Finsbury Park

Author
Discussion

Alpinestars

13,954 posts

245 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
WinstonWolf said:
wsurfa said:
wc98 said:
B'stard Child said:
Yours don't leak?

Mine replaced a pair of Frank Thomas boots - I could walk all day in them and they never felt uncomfortable - they were resoled 3 times in 30 years and never leaked I was utterly gutted when the stitching actually rotted and they were falling apart.

So having had a pair of boots that had lasted 30 years and knowing in general that quality has gone down in line with price I pushed the boat out and bought a pair of Alpinestars that were technically well outside my lambrusco budget with champagne tastes

To say they have been a disappointment is an understatement...................

And they fking leak!!!
i prefer sidi black rain boots for wet weather riding. had mine for longer than i care to remember ,though the right boot was ruined on the first pair doing a track day on a cbr 400 with tired suspension at knockhill . the cure for that problem at the time was a new pair of boots and a new gsxr 750 ,well thought out solution that my wife couldn't argue with smile
Daytona security evo for me, fantastic, only downside is not currently having a bike to ride.....
AlpineStars? Meh, I'm a Crowtree man...
Very classic. Triumph bike?

XCP

16,933 posts

229 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
What have old motorbike boots got to do with Finsbury Park?

B'stard Child

28,444 posts

247 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
XCP said:
What have old motorbike boots got to do with Finsbury Park?
Absolutely nothing - but it's a better discussion than the one that was dominating the thread..........

Countdown

39,963 posts

197 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Stickyfinger said:
Whom am I to call out to march then Alpine ?
Which group do you thinks needs to step out ?

Help me out here and I will see what connections I can activate...
Funny...I know lots of muslims feel the same way when exactly the same accusations are levied against them......

Stickyfinger

8,429 posts

106 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Countdown said:
Stickyfinger said:
Whom am I to call out to march then Alpine ?
Which group do you thinks needs to step out ?

Help me out here and I will see what connections I can activate...
Funny...I know lots of muslims feel the same way when exactly the same accusations are levied against them......
What accusations would those be ?

Gavia

7,627 posts

92 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
BIANCO said:
What do you mean you don't think being kicked and beaten to death is not being brutally murdered? We don't have the death penalty in this country and if we did we wouldn't torture them to death.
Nicely avoiding the main point of my post.

Do younthink the terrorist scum who committed the London & Westminster Bridge attacks were brutally murdered too? Emotions run high when something like that happens and I'm damn sure you'd be nominating someone for a knighthood if they had got hold of any of the terrorists at the bridges and killed them.

Countdown

39,963 posts

197 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Stickyfinger said:
Countdown said:
Stickyfinger said:
Whom am I to call out to march then Alpine ?
Which group do you thinks needs to step out ?

Help me out here and I will see what connections I can activate...
Funny...I know lots of muslims feel the same way when exactly the same accusations are levied against them......
What accusations would those be ?
They get accused of being complicit in terrorist actions because they're not our marching or protesting.

Stickyfinger

8,429 posts

106 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Countdown said:
They get accused of being complicit in terrorist actions because they're not our marching or protesting.
Not by me....such accusations are daft.

Do you think letters and speeches by Imams/ Bishops/ Rabbi's etc and community leaders denouncing radical thinking reduces the risk of people being radicalised within their "flocks" and assist cohesion and trust between the various "sections" of the British public ?

Edited by Stickyfinger on Friday 23 June 12:58

TTwiggy

11,548 posts

205 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Gavia said:
BIANCO said:
What do you mean you don't think being kicked and beaten to death is not being brutally murdered? We don't have the death penalty in this country and if we did we wouldn't torture them to death.
Nicely avoiding the main point of my post.

Do younthink the terrorist scum who committed the London & Westminster Bridge attacks were brutally murdered too? Emotions run high when something like that happens and I'm damn sure you'd be nominating someone for a knighthood if they had got hold of any of the terrorists at the bridges and killed them.
I wonder wha the view might be on, say, a parish priest stepping in and protecting a terrorist in similar circumstances? Hero? Or unwanted god-botherer thwarting the will of mob?

TTwiggy

11,548 posts

205 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Stickyfinger said:
Do you think letters and speeches by Imams/ Bishops/ Rabbi's etc and community leaders denouncing radical thinking reduce the risk of people being radicalised within their "flocks" and assist cohesion and trust between the various "sections" of the British public ?


Edited by Stickyfinger on Friday 23 June 12:57
My kneejerk reaction would be to say no. But it's certainly the case that the end of the troubles in Northern Ireland were hastened by priests and vicars altering their stance to one of denouncement.

p1stonhead

25,568 posts

168 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Charged with 'Terorrism Related Murder'

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-40381794

Gavia

7,627 posts

92 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
p1stonhead said:
Charged with 'Terorrism Related Murder'

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-40381794
But, but, but, but ................... I don't accept it. My definition is what should be applied and I'm not saying what that is in case it results in a ban.

I may as well get this in for the apologists in advance wink

Stickyfinger

8,429 posts

106 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Gavia said:
p1stonhead said:
Charged with 'Terorrism Related Murder'

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-40381794
But, but, but, but ................... I don't accept it. My definition is what should be applied and I'm not saying what that is in case it results in a ban.

I may as well get this in for the apologists in advance wink
Wrong....to quick to claim your high ground

Terrorism-related murder and Attempted murder

The judge will decide which to accept.

Countdown

39,963 posts

197 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Stickyfinger said:
Countdown said:
They get accused of being complicit in terrorist actions because they're not our marching or protesting.
Not by me....such accusations are daft.
I didn't say you did. I was just making the point at how stupid it is to suggest that not marching/protesting/condemning doe snot automatically make one complicit.

Stickyfinger said:
Do you think letters and speeches by Imams/ Bishops/ Rabbi's etc and community leaders denouncing radical thinking reduces the risk of people being radicalised within their "flocks" and assist cohesion and trust between the various "sections" of the British public ?
Absolutely. However you do get some people who will still condemn Imams/Bishops/Rabbis for not denouncing radicalis/extremism even when you can provide umpteen links to the contrary.

Edited by Stickyfinger on Friday 23 June 12:58

Gavia

7,627 posts

92 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
BIANCO said:
They where running around with knifes killing people, a on going threat and need to be stopped. And they where stopped in the fastest most effective way available. If they gave up and or was neutralise then people ran up and kicked them to death then yes they would have been brutally murdered.
Once someone is no longer a threat, in a modern western society we ideally restrain them and allow the justice system to deal with them. We don't do mob justice it's what separates us from the backwards st holes around the rest of the world. But we seem to be in a race to the bottom in competition on who can be the most tolerant and virtuous.
What a load of BS. For all we know he jumped out of the van and was immediately jumped on by the crowd to prevent him going on a stabbing spree. You're making yourself look foolish, as you'd be defending anyone who attacked the London Bridge terrorists.

What's your view of Roy Larner for example? Thug or hero?

Amd again you betray your true feelings with "backwards stholes" comment, alongside the view that being tolerant is a race to the bottom.

PurpleMoonlight

22,362 posts

158 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Stickyfinger said:
Wrong....to quick to claim your high ground

Terrorism-related murder and Attempted murder

The judge will decide which to accept.
Indeed, not charged with Terrorism.

BBC tv report stated there is no legislated offence of terrorism related murder.

Stickyfinger

8,429 posts

106 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Countdown said:
If the leaders can have such an effect....why not a bigger effect by the whole community acting as one against those nutters who shield themselves within whichever community ?

Would that not also assist in the "trust" of other groups, would that not show everybody the power of peace ?

The "Mothers" protests against ALL the terrorists worked in NI did it not ?

It is not in any way a demand (as some sad feckers here would try and claim I make), it just seems to me a logical and bloody effective thing to do......win win win as I see it.

Alpinestars

13,954 posts

245 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Stickyfinger said:
Countdown said:
If the leaders can have such an effect....why not a bigger effect by the whole community acting as one against those nutters who shield themselves within whichever community ?

Would that not also assist in the "trust" of other groups, would that not show everybody the power of peace ?

The "Mothers" protests against ALL the terrorists worked in NI did it not ?

It is not in any way a demand (as some sad feckers here would try and claim I make), it just seems to me a logical and bloody effective thing to do......win win win as I see it.
So you fecker, when are you marching against islamophobe related terrorist murders?

Edited by Alpinestars on Friday 23 June 13:40

Gavia

7,627 posts

92 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Stickyfinger said:
If the leaders can have such an effect....why not a bigger effect by the whole community acting as one against those nutters who shield themselves within whichever community ?

Would that not also assist in the "trust" of other groups, would that not show everybody the power of peace ?

The "Mothers" protests against ALL the terrorists worked in NI did it not ?

It is not in any way a demand (as some sad feckers here would try and claim I make), it just seems to me a logical and bloody effective thing to do......win win win as I see it.
You seem to be missing the key point though. ISIS kill Muslims every day and in far greater numbers than they kill any other religion. Why should a group, who themselves are being killed en masse have to protest en masse against those who are killing them to show they disagree?

wiggy001

6,545 posts

272 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Gavia said:
You seem to be missing the key point though. ISIS kill Muslims every day and in far greater numbers than they kill any other religion. Why should a group, who themselves are being killed en masse have to protest en masse against those who are killing them to show they disagree?
They don't have to protest. They just have to stop turning a blind eye to extreme preachers radicalising their kids.