45th President of the United States, Donald Trump. Vol 3

[rscott]

BlackFlag said:

Countdown said:

BlackFlag said:

Also lots on Uranium 1.

Ah yes...Uranium One.....again........

http://www.factcheck.org/2017/10/facts-uranium-one...
https://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-rus...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zeb4tal96ik
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUiP543q35k

Thankfully Wikileaks is free from politically motivated gatekeepers.

Even Mueller was involved.
https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/09STATE85588_a....

Looking pretty swampy.

Do you even read the links you post? What does delivery of a sample of smuggled uranium in 2009 have to to with a deal in 2010 which Clinton didn't have control over?

[rscott]

Countdown said:

BlackFlag said:

Countdown said:

BlackFlag said:

Also lots on Uranium 1.

Ah yes...Uranium One.....again........

http://www.factcheck.org/2017/10/facts-uranium-one...
https://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-rus...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zeb4tal96ik
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUiP543q35k

Thankfully Wikileaks is free from politically motivated gatekeepers.

Even Mueller was involved.
https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/09STATE85588_a....

Looking pretty swampy.

Ummmm....I'm going to take a guess and suggest you've not actually bothered to read the link you've posted, have you......?

It's almost as though he searched for uranium and posted the first link he found!

[Seventy]

It's like the Trump supporter who when asked if Jesus came down off the cross and told him that there was definite collusion between Trump and Russia would he then believe it and he replied that he would still have to check with Donald himself. On live television.
Pizzagate, birther, uranium 1 ad infinitum. Blind faith.

[Countdown]

rscott said:

Do you even read the links you post? What does delivery of a sample of smuggled uranium in 2009 have to to with a deal in 2010 which Clinton didn't have control over?

By Jove I've got it!

Mueller was taking a free sample to Putin (on behalf of Clinton) so that he could check the quality of the Uranium before agreeing to buy the mine.

Obvious when you think about it.....

[Escapegoat]

BlackFlag said:

Thankfully Wikileaks is free from politically motivated gatekeepers.

Even Mueller was involved.
https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/09STATE85588_a....

Looking pretty swampy.

Yes, please let us know which bits of that cable is relevant.

Perhaps it's cognitive dissonance that won't let me make the connection? I need your help Scherzy.

[Zod]

BlackFlag said:

Countdown said:

BlackFlag said:

Also lots on Uranium 1.

Ah yes...Uranium One.....again........

http://www.factcheck.org/2017/10/facts-uranium-one...
https://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-rus...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zeb4tal96ik
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUiP543q35k

Thankfully Wikileaks is free from politically motivated gatekeepers.

Even Mueller was involved.
https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/09STATE85588_a....

Looking pretty swampy.

You write as if you actually believe the crap you post!

[BlackFlag]

Byker28i said:

Zod said:

BlackFlag said:

Byker28i said:

It also points out that BlackFlag hasn't actually read them as mostly it's internal bhing and moaning.

A small sample of the goodies inside include:

Mook and Podesta planning the Russian narrative, Podesta's firm lobbying to remove sanctions on the Russian government, and communications with journalists like Maggie Habermann (NYT) and Glenn Thrush (Politico), who allowed the Clinton campaign to edit beforehand and plant stories. Glenn even calls himself a hack in one of them.

Also lots on Uranium 1. About the only subject I have not come across is the Dems paying Fusion GPS for the silly Peegate dossier. But that came out anways.

The leaks were seismic in terms of impact. In terms of the ability to distribute information and bypass gatekeepers, we are living through an amazing time in history right now.

Well, they were certainly well timed to help Trump, but "seismic"? No.

Uranium 1 was even debunked by Fox news - FOX NEWS! Trumps mouthpiece...

Edited by Byker28i on Friday 24th November 11:29

It wasn't debunked. Debunking means something was proven wrong.

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/355749...

CF received millions from Rosatom/U1 parties. Mueller should be investigated as well, as the FBI knew about the rackateering scheme taking place under his watch.

Edited by BlackFlag on Friday 24th November 12:37

[Zod]

rscott said:

Do you even read the links you post? What does delivery of a sample of smuggled uranium in 2009 have to to with a deal in 2010 which Clinton didn't have control over?

a moron said:

You know what uranium is, right? This thing called nuclear weapons like lots of things are done with uranium including some bad things.

[Colonial]

BlackFlag said:

Thankfully Wikileaks is free from politically motivated gatekeepers.

Even Mueller was involved.
https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/09STATE85588_a....

Looking pretty swampy.

Eff me. That's some serious cognitive dissonance.

I'm waiting for you to posting youtube videos about jet fuel and steel beams

[unrepentant]

Flynn's lawyers have stopped info sharing with Trump's. Not good news for the orange bigot.

[BlackFlag]

rscott said:

Do you even read the links you post? What does delivery of a sample of smuggled uranium in 2009 have to to with a deal in 2010 which Clinton didn't have control over?

Context and timing. While the specific incidents are seperate, the timeline is similar. Mueller unquestionably had knowledge of the U1 racketeering scheme.

Why would he agree to hand deliver a sample of stolen uranium to a (supposedly) hostile foreign agent? If the Russians determined the uranium was theirs, what would he have done? Give it back? To the Russians?

I can only imagine the uproar that would occur had Trump been involved. It would be laughable if it weren't real.

[p1stonhead]

BlackFlag said:

rscott said:

Do you even read the links you post? What does delivery of a sample of smuggled uranium in 2009 have to to with a deal in 2010 which Clinton didn't have control over?

Context and timing. While the specific incidents are seperate, the timeline is similar. Mueller unquestionably had knowledge of the U1 racketeering scheme.

Why would he agree to hand deliver a sample of stolen uranium to a (supposedly) hostile foreign agent? If the Russians determined the uranium was theirs, what would he have done? Give it back? To the Russians?

I can only imagine the uproar that would occur had Trump been involved. It would be laughable if it weren't real.

It is because its not.

[BlackFlag]

p1stonhead said:

BlackFlag said:

rscott said:

Do you even read the links you post? What does delivery of a sample of smuggled uranium in 2009 have to to with a deal in 2010 which Clinton didn't have control over?

Context and timing. While the specific incidents are seperate, the timeline is similar. Mueller unquestionably had knowledge of the U1 racketeering scheme.

Why would he agree to hand deliver a sample of stolen uranium to a (supposedly) hostile foreign agent? If the Russians determined the uranium was theirs, what would he have done? Give it back? To the Russians?

I can only imagine the uproar that would occur had Trump been involved. It would be laughable if it weren't real.

It is because its not.

For everyone else, there's Wikileaks.

[Colonial]

BlackFlag said:

For everyone else, there's Wikileaks.

A rapist defending a self confessed perpetrator of sexual assault.

Now that's a surprise to no one.

Charming people you choose to support.

[Eddie Strohacker]

BlackFlag said:

For everyone else, there's Wikileaks.

If I weren't Scherzeks breaking the rules by returning after a ban, I'd be hotly denying the claim. Funny that.

[Colonial]

Eddie Strohacker said:

If I weren't Scherzeks breaking the rules by returning after a ban, I'd be hotly denying the claim. Funny that.

Quite.

[rscott]

Colonial said:

BlackFlag said:

For everyone else, there's Wikileaks.

A rapist defending a self confessed perpetrator of sexual assault.

Now that's a surprise to no one.

Charming people you choose to support.

Indeed. That bastion of neutrality who has been shown to have DM'd Trumpy Jnr on many occasions.

[XM5ER]

jjlynn27 said:

This really sums up and explains the other half.

That meme is a great indicator of what lefties like yourself actually think of the working classes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upper_Clyde_Shipbuil...
This is what used to represent the lefts ideals, not the nasty, snipey crap that you posted.

[Byker28i]

Countdown said:

rscott said:

Do you even read the links you post? What does delivery of a sample of smuggled uranium in 2009 have to to with a deal in 2010 which Clinton didn't have control over?

By Jove I've got it!

Mueller was taking a free sample to Putin (on behalf of Clinton) so that he could check the quality of the Uranium before agreeing to buy the mine.

Obvious when you think about it.....

In fact the sample was so good he bought the mine, then bought the Country and the President!

[Byker28i]

BlackFlag said:

It wasn't debunked. Debunking means something was proven wrong.

Here try Fox news - Trumettes fav mouthpiece.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/11/14/obama-e...

The deal also “doesn’t allow for that uranium to be exported at all,” and about Clinton that she was not “personally involved” in the agreement.

Also that the people involved with approving the agreement knew that the FBI had an ongoing investigation into it.

And thats from Fox news!!!
No matter how many times trumpettes try to deflect with untruths, it's still true that Putin helped the donald win America’s presidential election, with his campaign team knowing about it and coordinating it.