Scottish Referendum / Independence - Vol 8

Scottish Referendum / Independence - Vol 8

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

Edinburger

10,403 posts

168 months

Wednesday 23rd October 2019
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
Edinburger said:
hidetheelephants said:
Murph7355 said:
Klippie said:
She's an embarrassment to Scotland, they tied her in knots - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FaD959SgOjw

I know more people who can't stand the SNP that like them, they will tell as many as will listen that the SNP speak for the people of Scotland...they absolutley do not.
And yet...they still win 56 seats in Parliament.

How so?
Because FPTP is a somewhat flawed electoral system.
In Scotland, we use the Additional Member System.
Sadly they don’t do much do they - cost a lot yet those in power simply go over and over Indy Scotland were sick of it.

I wonder why Gina Miller doesn’t go to the high court to force SNP to get on with the job of being in power rather than pissing in the wind. (Sorry if that would be a salary loss to you burger but hey such is life)
Sorry? What are you talking about?

Edinburger

10,403 posts

168 months

Wednesday 23rd October 2019
quotequote all
Sway said:
Edinburger said:
Jeez. Speak with commuters and visitors. Ask them if they'd prefer to sit on a fast comfortable tram gliding effortlessly between stops or a bus held up behind every other blooming bus in the bus lane.

Subjective, but the tram is a far better experience in my view. And get over the spend - it's already been spent.

You could also ask why we're spending £18bn on Crossrail when you can get on other trains to make the same journey. But that's not SNP bashing.
It seems this is a really difficult concept for you.

I'll go slow, let me know where you struggle...

Imagine, just for a moment, the exact same thing that's there now. The dedicated space just for trams, built specifically for the main bottleneck.

Exactly like it is now. Except built without very, very expensive rails and electric lines.

Still with me?

It's like a road, but for no other traffic.

Then, on that road, for no other traffic, instead of teams which are joined together as one fairly big lump.

Instead of them, you have shiny new buses, identical in almost every way to shiny new trams, except cheaper and with two forms of suspension giving an even better ride.

Now, imagine that because those shiny new buses don't have to be joined nose to tail, they can run more frequently, and if there's a problem with one it has a lesser impact (both in delays, flow and resolution).

Are you still with me?

Shiny, new buses.

Smooth, comfortable.

Running on the same new route.

But more frequently, with fewer issues, and more comfortably.

All for far less than half the price...

Yes, it's too late for the airport link trams. The money has been wasted.

That doesn't mean we can't learn from it, and do better next time.

Next time, it wouldn't mean several years of utter fking chaos with half the city dug up or delayed thanks to the need to put rails down...
Aah, I see. Silly me. I thought buses shared bus lanes with other buses. And taxis. And bikes. And I thought that's one reason why they're so blooming slow as they're queuing up at bus stops. Silly me. It's one bus at a time. Thanks for explaining.

Edinburger

10,403 posts

168 months

Wednesday 23rd October 2019
quotequote all
technodup said:
Evercross said:
technodup said:
There's only one parliament worth talking about. The one he is talking about. The one where the SNP have 56 bodies.
Steady on there. 35 at the last count!
My bad, they lost a few last time didn't they.

Sway said:
Shiny, new buses.
Glasgow's got a lot of shiny new buses these days. Wifi, changing points, leather seats, cameras everywhere, plus the timing info on the screens at the stops, and the new bus only streets in the town. They've gone right up in the world tbh.

Between that, the train network and the new properly sectioned off cycle routes we're pishing all over some poxy trams that only go to one place.
Buses as you described aren't unique to Glasgow. Everywhere has "shiny new buses" with all mod cons.

Edinburger

10,403 posts

168 months

Wednesday 23rd October 2019
quotequote all
alangla said:
Thing is, Edinburgh DID have separate roads for buses in the early 2000s. The bit that’s now the tram line between about Edinburgh Park and around Murrayfield was a guided busway originally. Wasn’t particularly comfortable or fast as I remember, the buses kind of bumped off the sides of the concrete track. All re-purposed during the early part of the tram project.
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/West_Edinburg...
Yep - bang on!

Edinburger

10,403 posts

168 months

Wednesday 23rd October 2019
quotequote all
simoid said:
Sway said:
Edinburger said:
Jeez. Speak with commuters and visitors. Ask them if they'd prefer to sit on a fast comfortable tram gliding effortlessly between stops or a bus held up behind every other blooming bus in the bus lane.

Subjective, but the tram is a far better experience in my view. And get over the spend - it's already been spent.

You could also ask why we're spending £18bn on Crossrail when you can get on other trains to make the same journey. But that's not SNP bashing.
It seems this is a really difficult concept for you.

I'll go slow, let me know where you struggle...

Imagine, just for a moment, the exact same thing that's there now. The dedicated space just for trams, built specifically for the main bottleneck.

Exactly like it is now. Except built without very, very expensive rails and electric lines.

Still with me?

It's like a road, but for no other traffic.

Then, on that road, for no other traffic, instead of teams which are joined together as one fairly big lump.

Instead of them, you have shiny new buses, identical in almost every way to shiny new trams, except cheaper and with two forms of suspension giving an even better ride.

Now, imagine that because those shiny new buses don't have to be joined nose to tail, they can run more frequently, and if there's a problem with one it has a lesser impact (both in delays, flow and resolution).

Are you still with me?

Shiny, new buses.

Smooth, comfortable.

Running on the same new route.

But more frequently, with fewer issues, and more comfortably.

All for far less than half the price...

Yes, it's too late for the airport link trams. The money has been wasted.

That doesn't mean we can't learn from it, and do better next time.

Next time, it wouldn't mean several years of utter fking chaos with half the city dug up or delayed thanks to the need to put rails down...
Subjective I know but... buses are bds and trams are lovely. Even tram drivers are nicer people than bus drivers. They smile more because they have a bell to ring.

And buses are big loud things and trams are quiet. Bustards are so loud that they are banned from running at bedtime while trams are allowed to glide silently all night (did I get that right?)

And trams are fast - so very fast. Almost as fast as a child could cycle! Buses are limited to like 23mph or something and definitely can’t go over that speed.
I wonder if people campaigned against airports when perfectly good trains to London were available. Or if people campaigned against cars when perfectly good horses were available. Or if people campaigned against walking on the ground when perfectly good trees to swing through were available.

It's called progress, my son.

Edinburger

10,403 posts

168 months

Wednesday 23rd October 2019
quotequote all
Klippie said:
Murph7355 said:
And yet...they still win 56 seats in Parliament.

How so?
Single digit majorities show there are a lot of people out there who do not vote for the SNP.
True of most elections and parties.

Evercross

5,967 posts

64 months

Wednesday 23rd October 2019
quotequote all
Still haven't learned how to edit all your quotes and responses into one reply I see 'burger.

(Or is it that the bot software at SNP HQ isn't sophisticated enough wink ).

Edinburger

10,403 posts

168 months

Wednesday 23rd October 2019
quotequote all
Evercross said:
Still haven't learned how to edit all your quotes and responses into one reply I see 'burger.

(Or is it that the bot software at SNP HQ isn't sophisticated enough wink ).
Why would I choose to consolidate them all into a single response? Why? Do you ever use PH on your phone?

Evercross

5,967 posts

64 months

Wednesday 23rd October 2019
quotequote all
Edinburger said:
Why would I choose to consolidate them all into a single response? Why? Do you ever use PH on your phone?
Ah I get it. The 'bot software runs on Android (or is it iOS)?

Edinburger

10,403 posts

168 months

Wednesday 23rd October 2019
quotequote all
Evercross said:
Edinburger said:
Why would I choose to consolidate them all into a single response? Why? Do you ever use PH on your phone?
Ah I get it. The 'bot software runs on Android (or is it iOS)?
rolleyes

Just think about the length of those replies in a single post.

NRS

22,170 posts

201 months

Wednesday 23rd October 2019
quotequote all
Edinburger said:
Aah, I see. Silly me. I thought buses shared bus lanes with other buses. And taxis. And bikes. And I thought that's one reason why they're so blooming slow as they're queuing up at bus stops. Silly me. It's one bus at a time. Thanks for explaining.
The airport bus takes basically the same time as the tram into the centre though...

technodup

7,581 posts

130 months

Wednesday 23rd October 2019
quotequote all
Edinburger said:
Buses as you described aren't unique to Glasgow. Everywhere has "shiny new buses" with all mod cons.
I'll take your word for it. I don't often use scheme taxis, because I don't live in a scheme.

sbarclay62

616 posts

57 months

Wednesday 23rd October 2019
quotequote all
NRS said:
The airport bus takes basically the same time as the tram into the centre though...
Perhaps on a Sunday morning. I'd be surprised if thats the case at morning and evening rushour.

A.J.M

7,909 posts

186 months

Wednesday 23rd October 2019
quotequote all
So buses vs trams is more debatable than shagger Salmond, possible deleted evidence and a 25% tarrif on whisky.

The last one is a large torpedo to my mates claims an independent Scotland could use whisky as the new oil fund.

NRS

22,170 posts

201 months

Wednesday 23rd October 2019
quotequote all
Whisky is also in a big bubble now, so it would be a good replacement for the oil price assumptions at the last vote.

Evercross

5,967 posts

64 months

Wednesday 23rd October 2019
quotequote all
A.J.M said:
So buses vs trams is more debatable than shagger Salmond, possible deleted evidence and a 25% tarrif on whisky.
yes
Squirrel central though from the person who says this thread keeps going OT.

The radio-silence from the SNats over the whisky tariff is an absolute hoot - just doesn't play at all with their fake narratives on EU membership as an independent country. It must really stick in their craw that their only chance of shaking-off the tariff is for the UK to leave the EU and negotiate a FTA with the US.

F'kn idiots think they are the world's best pals yet when RoW kicks them in the nads they keep quiet. Still also haven't heard a peep from them about the Scots-born diplomat being held in China. The SNP clearly only have a problem with the English because any other state can dump on them with impunity.

Edited by Evercross on Wednesday 23 October 16:56

Klippie

3,151 posts

145 months

Wednesday 23rd October 2019
quotequote all
Murph7355 said:
But still enough do. Why?

)(My bad on numbers. 35 not 56 (that was 2015).

I agree that they do not speak for Scotland, which makes their remain bluster all the more ironic. But they obviously ha e plenty of support.... And I suspect it will likely increase again at the next GE only heightening the noise.
They can have all the seats in Scotland it won't do them the slightest bit of good as thier Tory Masters have already said they won't give the nod to a second referendum.

They have been bleating on about this like a barin wi a soor face since the day after their 2014 failure.

Their support is on the slide...that'll make her face even more torn.

https://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/poll-scotti...

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/poll-finds-1-in...

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/2019/10/22/nic...

Evercross

5,967 posts

64 months

Wednesday 23rd October 2019
quotequote all
Klippie said:
rofl

I want to see how the SNats will bat that one away considering the research was done by an organisation run by their own former leader in the HoC.

But,....but....independence is inevitable!
rofl

Edinburger

10,403 posts

168 months

Wednesday 23rd October 2019
quotequote all
sbarclay62 said:
NRS said:
The airport bus takes basically the same time as the tram into the centre though...
Perhaps on a Sunday morning. I'd be surprised if thats the case at morning and evening rushour.
I've only got the airport bus a few times but I'd be amazed if it's the same time as the tram.

Edinburger

10,403 posts

168 months

Wednesday 23rd October 2019
quotequote all
technodup said:
Edinburger said:
Buses as you described aren't unique to Glasgow. Everywhere has "shiny new buses" with all mod cons.
I'll take your word for it. I don't often use scheme taxis, because I don't live in a scheme.
Scheme taxis? WTF?
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED