London Underground Incident
Discussion
b
hstewie said:
hstewie said: What do you think they knew and why?
If you want to sling mud simply by association fair enough but if you stop for just a second and think about it do you really think that a 71 year old woman an an 88 year old man who have fostered over 250 kids and got an MBE in recognition of it saw some guns and thought "Nah fk it"?
foster parents of 71 and 88 is absurd.If you want to sling mud simply by association fair enough but if you stop for just a second and think about it do you really think that a 71 year old woman an an 88 year old man who have fostered over 250 kids and got an MBE in recognition of it saw some guns and thought "Nah f
k it"?How do you possibly expect people of that age group to have the required ability to properly supervise children with difficult backgrounds, just your average kid is knackering in those circumstances for a middle aged couple.
Yipper said:
Terror is, sadly, the new normal for the UK.
Just been through Luton Airport today and security is visibly at its highest ever level. Higher than after 911. Multiple layers, dogs, extra cameras, infrared scanners, the lot. Authorities are clearly very, very nervous and almost certainly expect more to come between now and Xmas. It's pretty sad.
Which is interesting as on Saturday I was in London all day including 2 major transport hubs and didst see any Police at all. Just been through Luton Airport today and security is visibly at its highest ever level. Higher than after 911. Multiple layers, dogs, extra cameras, infrared scanners, the lot. Authorities are clearly very, very nervous and almost certainly expect more to come between now and Xmas. It's pretty sad.
mickmcpaddy said:
I'd say its most, I do a job where I meet different people all the time and if I get talking to them about things like this they are generally a bit coy at first but when they find out my my views I've yet to meet anyone who doesn't want to kick the lot out.
Top Bombing.mcdjl said:
I was in London Docklands on Friday and saw lots of extra police. In central London later on....none.
I came into town via Kings X/St Panc so was expecting a heavy presence there for sure, maybe they were there but couldn't see them. Agree about Central, nothing anywhere, was a bit odd to say the leastI do think that the comment re cockroaches is to be blunt distasteful and unnecessary
This won't endear me to some of the fluffies on here who like to hurl the racist tag around. But I just say it how it is
And I think its rather unpleasant and not required. Moreover its the kind of thing that gets threads shut down unecessarily
mickmcpaddy said:
desolate said:
mickmcpaddy said:
I'd say its most, I do a job where I meet different people all the time and if I get talking to them about things like this they are generally a bit coy at first but when they find out my my views I've yet to meet anyone who doesn't want to kick the lot out.
Top Bombing.mickmcpaddy said:
Everyone that wants to keep their way of life and not adapt to the British way or integrate at all. Who cares if they were born here or not, I'm sure other countries would welcome the promising young footballer type with open arms.
Crack on with defining the British way then. Or do we all just fall in behind you?
KrissKross said:
_dobbo_ said:
KrissKross said:
1. Speak English, communication is quite important.
2. Don't dress like pacman ghosts. It scares us.
3. Don't kill us please in the name of a medieval cult.
How a woman dresses doesn't scare me. I didn't think proper British blokes were scared of how women dress. Or really clothes in general. 2. Don't dress like pacman ghosts. It scares us.
3. Don't kill us please in the name of a medieval cult.
Maybe you're actually not British enough to stay here? I mean seriously, scared of clothes? Two world wars to defend the right to post on the internet about being scared of clothes? I can hear a lot of grave rolling going on.
You were asked a straight question. You gave your answer. No, rightly, you're being called out for it because it was a stupid answer (just like your "we should use AI to replace national governments").
And now you're trying to pass it off as some flippant clever clever swipe at nothing you can think of.
Won't wash.
mickmcpaddy said:
I'm not really a fan of Piers Morgan but he is spot on in this article.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4896052/PI...
+1http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4896052/PI...
I don't see anything racist or anti muslim or anti Islamic in that article.
Its well thought out and simply states what many think
But that wont be good enough for certain types who see racism EVERYWHERE and cannot stop to fall over them selves in calling it out
Laurel Green said:
Not if Diane Abbot was doing the mathsDan_1981 said:
I thought that was a bit strange as well.Perhaps the initial charges are 'nailed on' and any terrorism related matters can follow after more in depth investigation.
TheLordJohn said:
Those must be the same security services who grouped, trained, armed and financed domestic fighting units to fight in Libya.
One of which then went on to blow himself up in Manchester ruining the lives of 1000's.
It would definitely be a very good idea to stop doing stuff like that.One of which then went on to blow himself up in Manchester ruining the lives of 1000's.
Laurel Green said:
Best hope he hasn't got an elderly relative who suddenly has a heart attackrscott said:
Laurel Green said:
4 in custody, 3 released without charge?rscott said:
Yep. And I don't have a particular problem with it either. If they have suspicions, then arrest, investigate, release if no evidence. Doesn't matter what religion (or not), whether left or right wing. Just do it with proper judicial oversight (as seems to be the case at present)
Perhaps more privacy unless charged though - not just in terrorism offences, but generally too.
As someone who was arrested on suspicion of murder, I would agree. There is something seriously wrong in a system where someone who is accused of a crime but not charged or convicted has their identity splashed about in the public domain. You see this destroying peoples lives, especially in cases such as suspected rape.Perhaps more privacy unless charged though - not just in terrorism offences, but generally too.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff