Harvey Weinstein
Discussion
kev1974 said:
Rushed to hospital instead of prison, due to suffering chest pains on the way
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8038717/H...
Check out the video of the somewhat distinctive foreman of the jury being harassed by the media after leaving the courthouse, that's embedded half way down that report!
I guess clutching your chest and saying your arm is tingling buys you a few hours more before you have to hear that cell door slam shut in Rikers Island.https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8038717/H...
Check out the video of the somewhat distinctive foreman of the jury being harassed by the media after leaving the courthouse, that's embedded half way down that report!
“Rikers Island has a reputation for violence, abuse and neglect of inmates”
Lord Marylebone said:
kev1974 said:
Rushed to hospital instead of prison, due to suffering chest pains on the way
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8038717/H...
Check out the video of the somewhat distinctive foreman of the jury being harassed by the media after leaving the courthouse, that's embedded half way down that report!
I guess clutching your chest and saying your arm is tingling buys you a few hours more before you have to hear that cell door slam shut in Rikers Island.https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8038717/H...
Check out the video of the somewhat distinctive foreman of the jury being harassed by the media after leaving the courthouse, that's embedded half way down that report!
“Rikers Island has a reputation for violence, abuse and neglect of inmates”
Stay in Bed Instead said:
Seems like a lot.
I think the maximum was nearly 30 years but his lawyers were seeking discount based on health, age and contribution to the film industry. Their ploy seemed to have worked to an extent, however their client will not likely see the light of day again. take-good-care-of-the-forest-dewey said:
Really? Persistent sex offender who has shown no remorse, and would likely have carried on if not caught.
He was found not guilty of more charges than he was found guilty of.There was no physical evidence and it was just who the jury believed more.
So yes, it seems high to me.
Stay in Bed Instead said:
take-good-care-of-the-forest-dewey said:
Really? Persistent sex offender who has shown no remorse, and would likely have carried on if not caught.
He was found not guilty of more charges than he was found guilty of.There was no physical evidence and it was just who the jury believed more.
So yes, it seems high to me.
Stay in Bed Instead said:
He was found not guilty of more charges than he was found guilty of.
There was no physical evidence and it was just who the jury believed more.
So yes, it seems high to me.
If only you'd sent in your evidence then... You know... The stuff that leads you to believe the abuse was actually pretty minor stuff. There was no physical evidence and it was just who the jury believed more.
So yes, it seems high to me.
You could have prevented a travesty of justice.
take-good-care-of-the-forest-dewey said:
If only you'd sent in your evidence then... You know... The stuff that leads you to believe the abuse was actually pretty minor stuff.
You could have prevented a travesty of justice.
Did you imagine what I wrote or something?You could have prevented a travesty of justice.
It's my opinion. It doesn't have to agree with yours. Sorry about that.
take-good-care-of-the-forest-dewey said:
Really? Persistent sex offender who has shown no remorse, and would likely have carried on if not caught.
yes, for sure.Ian Watkins only got a few more years for literally raping babies and pissing on underage girls.
with his legal team I was expecting ~10 years
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff