Heseltine Sacked
Discussion
Dakkon said:
Good, he should have left a while ago, and the arrogant fker say his experience will be missed, please don't let the door hit you on the way out.
I am inclined to agree. Hopefully he's also self selected himself for a thinning out of the Lords...
Edited by Murph7355 on Wednesday 8th March 09:52
He has a reputation as a 'bolter' when he can't get his own way. His arrogance from a self-belief of lofty entitlement is legend. Reference the long look back when he walked the length of Downing Street to his waiting car. He was hoping there would be some minion calling him back for 'discussions'. Sorry to disappoint matey, after 40 years you leave in disgrace as a traitor, rep in tatters and nowhere to go. Still, plenty of time to burnish that enviable voting record in the HoL at 2.7%. That's nearly three times out of every hundred divisions. Such hard work for such a wise and able member.
Edited by Thorodin on Wednesday 8th March 14:25
Thorodin said:
He has a reputation as a 'bolter' when he can't get his own way. His arrogance from a self-belief of lofty entitlement is legend. Reference the long look back when he walked the length of Downing Street to his waiting car. He was hoping there would be some minion calling him back for 'discussions'. Sorry to disappoint matey, after 40 years you leave in disgrace as a traitor, rep in tatters and nowhere to go. Still, plenty of time to burnish that enviable voting record in the HoL at 2.7%. That's nearly three times out of every hundred divisions. Such hard work for such a wise and able member.
How is he a traitor?Edited by Thorodin on Wednesday 8th March 14:25
TTwiggy said:
Thorodin said:
He has a reputation as a 'bolter' when he can't get his own way. His arrogance from a self-belief of lofty entitlement is legend. Reference the long look back when he walked the length of Downing Street to his waiting car. He was hoping there would be some minion calling him back for 'discussions'. Sorry to disappoint matey, after 40 years you leave in disgrace as a traitor, rep in tatters and nowhere to go. Still, plenty of time to burnish that enviable voting record in the HoL at 2.7%. That's nearly three times out of every hundred divisions. Such hard work for such a wise and able member.
How is he a traitor?Edited by Thorodin on Wednesday 8th March 14:25
Thorodin said:
TTwiggy said:
Thorodin said:
He has a reputation as a 'bolter' when he can't get his own way. His arrogance from a self-belief of lofty entitlement is legend. Reference the long look back when he walked the length of Downing Street to his waiting car. He was hoping there would be some minion calling him back for 'discussions'. Sorry to disappoint matey, after 40 years you leave in disgrace as a traitor, rep in tatters and nowhere to go. Still, plenty of time to burnish that enviable voting record in the HoL at 2.7%. That's nearly three times out of every hundred divisions. Such hard work for such a wise and able member.
How is he a traitor?Edited by Thorodin on Wednesday 8th March 14:25
JawKnee said:
After another humiliating defeat in the Lords we now see what wounded animal, Theresa May is capable of.
She's not quite the listening sort is she?
the party line was to support Brexit. He didnt, so was fired. Its the same as when Corbyn's lot refuse to take his party line. Are they fired? Yes, sometimes. Some quit instead and trigger a by-election. Its not really that big news. She's not quite the listening sort is she?
Oh, and she is listening: (wait for it...) listening to the majority of the public, who voted to leave the EU. One of the few politicians who do listen to the voters.
TTwiggy said:
Oh I see. It's more 'will of the people' stuff then. I thought maybe you had something substantive on him. What do you mean by misogyny? Are you saying he only voted that way because we have a woman PM?
I'm sure there's no need for denigrating comment on another's views - that's been the main source of contention and conflict from the start! I'm reasonably sure you know full well the 'will of the people stuff' was what happened at the referendum. The vote in the HoC was the settled will of parliament by a cross-party near-400 majority as a result of the will of the people. Did you honestly think a nobody like me stood any chance whatsoever of getting anything 'substantive' on him? Or was that just mocking hyperbole?
I'm also equally sure you are aware of what misogyny means although in this case I don't think 'hatred' is relevant. More resentment. I don't think coincidence or animus had any causative effect on the fact that holding subservient roles in the government of two female PM's (and failing to charm either) has resulted in him showing off.
I'm assuming I did not misunderstand your reply. If I did, I apologise!
Thorodin said:
TTwiggy said:
Oh I see. It's more 'will of the people' stuff then. I thought maybe you had something substantive on him. What do you mean by misogyny? Are you saying he only voted that way because we have a woman PM?
I'm sure there's no need for denigrating comment on another's views - that's been the main source of contention and conflict from the start! I'm reasonably sure you know full well the 'will of the people stuff' was what happened at the referendum. The vote in the HoC was the settled will of parliament by a cross-party near-400 majority as a result of the will of the people. Did you honestly think a nobody like me stood any chance whatsoever of getting anything 'substantive' on him? Or was that just mocking hyperbole?
I'm also equally sure you are aware of what misogyny means although in this case I don't think 'hatred' is relevant. More resentment. I don't think coincidence or animus had any causative effect on the fact that holding subservient roles in the government of two female PM's (and failing to charm either) has resulted in him showing off.
I'm assuming I did not misunderstand your reply. If I did, I apologise!
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff