The new Dianne Abbott appreciation thread
Discussion
djdest said:
She was just on breakfast tv getting a grilling from Piers Morgan, she was flatly refusing to answer his question as to whether illegal immigrants should be kicked out or not.
As she blundered her way through you could clearly hear someone in the background with a loud voice that sounded like they were telling her what to say
Daily Star link aside, the video of this interview is here: https://www.dailystar.co.uk/showbiz-tv/hot-tv/6993...As she blundered her way through you could clearly hear someone in the background with a loud voice that sounded like they were telling her what to say
My god...she’s a vacuous, clueless cretin.
(That’s not an insult....it seems to be fact).
How the heck can anyone justify voting for a party with that as home secretary?
I can only presume half the electorate are at her level or lower.
There really needs to be a minimal level of education or ability to enter politics.
(That’s not an insult....it seems to be fact).
How the heck can anyone justify voting for a party with that as home secretary?
I can only presume half the electorate are at her level or lower.
There really needs to be a minimal level of education or ability to enter politics.
Edited by philv on Monday 30th April 12:23
KTF said:
djdest said:
She was just on breakfast tv getting a grilling from Piers Morgan, she was flatly refusing to answer his question as to whether illegal immigrants should be kicked out or not.
As she blundered her way through you could clearly hear someone in the background with a loud voice that sounded like they were telling her what to say
Daily Star link aside, the video of this interview is here: https://www.dailystar.co.uk/showbiz-tv/hot-tv/6993...As she blundered her way through you could clearly hear someone in the background with a loud voice that sounded like they were telling her what to say
djdest said:
As she blundered her way through you could clearly hear someone in the background with a loud voice that sounded like they were telling her what to say
I'm not sure if the person was coaching her or not but it reminded me of the NTNON sketch:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2n87YKSjrA
Russian Troll Bot said:
KTF said:
djdest said:
She was just on breakfast tv getting a grilling from Piers Morgan, she was flatly refusing to answer his question as to whether illegal immigrants should be kicked out or not.
As she blundered her way through you could clearly hear someone in the background with a loud voice that sounded like they were telling her what to say
Daily Star link aside, the video of this interview is here: https://www.dailystar.co.uk/showbiz-tv/hot-tv/6993...As she blundered her way through you could clearly hear someone in the background with a loud voice that sounded like they were telling her what to say
t up on the hoof. Clearly, either there is no Labour published policy, or alternatively she is not aware of it and just joined a load of vague words together that could be redefined later. As a potential person who could take office to be responsible for such matters, she is a total liability.
TVR Moneypit said:
djdest said:
She was just on breakfast tv getting a grilling from Piers Morgan, she was flatly refusing to answer his question as to whether illegal immigrants should be kicked out or not.
As she blundered her way through you could clearly hear someone in the background with a loud voice that sounded like they were telling her what to say
Yep, I watched that too. Six minutes of the Shadow Home Secretary failing to answer a simple question.As she blundered her way through you could clearly hear someone in the background with a loud voice that sounded like they were telling her what to say
It's funny now. But won't be quite so funny when Comrade Corbyn wins the next GE and Dianne Abbott is actually Home Secretary
On the plus side, Daytime TV so larger amounts of labour voters will have seen that, unlike her usual Radio 4 gaffs.
philv said:
My god...she’s a vacuous, clueless cretin.
(That’s not an insult....it seems to be fact).
How the heck can anyone justify voting for a party with that as home secretary?
I can only presume half the electorate are at her level or lower.
There really needs to be a minimal level of education or ability to enter politics.
Whist I won't disagree with your assessment of her as a "vacuous, clueless cretin", I would point out that she is a graduate of Cambridge University with a degree in history - and so is likely to clear any minimum hurdle for education with some ease.(That’s not an insult....it seems to be fact).
How the heck can anyone justify voting for a party with that as home secretary?
I can only presume half the electorate are at her level or lower.
There really needs to be a minimal level of education or ability to enter politics.
SeeFive said:
Russian Troll Bot said:
KTF said:
djdest said:
She was just on breakfast tv getting a grilling from Piers Morgan, she was flatly refusing to answer his question as to whether illegal immigrants should be kicked out or not.
As she blundered her way through you could clearly hear someone in the background with a loud voice that sounded like they were telling her what to say
Daily Star link aside, the video of this interview is here: https://www.dailystar.co.uk/showbiz-tv/hot-tv/6993...As she blundered her way through you could clearly hear someone in the background with a loud voice that sounded like they were telling her what to say
t up on the hoof. Clearly, either there is no Labour published policy, or alternatively she is not aware of it and just joined a load of vague words together that could be redefined later. As a potential person who could take office to be responsible for such matters, she is a total liability.
Deptford Draylons said:
The way she speaks in interviews is like someone unused to having an ear microphone, with someone else speaking to her via it, always stalling for time to understand whats being said ' welllll.......I think...... that ....... maybe ....' .
I have heard her in real life, it is exactly the same. AstonZagato said:
Whist I won't disagree with your assessment of her as a "vacuous, clueless cretin", I would point out that she is a graduate of Cambridge University with a degree in history - and so is likely to clear any minimum hurdle for education with some ease.
That was what, 45 years ago? She seems like she has had a few strokes and a touch of dementia since then.
AstonZagato said:
philv said:
My god...she’s a vacuous, clueless cretin.
(That’s not an insult....it seems to be fact).
How the heck can anyone justify voting for a party with that as home secretary?
I can only presume half the electorate are at her level or lower.
There really needs to be a minimal level of education or ability to enter politics.
Whist I won't disagree with your assessment of her as a "vacuous, clueless cretin", I would point out that she is a graduate of Cambridge University with a degree in history - and so is likely to tick lots of diversity boxes with some ease.(That’s not an insult....it seems to be fact).
How the heck can anyone justify voting for a party with that as home secretary?
I can only presume half the electorate are at her level or lower.
There really needs to be a minimal level of education or ability to enter politics.
gizlaroc said:
Deptford Draylons said:
The way she speaks in interviews is like someone unused to having an ear microphone, with someone else speaking to her via it, always stalling for time to understand whats being said ' welllll.......I think...... that ....... maybe ....' .
I have heard her in real life, it is exactly the same. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PZ_LyJfYe8
gizlaroc said:
AstonZagato said:
Whist I won't disagree with your assessment of her as a "vacuous, clueless cretin", I would point out that she is a graduate of Cambridge University with a degree in history - and so is likely to clear any minimum hurdle for education with some ease.
That was what, 45 years ago? She seems like she has had a few strokes and a touch of dementia since then.
Talking slowly, talking rubbish, lots of errors etc. Using completely the wrong words or putting them in the wrong order, a complete lack of numeracy.
REALIST123 said:
gizlaroc said:
AstonZagato said:
Whist I won't disagree with your assessment of her as a "vacuous, clueless cretin", I would point out that she is a graduate of Cambridge University with a degree in history - and so is likely to clear any minimum hurdle for education with some ease.
That was what, 45 years ago? She seems like she has had a few strokes and a touch of dementia since then.
Talking slowly, talking rubbish, lots of errors etc. Using completely the wrong words or putting them in the wrong order, a complete lack of numeracy.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff