly has given up posting on these threads) was criticised for wanting a transition that would mean we were effectively Norway for a few years.

On your last sentence, completely agree. Perfect aim for me, and what I've been proposing for the last two years at least. Further, the predictions i made in the first pages of the 'how will negotiatons go' thread have all come true so far...

Randy Winkman

16,137 posts

189 months

Friday 26th January 2018
quotequote all
Sway said:
Randy Winkman said:
And have to comply with EU regulations anyway.
Only for those goods sold to the EU, not the entirety of production. That's a big difference.
Even once we have left the EU, I hope that (in the UK) I can still chose to have pharmaceuticals that do meet EU regulations. Will there be any that don't anyway? What would be the point?

Sway

26,277 posts

194 months

Friday 26th January 2018
quotequote all
Randy Winkman said:
Sway said:
Randy Winkman said:
And have to comply with EU regulations anyway.
Only for those goods sold to the EU, not the entirety of production. That's a big difference.
Even once we have left the EU, I hope that (in the UK) I can still chose to have pharmaceuticals that do meet EU regulations. Will there be any that don't anyway? What would be the point?
You can have different standards, that broadly meet the same level of safety, etc.

EU regs aren't the be all and end all, as far as I'm aware it's the only regime with 'maximum' standards, as well as 'minimum' ones...

paul789

3,682 posts

104 months

Friday 26th January 2018
quotequote all
Digga said:
sidicks said:
paul789 said:
Hmm, 991.1 for the howl (have driven), 991.2 getting rave reviews, newer and the price differential is narrow. Decisions, decisions....
Obviously it depends on budget and use, but i’d Go NA 991 / 997 for semi-regular use.
I've driven 991.1 and 991.2 GTS, both very good. Just have an extended drive to check whether or not the sports seats suit you. (They don't agree with my bionic shoulder.)
Good shout - most with have the 4, 14 or 18 way rather than buckets but, aside from being a trainee fat lad, I should be ok. Worth checking though.

Big Al.

Original Poster:

68,864 posts

258 months

Friday 26th January 2018
quotequote all
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED