Sally Jones (white widow) killed by drone,
Discussion
DoubleSix said:
El stovey said:
Which you only get as you know the poster. Look we get it, you’re mates and know what each other normally posts. Not everyone else does though. It’s a big old forum.
People come here and post all kind of views. If you don’t know them, you don’t know if they’re taking the piss or not.
Why do you keep saying that??People come here and post all kind of views. If you don’t know them, you don’t know if they’re taking the piss or not.
I don’t know him from Adam.
Re-read his post, it’s bloody obvious to anyone but a child or the dull of mind I’m afraid.
El stovey said:
DoubleSix said:
El stovey said:
Which you only get as you know the poster. Look we get it, you’re mates and know what each other normally posts. Not everyone else does though. It’s a big old forum.
People come here and post all kind of views. If you don’t know them, you don’t know if they’re taking the piss or not.
Why do you keep saying that??People come here and post all kind of views. If you don’t know them, you don’t know if they’re taking the piss or not.
I don’t know him from Adam.
Re-read his post, it’s bloody obvious to anyone but a child or the dull of mind I’m afraid.
We’ll stick to ‘knock knock’ jokes from here on in so you don’t feel left out.
So what started was a thread about a drone strike and has now been derailed into 2 pages of parrots / satire / in-jokes / backslapping.
Is there ever a thread on here where people can offer an alternative view and stay on track without somehow getting the parrot?
Anyway.. with that done, can we move on?
Is there ever a thread on here where people can offer an alternative view and stay on track without somehow getting the parrot?
Anyway.. with that done, can we move on?
gooner1 said:
Amateurish said:
No, serious point. Is that allowed?
Also shame about her son. Collateral damage?
It certainly is allowed and I agree re the shame about her son. Also shame about her son. Collateral damage?
Oh no irony or sarcasm just a question btw
It's just if it is isn't that the same footage where he then shoots the prisoner in the head ?
I don't think I'll think its a shame myself.
techiedave said:
This wouldn't be the son whom the grandparents recognised in the footage posted of him would it ?
Oh no irony or sarcasm just a question btw
It's just if it is isn't that the same footage where he then shoots the prisoner in the head ?
I don't think I'll think its a shame myself.
It is surprising that when the US carries out a targeted assassination causing the death of a British child, so many are quick to applaud. Oh no irony or sarcasm just a question btw
It's just if it is isn't that the same footage where he then shoots the prisoner in the head ?
I don't think I'll think its a shame myself.
Child soldier or not (I honestly don't know, neither I suspect do you) this is tragic.
techiedave said:
This wouldn't be the son whom the grandparents recognised in the footage posted of him would it ?
Oh no irony or sarcasm just a question btw
It's just if it is isn't that the same footage where he then shoots the prisoner in the head ?
I don't think I'll think its a shame myself.
Did the son have a choice re joining Isis, how do you think most children ,who in all probabilty were subjected to horrendous sights and conditions, would have been mentally affected?Oh no irony or sarcasm just a question btw
It's just if it is isn't that the same footage where he then shoots the prisoner in the head ?
I don't think I'll think its a shame myself.
Our own fully trained soldiers are returning with PTSD, what chance would a kid stand?
gooner1 said:
Amateurish said:
No, serious point. Is that allowed?
Also shame about her son. Collateral damage?
It certainly is allowed and I agree re the shame about her son. Also shame about her son. Collateral damage?
Smollet said:
gooner1 said:
Amateurish said:
No, serious point. Is that allowed?
Also shame about her son. Collateral damage?
It certainly is allowed and I agree re the shame about her son. Also shame about her son. Collateral damage?
I expect it would have been difficult to integrate after growing up doing this kind of thing. Terrible brain washing by mum and she had already used him as a human shield many times according to the US.
Could therapy etc deradicalise young people of 12?
I understand there has been some success using cognitive behavioural therapy with African child soldiers and some middle eastern jihadis in the UAE and Saudi.
Unfortunately when your mum is high on the wanted list and uses you as a shield the odds of successful deradicalism aren’t good.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff