Can PH solve the missing Honington airman?

Can PH solve the missing Honington airman?

Author
Discussion

crankedup

25,764 posts

243 months

Thursday 9th March 2017
quotequote all
FunkyNige said:
j80jpw said:
How do they now know the bin weight was 100kg not 11?
I'm *guessing* they phoned the company that ran the bin lorries straight away and asked about the possibilty of the airman being in it, someone said it was only 11kg so the police ruled that out. At a later date the police decided to double check things, phoned up again, someone else looked up the weight on the records and said it was over 100kg, first guy got arrested for perverting the course of justice.

As I say that's a complete guess but sounds reasonable in my head...
Exactly.
Why the hell it took them 5 months to double check is the question.

sugerbear

4,034 posts

158 months

Thursday 9th March 2017
quotequote all
R8Steve said:
sugerbear said:
R8Steve said:
Surely one of the other CCTV cameras would have captured him regardless what way he went, if you look at the diagram of the area there's not really a way to get out without being seen on one of them.

Presumably the police checked these seen as they discounted the bin lorry, then again...
Why should there be a CCTV? It isn't mandatory. There isn't a CCTV camera that looks directly into the horseshoe, just along the street.

Have a look at the pictures here http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-suffolk-39218... the ones further down show the bin and the horseshoe, it isn't a locked box mystery, you can go through doors or over walls/roofs to get out if you were fit enough. Maybe a blackhawk helicopter picked him up, maybe he uncovered a drain cover and went for a walk through the sewers of Bury St Edmunds, maybe he entered a property, locked himself in a cupboard and choked/had a heart attack.

You can see the horseshoe on streetview, loads of ways out that dont involve walking back the way he came (the properties that back onto the horseshoe were also searched in case he has entered one of those).
I never said it was mandatory to have CCTV.

You say maybe he entered a property and locked himself in a cupboard, how long does it take to search the surrounding buildings? A day max?

He was seen entering where the bins are. He was not seen on any other CCTV in the area of which i have no doubt there are hundreds. A bin lorry entered and left taking his phone with it.

It has taken 6 months for common sense to prevail and work out that most likely he is at the landfill site.

6 months it has taken to come to this conclusion. Regardless what way you look at it that is a bit of a joke.
All said with the benefit of hindsight..

Say he there his phone into the bin with the intention of going awol, entered a building and went out the other side and then was picked up and and moved out of the country/country, the police will have just wasted x number of days searching a landfill site when he is on the other side of the country / world !!

There were still cars and people un-identified around the time of his disappearance.

I guess you will be applying to the CID so they can benefit from your awesome detective skills.

AWG

855 posts

156 months

Thursday 9th March 2017
quotequote all
Just read this from the beginning and some interesting comments raised.

Has the RAF contributed much time and effort to the safe return of one of their own or made any statements?

768

13,681 posts

96 months

Thursday 9th March 2017
quotequote all
crankedup said:
Exactly.
Why the hell it took them 5 months to double check is the question.
Reading this thread I'm guessing arrogance.

saaby93

Original Poster:

32,038 posts

178 months

Thursday 9th March 2017
quotequote all
AWG said:
Just read this from the beginning and some interesting comments raised.

Has the RAF contributed much time and effort to the safe return of one of their own or made any statements?
Thats been one of the other great mysteries. Youd have thought they'd have been scouring the planet trying find a missing officer

Unless something is going on or known about which isnt being made public

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 9th March 2017
quotequote all
The police search centre (where the module on 'arrogance for fun' - because it's loads of fun to prolong an enquiry - is taught) is coordinated with the military, but it's not their job.

Jakg

3,463 posts

168 months

Thursday 9th March 2017
quotequote all
saaby93 said:
Unless something is going on or known about which isnt being made public
I think this would be a good way to sum up this investigation in general.

The police have known about things for a very long time but kept quiet (e.g. the dating profile), probably for a good reason.

There is the argument that searching the waste site is best left as a last resort - the ultimate aim is to find him safe and well. Irrespective of when you started looking at the waste site, it's always going to be a body search. It could be said searching for a less likely alternative with a better outcome would be a better idea.

Muncher

12,219 posts

249 months

Thursday 9th March 2017
quotequote all
Jakg said:
I think this would be a good way to sum up this investigation in general.

The police have known about things for a very long time but kept quiet (e.g. the dating profile), probably for a good reason.

There is the argument that searching the waste site is best left as a last resort - the ultimate aim is to find him safe and well. Irrespective of when you started looking at the waste site, it's always going to be a body search. It could be said searching for a less likely alternative with a better outcome would be a better idea.
Finding the body early may be the difference between being able to establish a cause of death or never being able to establish it. If they thought a body might be there, they would search there, not spend time hoping he would be alive somewhere else.

AshBurrows

2,552 posts

162 months

Thursday 9th March 2017
quotequote all
The bin trucks have cameras in. Why not review footage?
The phone was sent to a different location to the supposed corpse. How and why?

How do the police explain these 2 things? Utterly baffling.

LaurasOtherHalf

21,429 posts

196 months

Thursday 9th March 2017
quotequote all
The entire first page of this thread is basically all about the bin lorry and the landfill sight. It really did look that simple.

For all the talk of going AWOL, or some master plan to disappear-he was a pissed up gunner who had spent part of the evening being ejected from a nightclub and passing out in a doorway.

Are we to imagine someone in this state has supposedly planned a lord lucan and avoided all CCTV whilst being paralytic?

Disastrous

10,083 posts

217 months

Thursday 9th March 2017
quotequote all
"But...but...the police know better than you and you don't understand all the info they are privy to...and...and something about hindsight even though it was foresight!!!!"

SkrrSkrr

261 posts

89 months

Thursday 9th March 2017
quotequote all
Disastrous said:
"But...but...the police know better than you and you don't understand all the info they are privy to...and...and something about hindsight even though it was foresight!!!!"
laugh

ben_h100

1,546 posts

179 months

Thursday 9th March 2017
quotequote all
saaby93 said:
AWG said:
Just read this from the beginning and some interesting comments raised.

Has the RAF contributed much time and effort to the safe return of one of their own or made any statements?
Thats been one of the other great mysteries. Youd have thought they'd have been scouring the planet trying find a missing officer

Unless something is going on or known about which isnt being made public
The RAF, in the main, are not trained to search for missing persons. It's best left to the professionals.

saaby93

Original Poster:

32,038 posts

178 months

Thursday 9th March 2017
quotequote all
ben_h100 said:
The RAF, in the main, are not trained to search for missing persons. It's best left to the professionals.
scratchchin

eccles

13,733 posts

222 months

Friday 10th March 2017
quotequote all
saaby93 said:
AWG said:
Just read this from the beginning and some interesting comments raised.

Has the RAF contributed much time and effort to the safe return of one of their own or made any statements?
Thats been one of the other great mysteries. Youd have thought they'd have been scouring the planet trying find a missing officer

Unless something is going on or known about which isnt being made public
Officer?
Has he been posthumously promoted?

LaurasOtherHalf

21,429 posts

196 months

Friday 10th March 2017
quotequote all
Disastrous said:
"But...but...the police know better than you and you don't understand all the info they are privy to...and...and something about hindsight even though it was foresight!!!!"
Ah but to be fair, I'm sure there is information not known by the public yet. Even though they're searching a landfill site it's not the one we thought it would be and most crucially, there is still no word on how exactly he happened to be there.

If the police did suspect there were persons other involved in his disappearance then who knows if they'd done the right thing?

Even though I was one of those posters on the first page suggesting this, I'll give them the benefit of the doubt until all the facts are released, never mind just finding a body.

AWG

855 posts

156 months

Friday 10th March 2017
quotequote all
ben_h100 said:
saaby93 said:
AWG said:
Just read this from the beginning and some interesting comments raised.

Has the RAF contributed much time and effort to the safe return of one of their own or made any statements?
Thats been one of the other great mysteries. Youd have thought they'd have been scouring the planet trying find a missing officer

Unless something is going on or known about which isnt being made public
The RAF, in the main, are not trained to search for missing persons. It's best left to the professionals.
To be fair, neither are the general public but looks like they have put more time into finding him! Just my weak observation.

crankedup

25,764 posts

243 months

Friday 10th March 2017
quotequote all
Jakg said:
saaby93 said:
Unless something is going on or known about which isnt being made public
I think this would be a good way to sum up this investigation in general.

The police have known about things for a very long time but kept quiet (e.g. the dating profile), probably for a good reason.

There is the argument that searching the waste site is best left as a last resort - the ultimate aim is to find him safe and well. Irrespective of when you started looking at the waste site, it's always going to be a body search. It could be said searching for a less likely alternative with a better outcome would be a better idea.
I would suggest that with the sheer number of volunteers available and willing to aid searching of areas should have been co-ordinated by the Police and maintained long term. Meanwhile Police should have searched the waste tip, the only substantially reasonable area corrie would be found.
This case highlights the very poor police work regarding this case. The lead officer needs to be interviewed and her position questioned, likely will be promoted though.

NRS

22,167 posts

201 months

Friday 10th March 2017
quotequote all
I don't know all the details of the case, but for all of those saying it was obvious and they would have searched the landfill at the start - if the BBC report is right they'd have searched the wrong one and so not found the body and it'd have been just as "wrong" as what the police did do. Assuming he is where they are looking now.

PurpleTurtle

6,987 posts

144 months

Wednesday 22nd March 2017
quotequote all
Happened across this clip via a YouTube vortex from the McCann libel thread.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=STxQ__woVlQ

Went out on TV in October 2007. 23 mins 30 secs in, ex-British coppers talking about bodies being left in wheelie bins, with an absolute need to secure any bins and landfill area.

:eyeroll: