The Gender Non-binary debate.

[Noodle1982]

gregs656 said:

Noodle1982 said:

Agreed.

Dissociative identity disorder.

I know this is meant to be a sideways swipe, but I find it absolutely fascinating that you are completely comfortable with the idea that someone can have DID - which gender fluidity is clearly not as it doesn't fit the criteria - but are unable or unwilling to accept that the gender fludity *aspect* of DID, which not everyone with DID suffers, could arise in isolation.

This whole topic is fascinating.

[AshVX220]

Fermit and Sexy Sarah said:

Clockwork Cupcake said:

Fermit and Sexy Sarah said:

Hands off, I saw her first! (just don't tell her indoors.... )

Well you'll have issues if I do succeed in being her.

Trust me Jo, if you look like that zero sts shall be given

I had to google her and she is utterly stunning!

[George Smiley]

AshVX220 said:

I had to google her and she is utterly stunning!

Debbie Harry? She’s older than Noah’s ark

[Noodle1982]

George Smiley said:

AshVX220 said:

I had to google her and she is utterly stunning!

Debbie Harry? She’s older than Noah’s ark

And more wooden.

[Clockwork Cupcake]

George Smiley said:

Debbie Harry? She’s older than Noah’s ark

That's somewhat typical of you to think we're talking about one thing when we're talking about another, George.

[George Smiley]

Clockwork Cupcake said:

George Smiley said:

Debbie Harry? She’s older than Noah’s ark

That's somewhat typical of you to think we're talking about one thing when we're talking about another, George.

Who you talking about now?

[Clockwork Cupcake]

George Smiley said:

Who you talking about now?

And, also typically for you, you expect people to spoon-feed you with a repetition of information already given rather that reading back through the thread.

(I'm pulling your leg, although it is also true)

[George Smiley]

Clockwork Cupcake said:

And, also typically for you, you expect people to spoon-feed you with a repetition of information already given rather that reading back through the thread.

(I'm pulling your leg, although it is also true)

Have you tried reading back through this thread?

Come on tell me so I can work out whether she’s fit

[Fermit and Sexy Sarah]

Clockwork Cupcake said:

George Smiley said:

Who you talking about now?

And, also typically for you, you expect people to spoon-feed you with a repetition of information already given rather that reading back through the thread.

(I'm pulling your leg, although it is also true)

JJ, you could tell George that black was white and he would argue that meant it is grey, you're wasting your energy. God knows how you put up with him.

[George Smiley]

Fermit and Sexy Sarah said:

JJ, you could tell George that black was white and he would argue that meant it is grey, you're wasting your energy. God knows how you put up with him.

?? We agree on nearly everything but sports and disclosure before sexy time

[AshVX220]

George, you only need go back two pages to identify who we were talking about....it's not something dragged up from long since forgotten thread history.

[Androgynous]

George Smiley said:

Watched predestination last night, mind blown

When your older male self meets your younger female self, has a baby, time travels and delivers the baby to an orphanage and then finally executes your older self. What's confusing about that?

[George Smiley]

Androgynous said:

When your older male self meets your younger female self, has a baby, time travels and delivers the baby to an orphanage and then finally executes your older self. What's confusing about that?

You missed the part where you’re trying to stop the terrorist that turns out to be you

[8.4L 154]

George Smiley said:

Androgynous said:

When your older male self meets your younger female self, has a baby, time travels and delivers the baby to an orphanage and then finally executes your older self. What's confusing about that?

You missed the part where you’re trying to stop the terrorist that turns out to be you

And the bit where the baby your older male self had with your female self which was stolen by your other older self to be delivered to the orphanage in the past was your baby self.

[George Smiley]

8.4L 154 said:

And the bit where the baby your older male self had with your female self which was stolen by your other older self to be delivered to the orphanage in the past was your baby self.

It’s at least a story with no loose ends

[V10leptoquark]

Rivenink said:

Even if it is a psychological condition, does that mean they should be called attention seekers? Disrespected? Discriminated against? Attacked?

Are there many cases whereby people who claim to be another gender than they are biologically are being attacked and/or discriminated against?
Honest question.

[R Mutt]

V10leptoquark said:

Are there many cases whereby people who claim to be another gender than they are biologically are being attacked and/or discriminated against?
Honest question.

It seems that showing scepticism on here is considered discrimination enough.

Like most things it's best you don't question it or peoples right to be offended.

[NoVetec]

R Mutt said:

It seems that showing scepticism on here is considered discrimination enough.

Like most things it's best you don't question it or peoples right to be offended.

Not really, I and others have questioned/probed aspects of the wider debate and largely received constructive responses. It's all about how you word what your asking/asserting or pondering. Sure, what with this not being a face-face medium, more things get misconstrued more often yet it's ultimately not a hindrance.

[gregs656]

[The Li-ion King]

gregs656 said: