How Big Is The Fake News Problem?

How Big Is The Fake News Problem?

Author
Discussion

Funkycoldribena

7,379 posts

155 months

Sunday 3rd September 2017
quotequote all
durbster said:
Don't know if anyone saw this story the other day about a "Christian child" being corrupted by evil Muslim foster parents. The Mail Online (of course) took it and spun it into something for their readership to be furious about:


The image they used to accompany the article was stock photograph taken in Dubai, and they even Photoshopped an extra veil to make sure it provoked the full reaction from their readership. Gotta keep that website traffic flowing.

The story was largely bks, if you compare the press version against the court documents:
https://tompride.wordpress.com/2017/08/31/how-the-...

And this is the problem. Trump is a moron banging on about Fake News, but how can you argue when the established press roll out this guff. When there's no clear distinction between clickbait like the above, and proper journalism, our free press - our best weapon against corruption - is catastrophically undermined.
No one apart from those who posted in the 50(?)page thread about it.smile

BlackLabel

Original Poster:

13,251 posts

124 months

durbster

10,288 posts

223 months

Sunday 3rd September 2017
quotequote all
Funkycoldribena said:
No one apart from those who posted in the 50(?)page thread about it.smile
Ah OK. hehe

I did have a quick look through the last few pages of NP&E as it seemed perfect fodder for this place. I obviously missed it.

babatunde

736 posts

191 months

Sunday 3rd September 2017
quotequote all
Funkycoldribena said:
No one apart from those who posted in the 50(?)page thread about it.smile
It's the Daily Mail, they aren't really a newspaper it's like calling fox news a "news station" there is a reason here on PH we "qualify" any links to the DM

rscott

14,773 posts

192 months

Sunday 3rd September 2017
quotequote all
babatunde said:
Funkycoldribena said:
No one apart from those who posted in the 50(?)page thread about it.smile
It's the Daily Mail, they aren't really a newspaper it's like calling fox news a "news station" there is a reason here on PH we "qualify" any links to the DM
Wikipedia don't hold the Mail in high esteem - https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com...

bigkeeko

1,370 posts

144 months

Monday 4th September 2017
quotequote all
Fake news is nothing new. Look at WW2. The `winners` made the most of it. In fact even in recent times (Iraq war) we faked the news. Going further some have faked history and still are faking it passing trash movies off as `actual events` or `The following actually happened`.

grumbledoak

31,548 posts

234 months

Monday 4th September 2017
quotequote all
rscott said:
Wikipedia don't hold the Mail in high esteem - https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com...
That's hilarious! The Gurdian crowing that Wikipedia doesn't trust the Mail.

There are no newspapers, or news media. Not in the sense the words suggest. All of them are beholden to advertisers, or owners, or editors, or political parties. You would have to be stupid to trust what you read in any of them.

rscott

14,773 posts

192 months

Monday 4th September 2017
quotequote all
grumbledoak said:
rscott said:
Wikipedia don't hold the Mail in high esteem - https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com...
That's hilarious! The Gurdian crowing that Wikipedia doesn't trust the Mail.

There are no newspapers, or news media. Not in the sense the words suggest. All of them are beholden to advertisers, or owners, or editors, or political parties. You would have to be stupid to trust what you read in any of them.
Would you prefer Fox News opinion. - http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2017/02/09/wikipedia-b...

Funkycoldribena

7,379 posts

155 months

Monday 4th September 2017
quotequote all
rscott said:
grumbledoak said:
rscott said:
Wikipedia don't hold the Mail in high esteem - https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com...
That's hilarious! The Gurdian crowing that Wikipedia doesn't trust the Mail.

There are no newspapers, or news media. Not in the sense the words suggest. All of them are beholden to advertisers, or owners, or editors, or political parties. You would have to be stupid to trust what you read in any of them.
Would you prefer Fox News opinion. - http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2017/02/09/wikipedia-b...
So you post a link to news media???

Jonesy23

4,650 posts

137 months

Sunday 21st January 2018
quotequote all
So who decides what the official facts are then? Will they be calling themselves the Ministry of Truth?


I for one welcome a new enlightened age under our great Leader May, the Party and Minitrue.

(Not)

grumbledoak

31,548 posts

234 months

Monday 22nd January 2018
quotequote all
Oh sure, trust the government. They tell us the truth all the time.
rofl

If this is done officially we'll have a Government Truth department posting us Government Facts, which no-one with a brain cell will believe, and if it is done covertly it's just more paid activist voices online.

durbster

10,288 posts

223 months

Monday 22nd January 2018
quotequote all
Jonesy23 said:
So who decides what the official facts are then? Will they be calling themselves the Ministry of Truth?
There's this thing they used to use in the old days called evidence. smile

The problem is, the internet has demonstrated how terrible people generally are at critical thinking, and now we're bombarded with bullst all day long the only solution is surely better education. The money would probably be better invested in a Government campaign that showed people how to read the internet critically, and parse fact from fiction.

Poor science education is at the heart of a lot of the problem with fake news. The booming "wellness" industry is testament to that.

glazbagun

14,282 posts

198 months

Monday 22nd January 2018
quotequote all
durbster said:
Jonesy23 said:
So who decides what the official facts are then? Will they be calling themselves the Ministry of Truth?
There's this thing they used to use in the old days called evidence. smile

The problem is, the internet has demonstrated how terrible people generally are at critical thinking, and now we're bombarded with bullst all day long the only solution is surely better education. The money would probably be better invested in a Government campaign that showed people how to read the internet critically, and parse fact from fiction.

Poor science education is at the heart of a lot of the problem with fake news. The booming "wellness" industry is testament to that.
Yeah it's hard to see us as anything but doomed.

Meanwhile basic stuff like sexual health is going backwards and young people are inaware of actual facts that could have real impact on them:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-42747892

I really think the BBC should have a mandatory "boring but important" section of five mins every half hour on 24hr news and the second story on it's website.

The media let us down terribly and we vote and treat each other according to our ignorance. It leaves us ripe pickings for the politically unethical.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/bri...

BlackLabel

Original Poster:

13,251 posts

124 months

Saturday 10th February 2018
quotequote all
11 MPs have flown from London to NY, before travelling to DC to spend three hours questioning Google, Facebook and Twitter executives who had offered to come to the UK to be questioned. All in the name of tackling fake news.

https://www.buzzfeed.com/amphtml/markdistefano/we-...


Countdown

39,973 posts

197 months

Saturday 10th February 2018
quotequote all
Such selfless hardworking people and yet I’m sure the MSM will portray this as some sort of “jolly”.

Dogwatch

6,230 posts

223 months

Saturday 10th February 2018
quotequote all
Countdown said:
Such selfless hardworking people and yet I’m sure the MSM will portray this as some sort of “jolly”.
Guido Fawkes certainly does!

Clicky

jmorgan

36,010 posts

285 months

Saturday 10th February 2018
quotequote all
No video conferencing?

glazbagun

14,282 posts

198 months

Tuesday 19th June 2018
quotequote all
Only one survey, but this has worrying implications and would also explain some of the total nonsense some people believe.

Only one in four correctly distinguish facts from opinion.


durbster

10,288 posts

223 months

Tuesday 19th June 2018
quotequote all
glazbagun said:
Only one survey, but this has worrying implications and would also explain some of the total nonsense some people believe.

Only one in four correctly distinguish facts from opinion.
On this theme, this is well worth a listen:
https://youarenotsosmart.com/2018/02/26/yanss-122-...

It explains how we will put our tribal connections over and above even the most obvious facts. Our natural instinct to be accepted by others overrides our critical thinking skills.

This is why the idea that you can convince people of something by simply presenting them with the facts just doesn't work. We are just not programmed that way.

This is why so much of our discourse is framed in tribal ways now. Information is presented as us vs them all the time, and it's created this distorted reality on a number of issues.

We need to understand this stuff to realise none of us are immune to it, and then we need to figure out how to get around it.