Sally Jones (white widow) killed by drone,

Sally Jones (white widow) killed by drone,

Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Thursday 12th October 2017
quotequote all
Zod said:
rofl Do you know what a parrot is? rofl
I suspect he does but the other guy whose deleted his post in the last 5 minutes plainly doesnt

Zod

35,295 posts

259 months

Thursday 12th October 2017
quotequote all
Some seriously parrot-blind people in this thread. Or are they just thick?

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Thursday 12th October 2017
quotequote all
techiedave said:
I see the angels of death are falling over themselves this morning to applaud this womans brutal death. I ask you this. Wouldn’t it have been fairer to arrest her and let her face trial rather than just kill her by a remote controlled act of murder?
Edited by techiedave on Thursday 12th October 10:04
Its not decent war porn unless they release the footage in high definition. The graphic team at the Sun can only do so much.

Sheets Tabuer

18,991 posts

216 months

Thursday 12th October 2017
quotequote all
techiedave said:
STe_rsv4 said:
techiedave said:
I see the angels of death are falling over themselves this morning to applaud this womans brutal death. I ask you this. Wouldn’t it have been fairer to arrest her and let her face trial rather than just kill her by a remote controlled act of murder?

I believe it would have been fairer and simply better that she be captured and put on trial for her alleged offences. To this end a team of Commandos* could have been sent to capture her, read her rights to her Then she could have been brought back to the UK to face trial.

A suitable human rights lawyer could have been appointed to defend her (of course she could have chosen her own solicitor as is her right) and eventually after a few years she would then have faced trial. Without pre judging such a trial it would show the world how fair we are.
Assuming a guilty sentence or plea and assuming a custodial sentence (both of which are just assumptions) then by keeping her behind bars we would show a clear sign to all followers of that brand of terrorism.
Ah yes. Lets risk the lives of our armed forces to infiltrate into a country where if captured, you likely face being tortured then beheaded on camera. Then once you have somehow exfiltrated with the hostage in said hostile territory, the UK taxpayer will no doubt spend millions on the high profile trial, all the while the hand wringing lefties will defend the accused while her family come out and announce that she was just misunderstood.

Nah mate, just keep sendig in drones, Ill sleep better at night knowing which way my taxes were spent.
Your taxes are not the issue here

I totally abhor your views and the way in which you welcome the spectre of death rather than the angel of justice and fairness I simultaneously support your right to express these views as I appreciate we live in a democracy.
Until such time as we can supress such views as yours I am obliged to put up with them though I suspect the tide is turning against them and in any case once new laws are put in place you will be stopped from espousing them on the internet.
However I must actually thank you as I have edited my post to include something I meant to post originally and that is the definition of commando
I was not celebrating her death because she has a 12 year old son that she has used in the most despicable way and I felt sorry for him.

I was sympathetic to what you were saying until you wrote the above, seriously read it back and ask yourself is what you said in proportion and what a normal person would say?

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Thursday 12th October 2017
quotequote all
dieselgrunt said:
she is one of the few people who deserved a death sentence rather than imprisonment in prison.
Maybe they could have imprisoned her somewhere other than a prison ?


DoubleSix

11,718 posts

177 months

Thursday 12th October 2017
quotequote all
techiedave said:
Your taxes are not the issue here

I totally abhor your views and the way in which you welcome the spectre of death rather than the angel of justice and fairness I simultaneously support your right to express these views as I appreciate we live in a democracy.
Until such time as we can supress such views as yours I am obliged to put up with them though I suspect the tide is turning against them and in any case once new laws are put in place you will be stopped from espousing them on the internet.
However I must actually thank you as I have edited my post to include something I meant to post originally and that is the definition of commando
Loving your work!


n.b. Why are people so thick/gullible?

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Thursday 12th October 2017
quotequote all
DoubleSix said:
techiedave said:
Your taxes are not the issue here

I totally abhor your views and the way in which you welcome the spectre of death rather than the angel of justice and fairness I simultaneously support your right to express these views as I appreciate we live in a democracy.
Until such time as we can supress such views as yours I am obliged to put up with them though I suspect the tide is turning against them and in any case once new laws are put in place you will be stopped from espousing them on the internet.
However I must actually thank you as I have edited my post to include something I meant to post originally and that is the definition of commando
Loving your work!


n.b. Why are people so thick/gullible?
Thing is though some of the crap I stick up is actually just a quick copy/ paste/ edit for ridiculousness from actual responses elsewhere.
I should start linking to some of the stuff I find. It's seriously scary when you read it. Facebooks a treasure trove for such stuff. Then you look at the peoples profiles and you think fook they really mean it.

turbomoped

4,180 posts

84 months

Thursday 12th October 2017
quotequote all
After the Falklands which was probably the greatest conventional war by any army in modern history we didn't have argies committing terrorist acts against British interests.
Skip forward to today and somebody skulking in a bunker launching weapons is what fuels the random acts or terror on our streets.
Apparently some idiot want to dish out medals to drone operators.Bet they wont wear them in public.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Thursday 12th October 2017
quotequote all
DoubleSix said:
techiedave said:
Your taxes are not the issue here

I totally abhor your views and the way in which you welcome the spectre of death rather than the angel of justice and fairness I simultaneously support your right to express these views as I appreciate we live in a democracy.
Until such time as we can supress such views as yours I am obliged to put up with them though I suspect the tide is turning against them and in any case once new laws are put in place you will be stopped from espousing them on the internet.
However I must actually thank you as I have edited my post to include something I meant to post originally and that is the definition of commando
Loving your work!


n.b. Why are people so thick/gullible?
Bit weird really, plenty of people disapprove of drone strikes. It’s not an view you won’t hear from people.

It’s certainly not a stranger view than you’d hear from people on here. I’m not surprised people thought it wasn’t sarcasm at all. I thought it was genuine and just though fair enough, each to their own,

You only get it because you’re internet mates or something,

Username888

505 posts

202 months

Thursday 12th October 2017
quotequote all

Her 12 year old was probably with her.

Potentially hundreds of lives have been saved now these two have been vaporised.

Great to wake up to some positive, celebratory news for a change. I hope the footage of their death gets circulated.

Jawknee is innocent

2,579 posts

162 months

Thursday 12th October 2017
quotequote all
El stovey said:
It’s certainly not a stranger view than you’d hear from people on here. I’m not surprised people thought it wasn’t sarcasm at all. I thought it was genuine and just though fair enough, each to their own,
I can see this view as well. Unless people know you Dave they could easily have thought you are being serious. There are some strange and frightening people on NP&E who probably think smiting bad 'uns is wrong.

STe_rsv4

665 posts

99 months

Thursday 12th October 2017
quotequote all
What the fk is all this "whhoshing" and "parrots" st all about on here lately?
sorry, its a a rhetorical question. I know that it means that "I have somehow been suckered in" to a sarcastic stament made by a poster on here.

My point is, how the fk is someone meant to know a sarcastic post from a genuine post in writing? And more so, why do it in the first place, unless it helps make you somehow feel more witty and gives you the chance to put up a generic parrot meme to generate laughs?

Zod

35,295 posts

259 months

Thursday 12th October 2017
quotequote all
STe_rsv4 said:
What the fk is all this "whhoshing" and "parrots" st all about on here lately?
sorry, its a a rhetorical question. I know that it means that "I have somehow been suckered in" to a sarcastic stament made by a poster on here.

My point is, how the fk is someone meant to know a sarcastic post from a genuine post in writing? And more so, why do it in the first place, unless it helps make you somehow feel more witty and gives you the chance to put up a generic parrot meme to generate laughs?
Most don’t find it difficult.....

DoubleSix

11,718 posts

177 months

Thursday 12th October 2017
quotequote all
El stovey said:
You only get it because you’re internet mates or something,
Nope. I get it because it was laced with obvious sarcasm. A blatant charicature...


anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Thursday 12th October 2017
quotequote all
STe_rsv4 said:
What the fk is all this "whhoshing" and "parrots" st all about on here lately?
sorry, its a a rhetorical question. I know that it means that "I have somehow been suckered in" to a sarcastic stament made by a poster on here.

My point is, how the fk is someone meant to know a sarcastic post from a genuine post in writing? And more so, why do it in the first place, unless it helps make you somehow feel more witty and gives you the chance to put up a generic parrot meme to generate laughs?
Exactly. It’s just an in joke at others expense but it’s a huge forum and most posters don’t know the whoosher so it’s a pointless clique thing.

Poster A posts sarcasm
Poster B says it’s weird
Posters C and D say oh look! whoosh! We know poster A isn’t like that normally.
Poster B and everyone else says who’s poster A

Edited by anonymous-user on Thursday 12th October 11:36

DoubleSix

11,718 posts

177 months

Thursday 12th October 2017
quotequote all
El stovey said:
Exactly. It’s just an in joke at others expense but it’s a huge forum and most posters don’t know the whoosher so it’s a pointless clique thing.

Poster A posts sarcasm
Poster B says it’s weird
Posters C and D say oh look! whoosh! We know poster A isn’t like that normally.
Poster B and everyone else says WTF who’s poster A
You’re wrong.

It’s just satire.

Close enough to the truth to be worrying, far away enough to be hilarious.

Edited by DoubleSix on Thursday 12th October 11:42

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Thursday 12th October 2017
quotequote all
DoubleSix said:
El stovey said:
Exactly. It’s just an in joke at others expense but it’s a huge forum and most posters don’t know the whoosher so it’s a pointless clique thing.

Poster A posts sarcasm
Poster B says it’s weird
Posters C and D say oh look! whoosh! We know poster A isn’t like that normally.
Poster B and everyone else says WTF who’s poster A
You’re wrong.

It’s just satire.

Close enough to the truth to be worrying, far away enough to be hilarious.

Edited by DoubleSix on Thursday 12th October 11:42
Which you only get as you know the poster. Look we get it, you’re mates and know what each other normally posts. Not everyone else does though. It’s a big old forum.

People come here and post all kind of views. If you don’t know them, you don’t know if they’re taking the piss or not.

UnclePat

508 posts

88 months

Thursday 12th October 2017
quotequote all
Not sure how anyone could be ars*d trawling through nonsense elsewhere, just to cut & paste it on here as some giggle-some, in-jokery pretence.

DoubleSix

11,718 posts

177 months

Thursday 12th October 2017
quotequote all
El stovey said:
Which you only get as you know the poster. Look we get it, you’re mates and know what each other normally posts. Not everyone else does though. It’s a big old forum.

People come here and post all kind of views. If you don’t know them, you don’t know if they’re taking the piss or not.
Why do you keep saying that??

I don’t know him from Adam.

Re-read his post, it’s bloody obvious to anyone but a child or the dull of mind I’m afraid.

kowalski655

14,656 posts

144 months

Thursday 12th October 2017
quotequote all
jonnM said:
Shame, she was a total MILF smile
Mum I'd like to flambé?