45th President of the United States, Donald Trump. Vol 3
Discussion
Breadvan72 said:
Eric Mc said:
I think this well known segment from the Congressional Investigation into Joseph McCarthy is very telling. I am hopeful that some day, someone will address Trump in a similar manner.
The pertinent moment is from 1:10 into the clip.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDa2s5MZuO8
"Mr Cohn" is Roy Cohn, Trump's mentor, and the sinister Mr Fix It of 70s New York. Another bag carrier for McCarthy was Richard Nixon.The pertinent moment is from 1:10 into the clip.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDa2s5MZuO8
Breadvan72 said:
As a history graduate I am biased, but whenever there is discussion about which academic subjects are important (the standard NPE approach sees history as a "soft" subject and not important), I would like to make the case that history is one of the most important subjects there is. I think that the study of history should be compulsory to school leaving age.
Absolutely, lest we are condemned to repeat it "the first time as tragedy, the second time as farce."I don't get to quote Marx very often.
Breadvan72 said:
As a history graduate I am biased, but whenever there is discussion about which academic subjects are important (the standard NPE approach sees history as a "soft" subject and not important), I would like to make the case that history is one of the most important subjects there is. I think that the study of history should be compulsory to school leaving age.
It is a subject that I regret dropping before GCSE, but thanks to the unique structure of the school, it wasn't possible for me to take History at the same time as IT.But of course, which bits of History should we study? French Revolution? Crimean War? Feudal System?
(off topic, but at a comedy show last week, one of the comedians made excellent use of his History degree as part of his act)
Shakermaker said:
Breadvan72 said:
As a history graduate I am biased, but whenever there is discussion about which academic subjects are important (the standard NPE approach sees history as a "soft" subject and not important), I would like to make the case that history is one of the most important subjects there is. I think that the study of history should be compulsory to school leaving age.
It is a subject that I regret dropping before GCSE, but thanks to the unique structure of the school, it wasn't possible for me to take History at the same time as IT.But of course, which bits of History should we study? French Revolution? Crimean War? Feudal System?
(off topic, but at a comedy show last week, one of the comedians made excellent use of his History degree as part of his act)
Breadvan72 said:
As a history graduate I am biased, but whenever there is discussion about which academic subjects are important (the standard NPE approach sees history as a "soft" subject and not important), I would like to make the case that history is one of the most important subjects there is. I think that the study of history should be compulsory to school leaving age.
Absolutely agree. Because everything's happened before, I started following a bunch of historians on Twitter after Trump got into power to see where we might be heading. None of them had good news. Roofless Toothless said:
Breadvan72 said:
As a history graduate I am biased, but whenever there is discussion about which academic subjects are important (the standard NPE approach sees history as a "soft" subject and not important), I would like to make the case that history is one of the most important subjects there is. I think that the study of history should be compulsory to school leaving age.
Absolutely, lest we are condemned to repeat it "the first time as tragedy, the second time as farce."I don't get to quote Marx very often.
jmorgan said:
Gorka was on R4 this am spinning a good tale. Really laying into Flake and Corker. I expect that Bannon will be fielding some really right wing candidates in their seats.
Yeah I heard Gorka, quite happily ignoring the lack of trump truths and promoting the fake news agenda and media bias.Side note though is the success? in Flake not running again as he's fed up. Get rid of the anti trump and try to promote in their place donald lackies, which is what Bannon alluded to.
sugerbear said:
This mornings twitter - "So nice being with Republican Senators today. Multiple standing ovations! Most are great people who want big Tax Cuts and success for U.S."
"Multiple standing ovations!" - everyone loves me... Honest...
Flake got standing ovations from some for his criticism of Trump. Did Trumps tweet follow that?"Multiple standing ovations!" - everyone loves me... Honest...
Eric, yes, study all of history and "only connect", as E M Forster said. There are various quite good single volume histories of everything.
Zod, you cheeky fecker, I had to do history prelims after eight weeks in order to make it to the second term, but then got to go punting and chase Sloanes for two summers, with crash bang wallop ten papers in five days in the third summer. One essay a week, no lectures.
Zod, you cheeky fecker, I had to do history prelims after eight weeks in order to make it to the second term, but then got to go punting and chase Sloanes for two summers, with crash bang wallop ten papers in five days in the third summer. One essay a week, no lectures.
Breadvan72 said:
Zod, you cheeky fecker, I had to do history prelims after eight weeks in order to make it to the second term, but then got to go punting and chase Sloanes for two summers, with crash bang wallop ten papers in five days in the third summer. One essay a week, no lectures.
Wasn't that at the other place? At mine, there are only Easter Term exams and I'm pretty sure the historians didn't see an examination room in the first two years. Odd that it qualified as a Tripos.Zod said:
I had similar restrictions at school (they made the fast stream do O Levels a year early, but also had us drop some "non-core" subjects. A pity, because if I'd done history through to A Level, I could have done the "doss degree" at university. I seem to remember that they only had final year exams.
We had to do History and/or Geography, so I did manage to get an A at GCSE in colouring in maps and learning about Oxbow lakes, which I was able to take on to A Level as well! Have I missed it or has it not been mentioned about the JFK files. All the CIA and FBI secret files that Trump is saying he's going to release.
http://edition.cnn.com/2017/10/21/politics/trump-j...
I wonder if it will spectacularly backfire on him?
http://edition.cnn.com/2017/10/21/politics/trump-j...
I wonder if it will spectacularly backfire on him?
FourWheelDrift said:
Have I missed it or has it not been mentioned about the JFK files. All the CIA and FBI secret files that Trump is saying he's going to release.
http://edition.cnn.com/2017/10/21/politics/trump-j...
I wonder if it will spectacularly backfire on him?
Trump is not releasing the files, Congress decided to release them ages ago. Trump is claiming credit as usual. http://edition.cnn.com/2017/10/21/politics/trump-j...
I wonder if it will spectacularly backfire on him?
Shakermaker said:
Zod said:
I had similar restrictions at school (they made the fast stream do O Levels a year early, but also had us drop some "non-core" subjects. A pity, because if I'd done history through to A Level, I could have done the "doss degree" at university. I seem to remember that they only had final year exams.
We had to do History and/or Geography, so I did manage to get an A at GCSE in colouring in maps and learning about Oxbow lakes, which I was able to take on to A Level as well! Byker28i said:
jmorgan said:
Getting interesting with regards the "dossier". Dems and Clinton and an unnamed Reb behind it.
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/10/24/trump-cli...
Gorka was on R4 this am spinning a good tale. Really laying into Flake and Corker. I expect that Bannon will be fielding some really right wing candidates in their seats.
I thought the dossier commissioning and funding was well known and documented. It was initially commissioned by Republicans who were against Trump, then after Trump won the primaries, Mark Elias took over funding the report for the Clinton Campaign so that Steele could finish the research/report.http://www.politico.com/story/2017/10/24/trump-cli...
Gorka was on R4 this am spinning a good tale. Really laying into Flake and Corker. I expect that Bannon will be fielding some really right wing candidates in their seats.
There's no cover up on that - it's been hugely reported at the time the dossier came out.
Whats interesting is that every claim on the report, bar the tape, has been proven to be true so far...
So why now try to again devalue the report? Is something about to break on the russian connections again? What's the issue with the Clinton campaign or Republicans against Trump getting intel on their opponent?
I mean it's not like they asked foreign national nationals to hack the opposition, organised meetings to discuss dirt obtained, organised the release of potentially damaging information, took funding for their election campaign from foreign nations/nationals...
Meanwhile, he has still not enacted the veto-proof sanctions congress pass by a super majority and then some.
There are a lot of jangling keys again these days.
Zod said:
Breadvan72 said:
Zod, you cheeky fecker, I had to do history prelims after eight weeks in order to make it to the second term, but then got to go punting and chase Sloanes for two summers, with crash bang wallop ten papers in five days in the third summer. One essay a week, no lectures.
Wasn't that at the other place? At mine, there are only Easter Term exams and I'm pretty sure the historians didn't see an examination room in the first two years. Odd that it qualified as a Tripos.I had to go to my place because I was too thick to understand the explanation of the Tripos system in your place's Prospectus.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff